Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

운송이의 주식 스터디

@tenbeggers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

273subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003822458919
TypeChannel
Username@tenbeggers
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tenbeggers

Growth

273274273.57 Aug 2026, 18:21 — 274 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:46 — 274 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 17:46 — 273 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:218 Aug 2026, 17:46
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 273–274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 17:46273-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:46274no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:21274first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.2%
avg views ÷ 273 subscribers
Avg views / post
77.1
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,388
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👀222.2%
👍222.2%
🤪222.2%
🥰222.2%
🤣111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC128 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

아는 사람은 안다는 추억의 개잡주 아쿠아바운티 $AQB 연어양식하는 회사인데 이번에 데이터센터 진출 고려한다는 뜬끔없는 소식 발표 https://www.salmonbusiness.com/salmon-farm-or-server-farm-aquabounty-weighs-ai-pivot/ 몇 달전, 그저 망해가던 신발 브랜드 회사던 올버즈 $BIRD가 데이터센터 업종 전환 발표 후 주가가 무려 장 중 700% 이상 상승했던 적이 있었던 만큼 이번 개잡주인 $AQB에 얼마나 파급력이 올지 궁금.. 다만, 상당히 하이리스크인건 맞기에 한다면 소액으로만 (수십만원) 즐기는게 나을듯

🥰2

7 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC40 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @FastStockNewsUSAPhoto

속보: 🇷🇺🇺🇸 미국 정보당국에 따르면 러시아가 나토의 군사력을 시험하기 위해 잠재적인 공격을 계획하고 있는 것으로 드러났습니다.

7 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026

- SK하이닉스, 청주 M17 공장에 19조 1천억 원 투자 예정 - SK하이닉스, 용인 FAB 2에 35조 2천억 원 투자 예정

7 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @darthacking

2026.08.07 15:57:11 기업명: SK하이닉스(시가총액: 1,038조 7,601억) A000660 보고서명: 현금ㆍ현물배당결정 배당구분 : 분기배당( 현금 ) * 배당금 보통주 : 375원(현재가1,422,000원) 기타주 : * 배당률 보통주 : 0.02% 기타주 : 기준일 : 2026-08-31 지급일 : - 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260807800589 회사정보: https://finance.naver.com/item/main.nhn?code=000660

🤣1

7 Aug 2026, 05:24 UTC37 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @teamctrine

여의도 찌라시) 1. 지금 HBM3E는 닉스가 헐값에 엔비디아에 주고 있음. 연간 고정가라 전자는 범용 가격인상 팍팍해서 실적 좋은데 닉스는 분기별 이익 증가폭이 상대적으로 낮은 이유임. 2. HBM4는 닉스 불량 때문에 엔비디아에서 베라루빈 출시 지연된게 맞음 3. 엔비디아향 HBM4 스크닉스 내년 가격 인상폭 타 업체대비 낮을 듯(타업체 80% 이상 인상, 닉스는 50% 인상) 4. 대신 SK그룹에서 진행하는 데이터센터사업은 엔비디아칩 우선공급권 얻음 5. 이 얘기를 SK하이닉스 영업직원이 술자리에서 푸념함 6. SK하이닉스 출신 애널리스트 채민숙이 이 얘기를 듣고 여의도에 던짐 7. 7월 닉스 떡락 & SK 및 이터닉스 상한가 8. SK하이닉스에서 전말확인 후 채민숙 출입 밴함. 9. 매니저들이 다른 애널들 시켜서 사실

👍2

6 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC59 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @stockhub_wire

[Walter Bloomberg] WARSH, 9월 금리 인상 가능성 열어둬 • FT 보도에 따르면, 연준 이사 케빈 워시가 다가오는 인플레이션 데이터가 예상보다 • 높게 나오고 시장이 대출 비용 상승에 대한 기대를 높일 경우 9월에 금리를 인상할 준비가 되어 있다고 전해졌다. 📰원문/번역 🏦연준 관찰 📲앱 다운로드

6 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC80 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

네임드 중에선 거의 유일하게 오르는 유니티

6 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC79 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

오늘 실적나온 종목들 전원 멸망… 어째 나오는 족족 나락만 가는중

6 Aug 2026, 00:28 UTC45 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bornlupin

이재명 대통령, 호남반도체 직접 챙긴다 “임기내 착공, 임기내 반도체 생산까지” 이재명 대통령이 호남권 반도체 클러스터의 빠른 추진을 위해 오는 10일 오후 2시 청와대에서 3대 메가프로젝트 2차 민관합동 점검회의를 직접 주재한다. 반도체 산업의 핵심요소로 뽑히는 전력과 용수 여기에 정주여건 준비사항 들이 구체화된 수치로 나올지 관심사다. 특히 광주군공항 이전 후보지인 무안군이 재협상 카드를 꺼내든 상황에서 이 문제를 어떻게 해결할지도 지역내 핫이슈다. 2차 회의에는 산업통상자원부와 국방부, 국토교통부, 기후에너지환경부 등 관계부처가 총출동한다. 지난달 6일 첫 회의 이후 한 달여 만에 다시 열리는 후속 점검 자리다. 회의에는 산업통상부와 국방부, 국토교통부, 기후에너지환경부 등 관계부처와 삼성전자·SK하이닉스 등 참여 기업 관계자들

👀2🤪2

5 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC59 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @aetherjapanresearch

관세 '벼랑 끝 전술'의 폭풍을 무사히 넘긴 베센트는 갈수록 목소리를 높였고, 심지어 투지가 넘쳐흘렀다. 관세 유예 조치가 내려진 지 일주일 뒤, 일론 머스크의 무법 질주를 알리는 기괴한 종막이자, 집무실 한복판에서 벌어지는 전대미문의 충돌이 기다리고 있었다. 머스크가 제멋대로 국세청(IRS) 임시 청장을 해고하고 자기 사람을 그 자리에 앉힌 것이 화근이었다. 국세청을 반 토막 내겠다는 심산이었다. 법적으로 국세청을 총괄하는 베센트는 이 월권행위를 도저히 묵과할 수 없었고, 인내심도 바닥을 드러냈다. 억만장자와 재무장관의 말싸움은 순식간에 걷잡을 수 없이 격해졌다. "좆같은 새끼(Fuck you)!" 재무장관이 억만장자를 향해 쌍욕을 날렸다. 머스크가 베센트에게 얼굴을 들이밀며 조롱했다. "안 들리는데? 더 크게 말해봐!" "좆까 이

5 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC78 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @stockhub_wire

[속보] 중국, 미국으로의 드론 수출 통제 강화 📰원문/번역 📊시장 현황 📲앱 다운로드

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tenbeggers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“운송이의 주식 스터디” (@tenbeggers), 273 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tenbeggers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.