Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
53,900 average views per post against 73,930 subscribers — an engagement rate of 72.9%. Across the 3,323 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,633–99,918 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.26% and 12.0%, with a median of 5.68%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (21 July 2026 – 20 August 2026)
Posts measured
29 of 29 published in the window (0 exact, 29 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,562,740
Mature posts only
72.9% over 29 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 20 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 15 days, net +32,068. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44,992–86,680 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
20 Aug 2026, 23:43
81,870
+7,940
19 Aug 2026, 23:51
73,930
+9,080
19 Aug 2026, 01:27
64,850
+3,125
17 Aug 2026, 23:03
61,725
+1,343
16 Aug 2026, 21:32
60,382
+2,741
15 Aug 2026, 13:09
57,641
+5,184
14 Aug 2026, 03:29
52,457
+301
12 Aug 2026, 21:56
52,156
+532
11 Aug 2026, 19:57
51,624
+751
10 Aug 2026, 21:01
50,873
+264
9 Aug 2026, 23:34
50,609
+246
8 Aug 2026, 23:57
50,363
+191
8 Aug 2026, 00:47
50,172
+137
6 Aug 2026, 22:05
50,035
+233
6 Aug 2026, 01:46
49,802
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:33
49,802
first reading
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
65.1%
avg views ÷ 81,870 subscribers
Avg views / post
53,300
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held
38 (11 July 2026 – 19 August 2026)
Views total
1,386,600
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
25
Videos
6
Links
88
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6,114
across the posts below
Posts paid on
29
of 37 we hold a reading for · 78%
Most on one post
641
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hesamtiemchannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
خوشحالم که خدا منو لایق این دونست که بهترین البوم رپ فارسیو بدم امیدوارم جنبشم بهم بده.
و بیشتر ازین خوشحالم که شما خوشتون امده از البوم .
دست بوس تکتکتونم
داداشتون حسام🫡
۸ماه منتظره امروز بودم چند ساعت بیشتر نمونده.
خدا به داد دشمنامون برس امروز
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @hesamtiemchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 4,004 of 1,569,762entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tiem @tiemeshon · 152,854 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
Tiem Crypto | سیگنال رایگان @tiemcrypto · 369,605 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
Sajad Shahi @sajshah · 79,442 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
Tijay @tijayamin · 67,573 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Vinak @VinakOfficial1 · 87,881 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
Mahdyar.kp @Mahdyarofficial · 85,094 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
Ashkan Kagan @ashkan_kagan · 118,169 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
HipHopFree | هیپ هاپ فری 🖤 @hiiphopfree · 81,272 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
acɔord @acccrd · 189,324 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
RapCity @rapcity · 79,642 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
ittahas @ittahass · 110,445 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 August 2026
koorowsh @koorowshOfficial · 102,802 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
MOWJ4 @Mowj4 · 336,872 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
PooriaPutaK @putakk · 220,551 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
𝗥𝗮𝗽𝗶𝗪𝗮𝗿 @RapiWar · 73,717 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
- RapRelease @RapRelease · 75,777 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HesamTiem” (@hesamtiemchannel), 81,870 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hesamtiemchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
