Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال حقوقی دکتر جعفری افتخار(آشنایی با رویه های مختلف قضایی)

Channel

کانال حقوقی دکتر جعفری افتخار(آشنایی با رویه های مختلف قضایی)

@majidjafarieftekhar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,626subscribers

+459 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001997110808
TypeChannel
Username@majidjafarieftekhar
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/majidjafarieftekhar

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,16714,62614,396.57 August 2026 — 14,167 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,167 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,198 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,210 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,213 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,216 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,219 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,228 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,238 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,254 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,256 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,255 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,256 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,311 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,336 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,345 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,354 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,353 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,350 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,355 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,364 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,368 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,393 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,396 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,405 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,420 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,446 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,473 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,497 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,519 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,528 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,583 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,626 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +459. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,098–14,695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:3514,626+43
16 Sept 2026, 12:5714,583+55
14 Sept 2026, 19:2114,528+9
13 Sept 2026, 06:3914,519+22
11 Sept 2026, 11:1614,497+24
8 Sept 2026, 20:3914,473+27
5 Sept 2026, 10:5914,446+26
3 Sept 2026, 13:1614,420+15
2 Sept 2026, 07:4614,405+9
1 Sept 2026, 09:2414,396+3
31 Aug 2026, 09:4314,393+25
30 Aug 2026, 07:3714,368+4
29 Aug 2026, 10:1314,364+9
28 Aug 2026, 12:4414,355+5
27 Aug 2026, 09:2414,350-3
26 Aug 2026, 06:2714,353-1
25 Aug 2026, 03:3314,354+9
23 Aug 2026, 22:2614,345+9
22 Aug 2026, 08:1814,336+25
20 Aug 2026, 19:5714,311first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 14,626 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,310
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.687%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held41 (1 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total23,140
Reactions total148
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 53s
Average length
2m 53s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

640 reactions across 33 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍51981.1%
🙏7912.3%
💯243.75%
🤔101.56%
👎81.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 640 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC≈1,540 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

. جناب آقای دکتر سلام و عرض ادب، در خصوص اعتراض به اجرائیه ثبتی از سوی ثالث ، که نظر اکثریت به صلاحیت ثبت است،خواسته پیشنهادی اثبات وقوع یا احراز وقوع بیع است، همچنان صائب است؟ بنظر حضرتعالی احراز وقوع بیع تحصیل حاصل نیست ؟ پاسخ: سلام علیکم به نظر می رسد همانطور که در نظریه معاون دادستان کل کشور در مقدمه رای وحدت رویه شماره ۷۸۴ ذکر شده دعوی صحیح الزام به تنظیم سند رسمی با دستور موقت منع نقل و انتقال و یا دعوی اثبات

🙏11

1 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 2 September 2026

گروه تبادل نظر در امور حقوقی: https://t.me/+D55kRhOFEtUzODc0

31 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC≈1,820 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⁨ . چنانچه ملک به صورت یکجا و بدون توافق بر تعیین بهای هر متر مربع فروخته شده باشد در صورت کسری متراژ خریدار صرفا حق فسخ دارد و بهای روز کسری متراژ بدون توافق متعاملین تعلق نمی گیرد #کسری_متراژ #فسخ_معامله #دادخواست_نویسی #دکتر_مجید_جعفری_افتخار⁩

👍19🤔2💯1

30 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC≈1,990 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍16🙏4

29 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC≈2,310 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

. شعبه ۱۰۰ دادگاه تجدیدنظر استان تهران: طرح هر گونه ادعا نسبت به املاک دارای سند مالکیت سبز (صادره بعد از ۱۴۰۳/۴/۳) بر اساس اسناد عادی تنظیمی بعد از تاریخ صدور سند مالکیت از جمله دعوی الزام به ثبت در سامانه کاتب غیر قابل استماع است #قانون_الزام_به_ثبت_رسمی_معاملات_اموال_غیرمنقول #سند_مالکیت_سبز_رنگ #دادخواست_نویسی #دکتر_مجید_جعفری_افتخار

👍9🙏2

29 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC≈2,360 views25 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⁨ . سلام و عرض ادب یه سوال داشتم استاد در صورتی که چک صیادی مفقود شده باشد آیا برای مطالبه وجه چک از صادر کننده ،طرح دعوی ابطال سند(چک)لازم هست یا صرفا باید وجه چک را از دادگاه بخواهیم سلام علیکم طبق ماده ۲۶۳ قانون تجارت«اگر شخصی که برات را گم کرده اعم از اینکه قبولی نوشته شده یا نشده باشد میتواند نسخه ثانی یا ثالث یا رابع الخ را تحصیل نماید پس از اثبات اینکه برات متعلق به او است میتواند با دادن ضامن تادیه وجه آن

🙏18👍6💯1

27 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈2,500 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

. چنانچه اوضاع و احوال حاکی از پرداخت در مقام ادای دین باشد دعوی استرداد وجه فیش های بانکی محکوم به بطلان است #اصل_عدم_تبرع #ماده۲۶۵_قانون_مدنی #دکتر_مجید_جعفری_افتخار #دادخواست_نویسی

👍21

27 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC≈2,750 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

✅ دستورالعمل استفاده از تضمین بدل از تضمین نقدی در مزایده‌های قوه قضاییه/ ضمانت‌نامه بانکی و صندوق‌های ضمانت دولتی قابل پذیرش است رئیس قوه قضاییه با صدور دستورالعمل نحوه استفاده از تضمین بدل از تضمین نقدی در مزایده‌های قوه قضاییه (شماره ۹۰۰/۱۱۷۹۳/۱۰۰ مورخ ۱۴۰۲/۰۷/۰۱)، به منظور تسهیل فرآیند مزایده و افزایش مشارکت عمومی، ضمانت‌نامه بانکی ریالی (صادره توسط بانک‌ها یا مؤسسات اعتباری غیربانکی دارای مجوز) و ضمانت‌نامه صاد

25 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈2,860 views36 reactionsread 2 September 2026

وب سایت شخصی دکتر جعفری افتخار راه اندازی شد به زودی مطالب حقوقی در این وب سایت بارگزاری خواهد شد: https://www.majidjafarieftekhar.ir

👍26💯6🙏4

25 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC≈3,400 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

⁨ . تمدید کلیه مهلت های قانونی تا پایان شهریور ۱۴۰۵ از سوی هیأت دولت به لحاظ شرایط جنگی آیا شامل مهلت های قانونی امور قضایی مانند مهلت سه ماهه برای صدوررو تسلیم رای داور نیز می شود؟ #مهلت_قانونی #مهلت_قضایی #دادخواست_نویسی #دکتر_مجید_جعفری_افتخار⁩

👎2

23 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC≈3,860 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

. جدیدترین رای وحدت رویه #رای_وحدت_رویه_هیئت_عمومی_دیوان_عالی_کشور #ممنوع_الخروجی #جرایم_مواد_مخدر

👍11

22 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC≈3,490 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

. نقد رای: طرح دعوی ابطال سند رسمی به طرفیت متعاملین انجام می شود و لزومی به طرف دعوی قرار دادن اداره ثبت یا دفترخانه نمی باشد #ابطال_سند_رسمی #ابطال_سند_مالکیت #نقد_رای #دکتر_مجید_جعفری_افتخار

👍21

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @majidjafarieftekhar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

گروه تخصصی کاربردی وکالت/دادگستریار(ویژه وکلا،کارآموزان)
@karaamoz · 21,994
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 September 2026
اطلاعات حقوقى و قضايى
@hoghooghivaghazaie · 48,783
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
ندای قانون وقضا| اخبار و آموزش حقوق
@nedayeqanoon · 42,287
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
کانال تست رابین هود
@testerobinhood · 83,498
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
دوره های کاربردی🎀زری وباران☔️ ۱۴۰۲
@carbordi_karamooz · 39,759
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 August 2026
حقوقی تایمز
@hoghooghitimes · 45,491
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 107,363
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026
🔵 وکلاپرس
@vokalapress · 28,554
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 9 September 2026
موسسه مشاهیردانش
@mashahiredanesh · 80,822
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
کانون وکلای مرکز
@kanoonevokalamarkaz · 21,343
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
حقوق خصوصی
@hoghough_khososi · 38,619
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال حقوقی دکتر جعفری افتخار(آشنایی با رویه های مختلف قضایی)” (@majidjafarieftekhar), 14,626 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/majidjafarieftekhar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.