Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Макс Тесла | Физика ЕГЭ 2027 | Умскул

@tesla_phys

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,164subscribers

-214 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001196059720
TypeChannel
Username@tesla_phys
DescriptionВ этом канале ботаем ЕГЭ, есть все: теория, практика, эксперименты, новости от ФИПИ и Демидовой! Работаю 9-ый год, подготовил 75 учеников на 100, 835 на 90+, 2121 на 80+ Записаться на курс: https://clck.ru/3Q8Ynd Номер регистрации в РКН: 7822656493
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tesla_phys

Growth

31,16431,37831,2717 August 2026 — 31,378 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,328 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,303 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,222 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,191 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,183 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,164 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -214. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,132–31,410 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:2631,164-19
12 Aug 2026, 05:1231,183-8
11 Aug 2026, 07:2131,191-31
10 Aug 2026, 10:0231,222-81
9 Aug 2026, 06:4231,303-25
8 Aug 2026, 05:1431,328-50
7 Aug 2026, 10:0331,378first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.95%
avg views ÷ 31,164 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held48 (3 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total74,050
Reactions total1,826
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,130
Videos
136
Links
1,910

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,826 reactions across 48 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
65535.9%
👏26314.4%
24413.4%
🔥18610.2%
💯18510.1%
❤‍🔥432.35%
😁361.97%
😎331.81%
💘271.48%
🫡231.26%
🤩221.20%
👍211.15%
🤯140.767%
💅130.712%
🤔130.712%
🎉120.657%
👾80.438%
🥰70.383%
🏆50.274%
🤝50.274%
6 further kinds110.602%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,826reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈1,040 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

❌ Через 2 дня Летняя подготовка сгорит В любом случае пока ждем 21 августа, демо ЕГЭ 2027 покажет полную картину, там могут вылезти новые мелкие моменты. Сразу же внесу их в курс! Народ спрашивал, когда можно записаться, смотрите: Если запишетесь на сентябрь сейчас — получите в подарок Летнюю подготовку (16 вебов июля и августа, основы физики + первая тема, кинематика) Если запишетесь на сентябрь через 3 дня и дал

🫡122💘1

12 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC858 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💯113

12 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC861 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

❗️На самом деле мы уже знаем, что будет на ЕГЭ 2027, даже без демки Потому что в июле прошла Летняя школа учителей физики от МГУ, там выступала Демидова, рассказывала основные изменения в экзамене будущего года. Я туда ездил, лично задавал ей вопросы! Как и думал, по сути строение варианта не поменялось, 26 задач, такие же разделы и темы. А вот во 2 части есть перестановки (по сравнению с 2026). Обязательно сохрани

24🤩6💋2💘1

12 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC763 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
File

Для понимания, как выглядела демоверсия ЕГЭ 2026: 1️⃣ Демонстрационный вариант (он же демовариант) — показывает, как будет выглядеть работа на реальном экзамене, как может выглядеть каждая задача в варианте 2️⃣ Кодификатор — программа экзамена, содержит все разделы, темы, понятия и формулы, которые нужно знать для сдачи ЕГЭ, можно использовать как чек-лист/шпору 3️⃣ Спецификация — уточняет строение кима, какие тем

11👍3👾2💘1

12 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC878 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Внимание — на следующей неделе демо ЕГЭ 2027! Скорее всего. А может и нет) Кто не в курсе — это важнейший инфоповод августа, именно демоверсия определит строение будущего экзамена. Но никто не знает, когда она точно выйдет... Я каждый год составляю прогноз на основе прошлых лет, как выходили демки ЕГЭ и ОГЭ + отталкиваясь от съезда учителей физики в Сириусе. Итог — все признаки указывают на 21 августа!

🔥124💘1

11 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈1,390 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ну красавцы, могете! Если не поняли какой-то вопрос — решение и ответ есть в комментах Если нужна вся теория по кинематике с нуля — держите открытый веб А если надо кратко повторить эту теорию — вот конспект по кинематике Всем кайфового вечера 🤙

20🆒2

11 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈1,320 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

📊 И последнее, центростремительное ускорение ац всегда направлено перпендикулярно линейной скорости V

  1. Да80%
  2. Нет20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13🤔2

11 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,200 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

📊 Если увеличить линейную скорость V в 2 раза, то угловая скорость w тоже увеличится в 2 раза

  1. Да58%
  2. Нет42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10😎4

11 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,200 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

📊 Период обращения по окружности — это количество оборотов в секунду

  1. Да41%
  2. Нет59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤯75

11 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,210 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

📊 Линейная скорость всегда направлена по касательной к окружности

  1. Да88%
  2. Нет12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁113👌1

11 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC≈1,240 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

📊 Если тело двигается по окружности, то пройденный путь за один полный оборот будет равен 0

  1. Да26%
  2. Нет74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😎95🔥2

11 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,290 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Фух, вот я только освободился) Это у нас началась стратегическая сессия преподов, собрались в Казани, разгоняем планы на 2026-2027! А я ж собирался сегодня сделать мини-опросы про движение по окружности... Все равно делаем? Так чисто под вечерок) Если да, накидайте 💯

💯236

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @tesla_phys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz441 voters

📊 И последнее, центростремительное ускорение ац всегда направлено перпендикулярно линейной скорости V

  1. Да80%
  2. Нет20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz449 voters

📊 Если увеличить линейную скорость V в 2 раза, то угловая скорость w тоже увеличится в 2 раза

  1. Да58%
  2. Нет42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz461 voters

📊 Период обращения по окружности — это количество оборотов в секунду

  1. Да41%
  2. Нет59%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTCAnonymous Quiz466 voters

📊 Линейная скорость всегда направлена по касательной к окружности

  1. Да88%
  2. Нет12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz485 voters

📊 Если тело двигается по окружности, то пройденный путь за один полный оборот будет равен 0

  1. Да26%
  2. Нет74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTCAnonymous Poll303 voters

📊 Выберите все верные утверждения:

  1. 1) Тело А движется равноускоренно33%
  2. 2) Скорость тела А в момент t = 5 с равна 5 м/с80%
  3. 3) Тело В меняет направление движения в моменты t1 = 2 с и t2 = 8 с24%
  4. 4) В момент, когда скорость тела В обратилась в нуль, расстояние между телами А и В равно 15 м61%
  5. 5) В момент t = 2 с тело В покоится18%

The shares total 216%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 308,396 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Александр Долгих | Русский ЕГЭ 2027 | Грамотным быть модно | Умскул
@dolgih_umrus · 167,517
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Макс Тесла | Физика ЕГЭ 2027 | Умскул” (@tesla_phys), 31,164 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tesla_phys.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.