Channel
@tolipovorif
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
54,059subscribers
-838 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001389028880 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tolipovorif |
| Description | · Jurnalist, sharhlovchi • https://www.tirikchilik.uz/oriftolipov 298798 🔖Reklama bo‘yicha takliflar: @kalitbon |
| Created | 25 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tolipovorif |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 54,059 | -663 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 54,722 | -108 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:38 | 54,830 | -111 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 54,941 | -109 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:56 | 55,050 | +64 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 54,986 | -44 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 55,030 | +16 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 55,014 | -86 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:29 | 55,100 | -54 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:25 | 55,154 | -56 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 55,210 | +279 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 54,931 | +347 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 54,584 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 54,583 | -39 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:59 | 54,622 | +197 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 54,425 | -58 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 54,483 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 54,494 | +16 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:39 | 54,478 | +31 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 54,447 | first reading |
333 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 333 (1 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 3,012,410 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 61 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Тез орада Англиядан подскастлар режа қиляпмиз. Катта ўйинлар, АПЛ ва ЕЧЛ муҳитини яна ичкаридан ҳис қиламиз! Манчестер, Ливерпул ва Лондонда ёзиладиган суҳбатларимиз учун ҳозирда тижорий ҳамкорларга бир неча жой очиқ. Алоқага чиқинг, батафсил маълумот берилади. Telegram: @msektor_uz Tel nomer: +99888 030 0808
Signed OTB
Kuniga 2 banka shirin ichimlik: qon bosimi xavfi 52% yuqori 2026 yilda Circulation jurnalida 25 749 kishini bolalikdan 25 yilgacha kuzatgan tadqiqot chiqdi. Ular 9–16 yoshida roʻyxatga olingan va oʻrtacha 36 yoshgacha kuzatilgan. Kuniga 2 va undan koʻp banka shirin ichimlik ichganlarda qon bosimi oshishi haftasiga 3 bankadan kam ichganlarga nisbatan 52% koʻproq uchradi. Kuniga 1,5 stakan va koʻproq meva sharbatida …
Signed OTB
Зумерлардан ҳали кўп калтак ейди)
Signed OTB
«Manchester Siti»ning moliyaviy firibgarliklari haqidagi hujjatlarni sizdirgan xaker Rui Pintu kim ekanligini bilasizmi? 2015-yilda portugaliyalik erkin xaker (mustaqil youtubedagi roliklar orqali xakingni o'rgangan) Rui Pintu «Jon» taxallusi ostida Football Leaks saytiga asos solgan. Bu saytda klublar, futbolchilar va agentlarning maxfiy shartnomalari, yozishmalari hamda moliyaviy hujjatlari e’lon qilinardi. Vaqt …
Signed OTB
@tolipovorif
Signed OTB
Мен бунда исмларга урғу бермоқчи эдим, рамзий экан)
Signed OTB
Сарлавҳаларнинг ўзи алоҳида мавзу: Криштиану Жезус билан келиша олмаяпти
Signed OTB
Якунда қандайдир муроса йўли топилса керак, Криштиану Роналду шахси шу қадар улканки, у билан бу тариқа якун бўлиши мумкин эмас.
Signed OTB
Роналду атрофидаги воқеалар жуда ғалати тус олмоқда.
Signed OTB
Шу тўғри ёндашув.
Signed OTB
СаманДАРвозабон! Баракалла!
Signed OTB
Video message, posted without a caption
Signed OTB
Showing the 12 most recent of 333 posts we hold for @tolipovorif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@tolipovorif edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Oltin top kimniki bo'ladi?
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Автомобил ҳайдовчилари учун сўровнома: Бир ойда неча маротаба йўл ҳаракати қоидасини бузасиз?
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Soʻrovnoma #2. “Arsenal” muxlislari va klubni kuzatib boruvchilar uchun: Vinisius klubga kerakmi?
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 333 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Orif Tolipov” (@tolipovorif), 54,059 subscribers as measured 30 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tolipovorif.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.