3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 378–385 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 09:11
379
-5
18 Aug 2026, 03:32
384
no change
17 Aug 2026, 17:30
384
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
84 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5217608395250485583
16
19.0%
custom 5307683282605847292
15
17.9%
custom 5195442777705434858
12
14.3%
custom 5296713120088072147
10
11.9%
custom 5296585396350622715
9
10.7%
custom 6070988546942961515
8
9.52%
custom 5283133352621121301
7
8.33%
custom 5424972470023104089
7
8.33%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
кстати, видели новость про практическую часть на ЕГЭ по физике?
- Думаю, практическая часть появится не ранее чем через несколько лет. Нужно изучить инфраструктуру регионов, материально-техническую базу школ. В рамках нацпроектов школы получают современное лабораторное оборудование, которое можно будет использовать и для проведения практической части ЕГЭ. Но все решения - только после массового обсуждения апробации,…
Возвращаюсь к каналу, и его ждут перемены
Ежедневные викторины перестали быть живыми и стали больше похожи на спам, поэтому пока уберём их, а вместо них будут викторины покрупнее - раз в неделю и уже на конкретную тему
Пишите в комментарии, какие бы темы вы хотели увидеть. Заодно можете написать, какие ещё рубрики хотите видеть на канале 😝
Всем доброе утро ☀️
В какой среде звук не может распространяться?
В воде7%
В стали4%
В вакууме86%
В воздухе4%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @phys_gleb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Меру инертности тела — насколько трудно изменить его скорость63%
Скорость тела3%
Объём тела3%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
NASA | Физика | Астрономия @kosmos149 · 89,026 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
Тим и Решалы | Физика ОГЭ | Тим Гук и правило рук ✋ | Умскул @phys_tim · 50,451 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Азат Адеев | Физика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @fizikaoge · 69,746 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Макс Кораблев | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Физика - она везде | Умскул @physicsisanywhere · 51,883 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Астрофизика с Тим @kosmos_int · 57,153 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Физика | Глеб Суетин” (@phys_gleb), 379 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/phys_gleb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
