Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tijay

Channel

Tijay

@tijayamin

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

66,602subscribers

+1,258 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001207098014
TypeChannel
Username@tijayamin
Created14 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tijayamin

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

49,500 average views per post against 66,496 subscribers — an engagement rate of 74.4%. Across the 3,241 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,631–99,988 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.30% and 12.3%, with a median of 5.86%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (17 July 2026 16 August 2026)
Posts measured35 of 36 published in the window (0 exact, 35 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,732,200
Mature posts only79.6% over 32 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers66,496 measured 14 August 2026
Cohortb31623:fas · 3,241 channels · p10 0.951% · p25 2.30% · p50 5.86% · p75 12.3% · p90 22.4%
Position in cohort99.321th percentile · 12.7× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.025% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 16 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

65,34466,60265,9735 August 2026 — 65,344 subscribers6 August 2026 — 65,344 subscribers6 August 2026 — 65,389 subscribers7 August 2026 — 65,512 subscribers8 August 2026 — 65,580 subscribers9 August 2026 — 65,680 subscribers10 August 2026 — 66,026 subscribers11 August 2026 — 66,197 subscribers12 August 2026 — 66,334 subscribers13 August 2026 — 66,410 subscribers14 August 2026 — 66,496 subscribers16 August 2026 — 66,602 subscribers5 August 202616 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 10 days, net +1,258. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65,155–66,791 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:3566,602+106
14 Aug 2026, 16:4966,496+86
13 Aug 2026, 08:3366,410+76
12 Aug 2026, 05:0366,334+137
11 Aug 2026, 04:1166,197+171
10 Aug 2026, 04:4466,026+346
9 Aug 2026, 01:2165,680+100
8 Aug 2026, 03:0865,580+68
7 Aug 2026, 03:0365,512+123
6 Aug 2026, 04:1065,389+45
6 Aug 2026, 01:3665,344no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:0165,344first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.3%
avg views ÷ 66,602 subscribers
Avg views / post
49,500
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 32 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held38 (16 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total1,732,200
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 01:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,110
across the posts below
Posts paid on
34
of 37 we hold a reading for · 92%
Most on one post
645
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tijayamin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC≈11,400 views0 reactions12 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

15 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈15,200 views0 reactions30 Starsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @wavyneemPhoto

⏳⏳⏳

13 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC≈21,200 views0 reactions14 Starsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @TrapeFarsiPhoto

📈 New Statistics 🎵 موزیک "لب تیغ" از "امین تیجی" وارد چارت گلوبال هیپ هاپ پلتفرم "ساندکلاد" شد و در رتبه ۴۴ قرار گرفت. - این موزیک در چارت کشور های آلمان 🇩🇪 ، انگلیس 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 و فرانسه 🇫🇷 هم حضور دارد. 📍@TrapeFarsi | #Vinnky

13 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈26,100 views0 reactions27 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

10 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC≈38,700 views0 reactions11 Starsread 16 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

10 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC≈33,700 views0 reactions6 Starsread 16 August 2026
Photo

سینگل ترک های منتشر شده از آلبوم پله اضطراری تیجی تا الان LabeTigh Tijay:) Tehran Delgir Zombie Promethazine ترک لب تیغ آخرین ترک منتشر شده از تیجی زیر ۲۴ ساعت وارد چارت جهانی ساندکلاد شده و رتبه ۸ رو بدست آورد. #rza @Hip_Hopi

9 Aug 2026, 21:19 UTC≈35,300 views0 reactions9 Starsread 16 August 2026

کار همه جا بالاس میخوامتون شب بخیر

9 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC≈41,300 views0 reactions113 Starsread 16 August 2026

https://youtu.be/CiOqgQBNgrw?is=eOwLvjkHZr7pY6II

9 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC≈31,600 views0 reactions7 Starsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @TrapeFarsiPhoto

✈️News 📰موزیک "لب تیغ" از "امین تیجی" سمپل شده از موزیک "The Tale of Momo" از "Jeremy Zuckerman" می باشد. 📰 این موزیک در قسمت ۱۵ از فصل دوم انیمیشن "Avatar: The Last Airbender" پخش شد؛ اپیزودی که بر محوریت چند کانسپت مختلف می‌گردد: 📰 غم، دلتنگی و گم‌شدن در غربت بدون دوست، از مفاهیم اصلی این قسمت از انیمیشن بودند؛ لحظه‌ای که "مومو" (لمور پرنده و وفادار) به دنبال "آپا" دزدیده‌شده در خیابان‌های باسینگ‌سی می‌گردد. اما

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @tijayamin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 50,459 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tiem
@tiemeshon · 129,030
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
Ashkan Kagan
@ashkan_kagan · 117,866
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
Reza Pishro
@pishroofficial · 104,837
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
PooriaPutaK
@putakk · 221,430
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Jermil | جرمیل
@jermmil · 127,890
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
ittahas
@ittahass · 111,016
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
acɔord
@acccrd · 192,251
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
koorowsh
@koorowshOfficial · 102,297
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Tiem Crypto | سیگنال رایگان
@tiemcrypto · 373,572
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
HipHopTweety | هیپ هاپ توییتی
@HipHopTweety · 202,039
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
HipHop FUN Quiz
@hiphopfunquiz · 172,125
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
THTEEN
@thteen0 · 134,799
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 August 2026
Hip X Hopi
@hip_hopi · 258,100
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
MOWJ4
@Mowj4 · 340,498
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Rap King
@rapking · 307,911
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
X PlayList 🕊️ پلی لیست
@XPlay_List · 121,526
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
اخبار جنگ | RapFars Collection
@RapFars_Collection · 105,230
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 August 2026
Rap God News
@RapGodNews · 179,652
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
RapAlert
@RapAlert · 296,590
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
[ Fun HipHop ]
@funhiphop · 223,623
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
رپ بد نیوز | RapBad Newz
@RapBad_Newz · 280,265
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
RapTV
@raptv · 377,927
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

3 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

on.soundcloud.comregistrable domain: soundcloud.com2 posts · 4 August 2026 – 4 August 2026 · example postNot linked — blocklisted domain
open.spotify.comregistrable domain: spotify.com2 posts · 4 August 2026 – 4 August 2026 · example post
vm.tiktok.comregistrable domain: tiktok.com1 post · 23 July 2026 – 23 July 2026 · example post

1 of 3 shown as text only, not a link. The exact host, not merely a domain it shares a registrable root with, matches a threat-intelligence blocklist this register already checks elsewhere (see methodology) — the link still appearing in a post is still a measured fact and is still shown, but no anchor is rendered here, so no click and no link equity passes to it from this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tijay” (@tijayamin), 66,602 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tijayamin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.