Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ziyao Channel | 二代目

Channel

Ziyao Channel | 二代目

@ziyao233channel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,141subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001570578195
TypeChannel
Username@ziyao233channel
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ziyao233channel

Growth

1,1401,1411,140.56 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,141 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,141 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,140–1,141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 11:181,141+1
14 Aug 2026, 02:061,140-1
10 Aug 2026, 19:371,141+1
7 Aug 2026, 15:121,140no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:041,140first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.1%
avg views ÷ 1,141 subscribers
Avg views / post
378
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (28 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total7,175
Reactions total90
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏2628.9%
😁2325.6%
🤣1213.3%
910.0%
🥰910.0%
😢55.56%
😭44.44%
11.11%
👍11.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC162 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @integral_channel

https://www.phoronix.com/news/AMD-openSIL-Phoenix-AM5-PR

Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD

6 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC290 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

15 年前的机器叫电子垃圾, 50 年前的叫文物

😁15

Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD

4 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC193 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

FFmpeg 9.0版本刚发布了。这个版本的代号是“Lei” 按照惯例,“Lei” 应该是哪个计算机科学家/数学家,可想了好久也对不起来这是谁。 查了一下FFmpeg的开发邮件列表,才发现原来是纪念已故的@雷霄骅 [蜡烛]。 他在 2013–2016 年间撰写了大量 FFmpeg API、源码分析及音视频编解码、封装和传输协议方面的中文教程与示例,帮助许多中国开发者入门音视频和 FFmpeg。于 2016 年疑似因过劳突然离世。 今年是离世10周年,FFmpeg用了这个大版本号来纪念他。 ▎Source

🙏26😢31

Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD

4 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC337 viewsread 6 August 2026

Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 18:29:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo <[email protected]> To: lua-l <[email protected]> Subject: [ANN] Lua 5.5.1 now available [-- Attachment #1 --] [-- Type: multipart/alternative, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 3.5K --] Lua 5.5.1 has been frozen and is now the current release of Lua 5.5. Lua 5.5.1 fixes all bugs listed in https://www.lua.org/bugs.html#5.5.0 Lua 5.5.1 is a

Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD

3 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC419 viewsread 6 August 2026

打开 memtest.org ,立刻 PASS[1]。 [1]: PASS 仅为对内存与控制器状态的描述,取决于您的设备,也可能 FAIL。

Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD

3 Aug 2026, 06:12 UTC389 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

我双 PASS 了.webp

Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD

2 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC386 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

我觉得我已经成了无情的 pick and place 机器

1

Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD

2 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC369 viewsread 6 August 2026

bilibili.com/BV1henFzQESV 笑死我了

Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD

1 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC362 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ 修了下文章中提到的基线问题, 感觉维护者会绷不住

Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD

1 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC357 viewsread 6 August 2026

决定了, 我明年要打苦痛之路速通

Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD

1 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC355 viewsread 6 August 2026

就是笔记本 hjkl 四个键寿命堪忧了

Signed 梓瑶 | csrxchg %0, CSR_CRMD

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ziyao233channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 278,419 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ziyao Channel | 二代目” (@ziyao233channel), 1,141 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ziyao233channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.