Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
104,000 average views per post against 78,075 subscribers — an engagement rate of 133.5%. Across the 3,067 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,627–99,869 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.41% and 12.2%, with a median of 5.96%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
16 of 17 published in the window (0 exact, 16 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,667,900
Mature posts only
133.5% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2,214. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,529–78,407 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 22:17
78,075
+157
12 Aug 2026, 00:53
77,918
+562
11 Aug 2026, 00:21
77,356
+594
9 Aug 2026, 22:22
76,762
+516
8 Aug 2026, 20:54
76,246
+95
7 Aug 2026, 20:15
76,151
+121
6 Aug 2026, 20:44
76,030
+169
6 Aug 2026, 01:45
75,861
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:37
75,861
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
133.5%
avg views ÷ 78,075 subscribers
Avg views / post
104,000
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
25 (26 June 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
1,667,900
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 19:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,947
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 24 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
1,280
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sajshah. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
بچهها، یه عذرخواهی بهتون بدهکاریم🙏🏻
پکهای فیزیکی آلبوم، به خاطر یه سری تأخیر خارج از برنامه، دیرتر از چیزی که قول داده بودیم به دستتون میرسه.
ممنونیم از صبر، حمایت و عشقی که همیشه بهمون دادین. به محض آمادگی کامل به بهترین نحو ، بدون هیچ معطلی براتون ارسال بشه.
شرمنده بابت تأخیر
تا آخر ماه اینده به دستتون میرسته
مرسی از مرامتون . ❤️
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @sajshah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 8,069 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PooriaPutaK @putakk · 222,112 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
HipHop FUN Quiz @hiphopfunquiz · 172,634 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
HipHopTweety | هیپ هاپ توییتی @HipHopTweety · 202,579 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
MOWJ4 @Mowj4 · 343,344 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
Hip X Hopi @hip_hopi · 255,381 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
acɔord @acccrd · 194,193 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
علیض @Aliztory · 166,600 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
﮼کدئین @Codeain · 334,150 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
ᴇᴄꜱᴛᴀꜱʏ @initiatur · 188,651 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
رپ بد نیوز | RapBad Newz @RapBad_Newz · 254,881 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
سهیل سلبا @solbasoheil · 147,087 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Rap King @rapking · 308,137 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
Rap God News @RapGodNews · 180,904 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
RapTV @raptv · 371,832 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sajad Shahi” (@sajshah), 78,075 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sajshah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
