Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Степан Балыбин | Физика ЕГЭ и ДВИ | Профиматика

Channel

Степан Балыбин | Физика ЕГЭ и ДВИ | Профиматика

@profimatika_fizika

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,635subscribers

-1,073 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001866715119
TypeChannel
Username@profimatika_fizika
DescriptionПодготовка к ЕГЭ по физике. Чат: https://t.me/+oLOXBPZXsiUxNzEy Физика педагогам: https://t.me/physics_for_teachers YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@profimatika_fizika Отзывы: https://t.me/profimatika_feedback
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/profimatika_fizika

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,37018,70818,03917,6357 August 20266 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 91 days, net -1,073. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,169–18,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 20:4717,635+19
5 Nov 2026, 20:3617,616-6
4 Nov 2026, 22:0517,622-19
3 Nov 2026, 19:3017,641+19
2 Nov 2026, 21:3017,622+16
1 Nov 2026, 23:0917,606+18
1 Nov 2026, 01:1717,588+6
31 Oct 2026, 03:4917,582-10
30 Oct 2026, 07:0617,592-16
29 Oct 2026, 05:2917,608-6
28 Oct 2026, 00:0117,614+13
26 Oct 2026, 23:5517,601+2
25 Oct 2026, 22:2017,599+19
24 Oct 2026, 22:1017,580+4
24 Oct 2026, 00:5617,576-15
23 Oct 2026, 01:0717,591-1
21 Oct 2026, 21:1817,592-30
20 Oct 2026, 16:4817,622+8
19 Oct 2026, 18:1617,614-6
18 Oct 2026, 15:5117,620first reading

Engagement

184 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.57%
avg views ÷ 17,635 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 184 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held184 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total35,911
Reactions total571
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 04:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,830
Videos
≈224
Links
≈1,150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 06s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,313 reactions across 178 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,31056.6%
🔥1737.48%
🥰1396.01%
custom 5305273836017576886934.02%
⚡833.59%
🐳622.68%
😭552.38%
😁522.25%
❤‍🔥502.16%
🫡411.77%
💘391.69%
👍301.30%
🙏261.12%
🤯261.12%
💋200.865%
😢170.735%
🤣140.605%
✍120.519%
💯120.519%
🤝120.519%
14 further kinds472.03%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 179 of the 184 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,313 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 184 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 183 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @profimatika_fizika. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 184 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (15.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 20:01 UTC436 views18 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Мемная пятница скрасит этот вечер 🧑‍💻 Кидайте любимые мемы этой недели и настраивайтесь на хорошие выходные! @profimatika_fizika

❤18

6 Nov 2026, 13:05 UTC825 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

ПРОЖАРКА БАНКА ЗАДАЧ 😮 Сегодня мы предлагаем тебе побыть настоящим тестировщиком и устроить нашему Банку задач полноценную прожарку! Мы постоянно работаем над платформой, добавляем новые возможности и улучшаем её. Но кто лучше самих учеников заметит, что где-то что-то работает не так, непонятно устроено или просто неудобно? Поэтому предлагаем тебе хорошенько покопаться в Банке задач и найти всё, что можно улучшить…

😭3

5 Nov 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,080 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Уже видели расписание на курсе? В ноябре начинаем плотно работать с МКТ и параллельно продолжаем ботать электродинамику ❤️ Собрали всю информацию про курс здесь 🤩 Новые цены Тарифы и их отличие Все, про курс «Формула ЕГЭ» Сразу скажу, расписания не пугайтесь, необходимости ходить на все вебы нет, вы двигаетесь по своей индивидуальной траектории) Присоединяйтесь к нам!

❤5⚡2

4 Nov 2026, 18:51 UTC≈1,200 views21 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Студенты-первокурсники, я по вам скучаю! Ваши отзывы – это 💔 Записался на курс в начале января, сдал ЕГЭ по физике на 100 баллов. И таких историй у нас сотни! Кто еще не присоединился на курс «Формула ЕГЭ», вам уже надо скорее передумать, ведь через 7 месяцев на их месте уже будете вы🥺 📱 Залететь на курс в ТГ 📱 Залететь на курс в ВК

❤12🥰5🤗4

4 Nov 2026, 17:19 UTC≈1,180 views51 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Четырнадцать лет назад я был на месте нынешних 11-х классов. Отчётливо помню эти дни. Я понятия не имел, чего я хочу, кем хочу стать и зачем вообще нужно учиться. Мне просто нравились математика и физика. Я был таким же, как и вы. Молодым, наивным, незнающим, ищущим себя. Но у меня были мечты. Мечты, которые двигали меня вперёд. И это то, без чего невозможно прийти хоть куда-то. Ребята, верьте в себя. Верьте в свои …

❤30💘8🔥7❤‍🔥3🤗2🥰1

4 Nov 2026, 10:06 UTC≈1,070 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Ребята, сегодня среда, а значит – открытый веб! 🤩 Разберём баллистику в задачах №26 — одном из самых сложных номеров ЕГЭ. На вебинаре: 🥰разберём отдельный тип задач по баллистике 🥰научимся применять закон сохранения энергии и закон сохранения импульса 🥰пошагово решим задачу и разберём логику каждого действия 🎁 Всем участникам подготовил: — файл с задачами с вебинара — домашнее задание для самостоятельного решения …

❤7

4 Nov 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,040 views30 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Гравитация в СТО наглядно

❤21😁9

3 Nov 2026, 17:25 UTCviews —

Степан Балыбин | Физика ЕГЭ и ДВИ | Профиматика pinned «АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ССЫЛКИ ДЛЯ ЗАПИСИ НА КУРСЫ ⚠️ Ребята, из-за технического сбоя внешнего сервиса короткие ссылки в некоторых предыдущих постах могут временно не открываться 💔 Мы уже всё чиним, а чтобы вы не теряли время и могли в любой момент присоединиться к обучению…»

3 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,200 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026

АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ССЫЛКИ ДЛЯ ЗАПИСИ НА КУРСЫ ⚠️ Ребята, из-за технического сбоя внешнего сервиса короткие ссылки в некоторых предыдущих постах могут временно не открываться 💔 Мы уже всё чиним, а чтобы вы не теряли время и могли в любой момент присоединиться к обучению, ловите рабочие ссылки! Записаться на 7-месячный курс «Формула ЕГЭ» 👇 💙 https://clck.ru/3WqXvY 📲 https://clck.ru/3WqXuK Закрепляем этот пост, чтобы он все…

❤5

3 Nov 2026, 15:24 UTC≈1,180 views4 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

ДАЙДЖЕСТ СОБЫТИЙ В ПРОФИМАТИКЕ 🥰 Ноябрь будет насыщенным! Собрали всё, что подготовили для вас на ближайшие недели 👇 🤩 МАТЕМАТИКА Разгоняем скорость и прокачиваем первую часть профильной математики на бесплатном интенсиве «Разгон к ЕГЭ» с Игорем. С 8 по 15 ноября вас ждут: 🤩4 вебинара с Игорем 🤩12 дней практики и 60 задач 🤩собственное мини-приложение 🤩игровая система баллов и достижений 🤩магазин подарков и розыгры…

❤4

3 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,250 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

ЕГЭ 2027 – ГРОБ 😣 Составители уже обозначили, что задания № 21 и 25 будут по электродинамике. Это одна из самых сложных тем ЕГЭ по физике, и к таким заданиям точно стоит подготовиться заранее. В видео разбираем задачу, которая действительно может попасться вам на экзамене в этом году. Приятного просмотра! 📱 https://youtu.be/nlKiv03I1_Y?si=OF9Zhb0O5bOZqvFO 📱 https://vkvideo.ru/video-221373411_456240395

❤11🙏3💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 184 posts we hold for @profimatika_fizika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@profimatika_fizika edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Oct 2026, 11:46 UTCAnonymous Poll90 voters

Нарядились уже на хэллоуин? 🎃

  1. Да, кину в комменты!7%
  2. Некогда, физика не может ждать94%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTCAnonymous Poll173 voters

Опять соц. опрос 😎

  1. Дааа66%
  2. Нет, это все мифы39%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz207 voters

Тело двигалось по прямой и имело импульс 18 кг·м/с. После начала действия постоянной силы, направленной противоположно движению, через 3 с модуль импульса уменьшился до 6 кг·м/с. Чему равен модуль силы?

  1. 1 Н13%
  2. 3 Н26%
  3. 4 Н55%
  4. 8 Н6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz138 voters

Тело двигалось по прямой и обладало импульсом 8 кг·м/с по модулю. На тело начала действовать постоянная сила, направленная вдоль этой прямой. Через 4с после начала действия силы модуль импульса тела уменьшился в 2 раза. Чему был равен модуль этой силы?

  1. 1) 1 Н или 3 Н46%
  2. 2) 3 Н или 5 Н29%
  3. 3) 1 Н или 5 Н18%
  4. 4) 3 Н или 6 Н7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTCAnonymous Quiz152 voters

В инерциальной системе отсчета сила F сообщает телу массой m ускорение а. Как надо изменить массу тела, чтобы вдвое меньшая сила сообщала ему в 4 раза большее ускорение?

  1. оставить неизменной4%
  2. уменьшить в 8 раз61%
  3. уменьшить в 2 раза20%
  4. увеличить в 2 раза15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz184 voters

Если на тело действует постоянная сила F=5 Н в течение 2 с, изменение импульса тела равно:

  1. 2,5 кг*м/с24%
  2. 10 кг*м/с71%
  3. 20 кг*м/с5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 184 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Профиматика | ЕГЭ по Математике | Игорь Уколов и Влад Вуль
@profimatika · 47,311
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Твоя математичка Валя | Математика для 5-8 классов | Умскул
@valyatur · 32,140
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 8 September 2026
Никита Мешин | Экстремум | Профильная Математика
@EXtremumMath · 36,483
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
Профиматика для педагогов
@profimatika_for_teachers · 29,268
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
Саня Эбонит | Физика ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор
@sanyaebonit · 86,674
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 19 August 2026
Макс Тесла | Физика ЕГЭ 2027 | Умскул
@tesla_phys · 32,714
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 6 September 2026
Математик МГУ | Подготовка к ЕГЭ
@mathmsu · 23,047
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 September 2026
Саша Тёплая | Математика 5-8 классы | 100балльный репетитор
@teplya_sasha · 21,159
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 September 2026
ЕГЭ 2027 | ЕГЭ 100БАЛЛОВ
@egeoge100ballov · 28,089
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
Азат Адеев | Физика ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор
@fizikaoge · 92,729
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Никита Сахаров | Физанутые немного | Физика ЕГЭ 10 класс | Умскул
@phsah · 29,512
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 September 2026
Максим Кораблев | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Физика - она везде | Умскул
@physicsisanywhere · 58,572
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Вика Ланская | Информатика ЕГЭ 2027 | ИнфаВикуся | Умскул
@infa_vikusya · 47,009
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
Тим Гук | Физика ОГЭ 2027 | Тим и Решалы | Умскул
@phys_tim · 59,894
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Степан Балыбин | Физика ЕГЭ и ДВИ | Профиматика” (@profimatika_fizika), 17,635 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profimatika_fizika.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.