Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for جستاری در حقوق خصوصی

Channel

جستاری در حقوق خصوصی

@privatelawiran1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,547subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460183679
TypeChannel
Username@privatelawiran1
Created29 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/privatelawiran1

Growth

1,5451,5471,5466 August 2026 — 1,545 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,545 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,546 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,547 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 11 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,545–1,547 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:461,547+1
13 Aug 2026, 14:381,546+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:451,545no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:451,545first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.0%
avg views ÷ 1,547 subscribers
Avg views / post
325
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 July 2026
Posts held19 (22 April 202424 July 2026)
Views total325
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5785.1%
👎68.96%
😱45.97%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2024 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC432 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @harfagencyPhoto

⚖مقاله حقوق فناوری 🇪🇺 آغاز فصل جدید قانون‌گذاری‌ها برای فضای سایبر؛ با تأکید بر قانون خدمات دیجیتال اتحادیۀ اروپا 📜 نویسندگان: ✍️ رویا معتمدنژاد 🎓 دانشیار دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی ✍️ شیوا شکرالهی 🎓 پژوهشگر دکتری حقوق عمومی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی 📇 دوفصلنامه حقوق فناوری‌های نوین (دانشگاه علم و فرهنگ) 🗓️ دوره ۷، شماره ۱۳ - بهار و تابستان ۱۴۰۵. 📌 این مقاله به بررسی یکی از مهم‌ترین تحولات ح

Signed Afshin Azizi

17 Jul 2026, 15:27 UTC449 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

همکاران عزیز در صورتیکه دادنامه ای در اختیار دارید که دعوی به دلیل ایراد شکلی رد شده است ممنون‌ می شوم جهت یک کار پژوهشی در پی وی ارسال فرمایید. @hamidnorouzi71

👍2

Signed Hamid Norouzi

4 Dec 2025, 21:07 UTC≈1,200 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Instagram.com/lexpath_edu برگزاری دوره های مهارت افزایی ویژه وکلا در شیراز و جنوب کشور برای اطلاع به صفحه اینستاگرام ما بپیوندید

👍2

Signed Hamid Norouzi

7 Jul 2025, 10:29 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

با توجه به انلاین بودن، حضور برای همه ازاد است

Signed Hamid Norouzi

10 Aug 2024, 14:46 UTC≈4,390 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

کتابی جدید در زمینه تاریخ اندیشه حقوقی به زیور طبع آراسته گردید، در این حیطه از اندیشه پیش از این دو کتاب به چاپ رسیده بود. اولی کتاب اندیشه‌های حقوقی اثر فیلیپ مالوری با ترجمه مرتضی کلانتریان و دومی کتاب تاریخ مختصر تئوری حقوقی اثر جان کلی با ترجمه دکتر محمد راسخ. کسانی که تاریخ اندیشه و فلسفه را دنبال می‌کنند به نیکی می‌دانند که "تاریخ اندیشه" در هر حیطه از دانش چقدر دارای اهمیت است و شناخت سیر اندیشه‌ها کمک می‌کن

👍5👎1

Signed Hamid Norouzi

16 Jul 2024, 17:00 UTC≈3,510 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

چند نکته برای خودمان حقوقدانان ما چگونه حقوق را می‌فهمند؟ آیا آثار و نتایجِ توجه به آکسیوم‌های حقوقی بر اجتماع را می‌توانیم فهم کنیم؟ جایگاه حقوق در فضای سیاسی ما چیست؟ حقوق ماهیت سیاسی دارد یا سیاست باید شکلی حقوقی داشته باشد؟ حقوق تکنیک و فنی است در اختیار حکمرانان تا صورتی حقوقی به فرمان‌های خود ببخشند؟ یا اینکه حقوق(نه قانون) باید به انقیاد در بیاورد حکمران را؟ چرا برخی از متفکران(چپ نو) از جمله مایک سندل، چالر

👍9

Signed Hamid Norouzi

23 Jun 2024, 12:23 UTC≈3,380 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

امکان سنجی شرط رجوع از وقف در فقه مذاهب اسلامی سعید زین الدینی دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. علی اسلامی پناه. استادیار،گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران وقف یکی از سنت‌های حسنه‌ای است که قدمتی به طول تاریخ دارد و در تمامی ادیان به عنوان نهادی که ریشه در صفات اخلاقی و انسانی داشته و دارای تاثیر به سزایی در مسائل مختلف اجتماعی بوده شناخته می‌شود.با ا

👍2

Signed Hamid Norouzi

21 Jun 2024, 09:05 UTC≈2,140 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ترجمه فارسی همین کتاب من این ترجمه را مطالعه و تورق نکرده‌ام، امیدوارم نویسنده دقت و تسلط کافی نسبت به انتقال مفاهیم را بکار برده باشد. به هر روی مطالعه‌ی نسخه اصلی یا ترجمه فارسی اکیداً توصیه می‌گردد.

Signed Hamid Norouzi

21 Jun 2024, 09:05 UTC≈2,050 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

Joseph Raz: The Concept Of Legal Seystem: Oxford 1970 مفهوم نظام حقوقی جوزف رَز که Jewish است، یکی از مهم‌ترین فیلسوفان حقوقی معاصر شناخته می‌شود و نویسنده و مؤلف یازده کتاب است. او اولین کتاب خود «مفهوم نظام حقوقی» را بر اساس تز دکترایش نگاشت. رَز را در زمره‌ی پوزیتویست‌های حقوقی می‌دانند، وی یکی از برجسته ترین شاگردان هربرت هارت است. نسخه‌ی اصلی کتاب در اختیار شما قرار داده می‌شود، متوجه شدم که سابقاً این کتاب

Signed Hamid Norouzi

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @privatelawiran1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“جستاری در حقوق خصوصی” (@privatelawiran1), 1,547 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/privatelawiran1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.