Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ciainthehood

Channel

Ciainthehood

@ciainthehood

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,169subscribers

+1,638 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001349421289
TypeChannel
Username@ciainthehood
Created27 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ciainthehood

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

15,900 average views per post against 24,169 subscribers — an engagement rate of 65.8%. Across the 5,319 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,006–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.78% and 13.3%, with a median of 6.43%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured23 of 23 published in the window (0 exact, 23 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled365,880
Mature posts only65.8% over 23 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers24,169 measured 25 September 2026
Cohortb10000:fas · 5,319 channels · p10 1.17% · p25 2.78% · p50 6.43% · p75 13.3% · p90 21.8%
Position in cohort99.568th percentile · 10.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.034% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languagePersian · 75.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

22,53124,26223,396.55 August 2026 — 22,531 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,531 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,743 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,872 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,972 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,046 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,154 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,210 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,267 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,284 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,306 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,329 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,355 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,490 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,543 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,581 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,608 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,651 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,660 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,682 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,697 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,703 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,694 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,710 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,741 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,765 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,800 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,815 subscribers5 September 2026 — 23,826 subscribers8 September 2026 — 24,176 subscribers11 September 2026 — 24,223 subscribers13 September 2026 — 24,262 subscribers14 September 2026 — 24,255 subscribers16 September 2026 — 24,251 subscribers19 September 2026 — 24,239 subscribers25 September 2026 — 24,169 subscribers24,1695 August 202625 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net +1,638. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,271–24,522 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 21:3824,169-70
19 Sept 2026, 08:2024,239-12
16 Sept 2026, 20:2024,251-4
14 Sept 2026, 21:5924,255-7
13 Sept 2026, 05:5824,262+39
11 Sept 2026, 06:1824,223+47
8 Sept 2026, 12:1824,176+350
5 Sept 2026, 06:5723,826+11
3 Sept 2026, 11:3823,815+15
2 Sept 2026, 09:1223,800+35
1 Sept 2026, 08:0723,765+24
31 Aug 2026, 08:4223,741+31
30 Aug 2026, 05:3623,710+16
29 Aug 2026, 04:1223,694-9
28 Aug 2026, 05:4323,703+6
27 Aug 2026, 04:4723,697+15
26 Aug 2026, 04:5223,682+22
25 Aug 2026, 05:1823,660+9
24 Aug 2026, 00:1623,651+43
22 Aug 2026, 07:0723,608first reading

Engagement

76 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.8%
avg views ÷ 24,169 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,900
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.854%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 76 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held76 (16 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total365,880
Reactions total3,123
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 01:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13
Videos
2
Links
100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

16,015 reactions across 70 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤8,37952.3%
🔥5,09831.8%
👍1,3078.16%
💯9505.93%
👎2811.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,910 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
184
across the posts below
Posts paid on
26
of 73 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
39
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ciainthehood. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 76 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC≈11,700 views594 reactions3 Starsread 27 September 2026

گرمای مادرقحبه برو دیگه

👍532❤29👎16🔥13💯4

20 Sept 2026, 07:33 UTC≈9,760 views87 reactionsread 27 September 2026

https://open.spotify.com/album/5iPfKRan1W0YLLu0knvz2q?si=1b14BJCfRSegYLHK1oaHVw&utm_source=copy-link

🔥76❤6💯4👍1

18 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC≈11,100 views157 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026

https://youtu.be/SR-xS1vKG0o?is=qkzmbTQilllwomwP

🔥139❤11💯4👎3

9 Sept 2026, 23:04 UTC≈14,200 views71 reactionsread 27 September 2026

https://open.spotify.com/artist/0oVvxK4WAirlhIFuF8wGtv?si=ye9Z1m9LQMa8LeXnLsxz4Q&utm_source=copy-link

❤60🔥9💯2

8 Sept 2026, 21:59 UTC≈15,000 views221 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @colllomb

دورم از همتون شلوغ تره از همتونم تنها ترم

🔥185❤16👍13💯7

7 Sept 2026, 21:01 UTC≈15,900 views59 reactionsread 27 September 2026

https://youtu.be/Igdt4-bvxVM?si=8sppwJkDjTmFNNYN

❤51🔥5👎2💯1

7 Sept 2026, 21:00 UTC≈21,400 views150 reactionsread 27 September 2026

حکم دله تا صبح بهش میبازمو

❤132💯10🔥6👎2

7 Sept 2026, 20:28 UTC≈13,600 views50 reactionsread 27 September 2026

https://youtu.be/ycpJhNY-qEE?is=pAX400UQBRLyagWX

❤39💯5🔥4👍1👎1

5 Sept 2026, 22:08 UTC≈13,400 views77 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @koorowshOfficial

https://youtu.be/zPGHIS72Ino?si=2OMGgEmNVd_uiI4-

🔥71❤5💯1

4 Sept 2026, 23:30 UTC≈50,100 views444 reactions6 Starsread 27 September 2026

من یچیزایی کشیدم حتی نکشید ونگوک

🔥394❤20💯12👍11👎7

4 Sept 2026, 17:26 UTC≈16,600 views97 reactions5 Starsread 27 September 2026

Tiktok begaaeid berim vase story bazi ☄️☄️

❤88🔥7💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @ciainthehood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Ashkan Kagan
@ashkan_kagan · 118,231
#1
HesamTiem
@hesamtiemchannel · 83,097
#2
Tijay
@tijayamin · 70,543
#3
Sajad Shahi
@sajshah · 94,823
#4
Ali Geramy
@aligeramy · 47,778
#5
Tiem
@tiemeshon · 154,630
#6
RapCity
@rapcity · 81,867
#7
MOWJ4
@Mowj4 · 320,404
#8
Vinak
@VinakOfficial1 · 87,084
#9
Rap King
@rapking · 308,288
#10
Danial
@danialmajid79 · 334
#11
- RapRelease
@RapRelease · 77,509
#12
Trap Farsi
@TrapeFarsi · 47,019
#13
Mvshreghi
@mvshiontop · 10,262
#14
Rasam Sohrabi
@rasamsohraabi · 18,160
#15
Aliz
@AlmightyAliz · 3,062
#16
MoreShahin
@MoreShahin · 3,081
#17
Eycin
@eycin23 · 45,337
#18
PAABLOW
@pavbloww · 7,680
#19
NextUpGen
@NextUpGen · 3,274
#20
Sicatch
@sicatch · 975
#21
[ Fun HipHop ]
@funhiphop · 253,076
#22
Ali Geramy
@Aliegeramy1 · 27,473
#23
Dalu
@dalumc · 15,461
#24
Arman Miladi
@ArmanMiladiMusic · 1,761
#25
HipHop FUN Quiz
@hiphopfunquiz · 147,057
#26
koorowsh
@koorowshOfficial · 109,407
#27
NASLE PANJ 5
@NaslePanj5 · 4,268
#28
Amir Ribar️️
@RealRibar · 4,290
#29
Lil Deafo
@lildeafo · 3,843
#30
Parhum
@parhumsongs · 3,987
#31
ROOHI
@shayanroohi2 · 402
#32
رپ بد نیوز | RapBad Newz
@RapBad_Newz · 270,156
#33
Young Sudden
@youngsudden8 · 9,917
#34
Mitrxv | میترو
@mitrxvmusic · 2,795
#35
Erfan Paydar
@erfanpaydartelegram · 12,085
#36
M4han
@M4hanFlame · 1,350
#37
XWHISKY
@xwhisky · 14,301
#38
RapBega
@RapBega · 5,290
#39
Dousti | دوستی
@AkaDousti · 2,220
#40
Rap Plus News
@RapPlusNews · 88,900
#41
CatchyBeatz
@catchySR · 34,080
#42
Thrvshyyy
@thrvshyyy · 2,135
#43
PooriaPutaK
@putakk · 227,078
#44
T R A P C A F E 💎
@TrapCafe · 40,485
#45
Simi
@parsasimitelegram · 1,483
#46
MVDBRZ
@LORDOFJPG · 1,326
#47
IcyMoon
@iiicymoon · 859
#48
Frazi Boi
@FraziBoi · 1,307
#49
Arta
@residambetashh · 53,765
#50
Imanemun
@ImanemunMusic · 1,919
#51
StvrRise
@stvrrise · 1,462
#52
𝗔𝗛𝗔 𝗥𝗔𝗣 | اها رپ
@AhaRapOfficial · 14,917
#53
Pouriya Adroit
@olaghiadroit · 61,924
#54
Trap edu.
@TrapEdu · 1,195
#55
𝗥𝗮𝗽𝗶𝗪𝗮𝗿
@RapiWar · 69,388
#56
AKIO
@sharikjormeasli · 30,055
#57
RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,474,377
#58
Rap God News
@RapGodNews · 189,276
#59
Futball Bad Tv ⚫
@futballbadtv · 321,569
#60
RapTV
@raptv · 365,865
#61
Saman Wartan
@prodwartan · 7,819
#62
__Pokeroot__
@pookeroot · 7,955
#63
His butterfly 🦋
@tniiiy · 2,437
#64
RapCity World
@RapCityWorld · 26,634
#65
Z RAP | زد رپ
@zZRap · 62,816
#66
CIA | سیا
@Ciainthehood0 · 81 (as read 16 September 2026)
#67

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ali Geramy
@aligeramy · 47,778
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
koorowsh
@koorowshOfficial · 109,407
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
HesamTiem
@hesamtiemchannel · 83,097
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
Sajad Shahi
@sajshah · 94,823
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 August 2026
MOWJ4
@Mowj4 · 320,404
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
FootballVerse News ، جام جهانی
@FootballVerseNews · 53,407
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 1 September 2026
ویناک | Vinak
@vinak · 179,606
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 31 August 2026
420PL
@FourTwentyPlayList · 50,520
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
ᴹᴬᴶᴬᴸᴱᴴ ᴷᴼᴿᴰᴵ
@magaleh_kordi · 59,637
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
Tiem
@tiemeshon · 154,630
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 August 2026
Tijay
@tijayamin · 70,543
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Arta
@residambetashh · 53,765
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 26 August 2026
- RapRelease
@RapRelease · 77,509
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Ali Geramy
@Aliegeramy1 · 27,473
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 13 September 2026
Vinak
@VinakOfficial1 · 87,084
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
علی کرامتی | ALI KERAMATI
@noxbyak · 31,970
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 3 September 2026
Poobon
@poobon_tel · 41,547
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Tiem Crypto | سیگنال رایگان
@tiemcrypto · 354,389
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 13 August 2026
فیلترشکن تانل | V2ray_TunnelVIP
@V2ray_TunnelVIP · 20,572
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 26 September 2026
CatchyBeatz
@catchySR · 34,080
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
Pouriya Adroit
@olaghiadroit · 61,924
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
AKIO
@sharikjormeasli · 30,055
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ciainthehood” (@ciainthehood), 24,169 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ciainthehood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.