Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Гриша | ОГЭ физика | Школково

Channel

Гриша | ОГЭ физика | Школково

@GrigoriiKSHKOLKOVO

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,616subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001724039489
TypeChannel
Username@GrigoriiKSHKOLKOVO
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GrigoriiKSHKOLKOVO

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,46310,63010,546.57 August 2026 — 10,630 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,629 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,615 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,605 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,593 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,584 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,579 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,561 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,549 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,538 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,510 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,513 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,510 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,499 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,514 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,516 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,505 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,503 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,488 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,476 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,474 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,481 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,496 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,504 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,490 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,512 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,538 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,498 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,463 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,496 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,584 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,601 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,616 subscribers10,6167 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,438–10,655 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 18:0110,616+15
15 Sept 2026, 19:1810,601+17
14 Sept 2026, 03:1610,584+88
12 Sept 2026, 08:3810,496+33
10 Sept 2026, 05:2110,463-35
7 Sept 2026, 01:2110,498-40
4 Sept 2026, 07:5910,538+26
2 Sept 2026, 23:5710,512+22
1 Sept 2026, 20:1510,490-14
31 Aug 2026, 21:5610,504+8
30 Aug 2026, 18:4610,496+15
29 Aug 2026, 17:2810,481+7
28 Aug 2026, 13:5210,474-2
27 Aug 2026, 15:5210,476-12
26 Aug 2026, 18:3610,488-15
25 Aug 2026, 19:4310,503-2
24 Aug 2026, 20:1910,505-11
23 Aug 2026, 02:2810,516+2
21 Aug 2026, 12:1810,514+15
20 Aug 2026, 09:5210,499first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.42%
avg views ÷ 10,616 subscribers
Avg views / post
788
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held60 (31 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total13,394
Reactions total184
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 56s
Average length
1m 56s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

657 reactions across 60 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19629.8%
❤‍🔥15423.4%
🔥11116.9%
💘7611.6%
😍538.07%
🥰406.09%
🤣81.22%
🫡60.913%
🍓40.609%
👍40.609%
🦄20.304%
💯10.152%
🗿10.152%
😴10.152%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 657 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC306 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Повторяем теорию по механике, вспоминаем вес и силу нормальной реакции опоры🔥 Подготовка к ОГЭ по физике с Гришей

🔥4❤‍🔥3💘2

28 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC634 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня вспоминаем как найти проекции сил на наклонной плоскости🤔 Это база динамики, которая точно встретится в задачах. Картинка выше — идеальная шпаргалка. Сохраняй, чтобы не потерять! 🔥 Подготовка к ОГЭ по физике с Гришей

🔥3💘21❤‍🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC816 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🐸Где брать задания для нарешки? ⏺На платформе школково есть каталог заданий, в котором собраны все прототипы каждого номера ОГЭ по физике ⏺Если вы присоединитесь к курсу, то в феврале для вас ещё откроется МЕГАДЗ - это сборник всех прототипов задач прошлых лет по всем номерам ⏺Также не забываем про домашнее задание на курсе к каждому вебинару, которое помогает натренировать определенную тему. Если это вторая часть

4🔥2❤‍🔥1💘1🥰1😍1

26 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC830 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥51🍓1💘1😍1

26 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC850 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Разбираем ДЕМОВЕРСИЮ 2027 ПО ФИЗИКЕ Стрим вот тут Начинаем в 18:30❤️

6❤‍🔥4🔥2💘1🥰1😍1

26 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC774 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @oge_s_ksushey

РАЗБИРАЕМ ДЕМОВЕРСИЮ В ПРЯМОМ ЭФИРЕ: https://bobr.video/watch/46626209-c0b1-4571-8821-7fdeead650c7 ЖДУ ВСЕХ ❤️❤️❤️

❤‍🔥43😍2

26 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC815 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Сделали ООООЧЕНЬ приятные справочные материалы с обозначениями❤️

8❤‍🔥3😍1

26 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC762 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4🥰3💘1😍1

26 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC740 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Что-то поменялось в физике ? 🔥 Ну естественно нет) Так что работаем дальше💪

💘6❤‍🔥5🔥4

26 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC857 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

А вот чисто физика демоверсия 🔥 Разбирать будем вот тут в 18:30

🔥43❤‍🔥2

26 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC724 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

А вот и планируемые изменения подъехали🔥

🔥3❤‍🔥1💘1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @GrigoriiKSHKOLKOVO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTCAnonymous Poll94 voters

Ждем демоверсию на этой неделе?

  1. Да🔥80%
  2. Что это такое?24%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTCAnonymous Poll132 voters

Лучший злодей (супергероика) (часть 1)

  1. Дарт Вейдер29%
  2. Джокер (Хит Леджер)27%
  3. Танос33%
  4. Волан Де Морт29%
  5. Зеленый Гоблин10%
  6. Агент Смит11%
  7. Дейви Джонс5%

The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ОГЭ по математике с Настей
@nagibatorOGE · 30,789
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026
Ксюша Сумина | ОГЭ Русский язык | Школково
@oge_s_ksushey · 27,549
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
Максим Кораблев | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Физика - она везде | Умскул
@physicsisanywhere · 53,668
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Тим Гук | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Тим и Решалы | Умскул
@phys_tim · 54,334
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Азат Адеев | Физика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор
@fizikaoge · 80,225
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Никита Сахаров | Физанутые немного | Физика ЕГЭ 10 класс | Умскул
@phsah · 28,256
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Макс Тесла | Физика ЕГЭ 2027 | Умскул
@tesla_phys · 31,451
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
Егор Кант ОГЭ Обществознание 2027 Школково
@kant_soc · 54,119
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 August 2026
Егор Кант ЕГЭ обществознание
@histkant · 43,601
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гриша | ОГЭ физика | Школково” (@GrigoriiKSHKOLKOVO), 10,616 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GrigoriiKSHKOLKOVO.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.