Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tariq B. Abdul Lateef

Channel

Tariq B. Abdul Lateef

@tariqalmaliki

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,190subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002117412507
TypeChannel
Username@tariqalmaliki
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tariqalmaliki

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1741,1901,1826 August 2026 — 1,176 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,176 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,177 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,180 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,174 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,175 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,180 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,178 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,183 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,190 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 43 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,172–1,192 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:211,190+7
14 Sept 2026, 09:181,183+5
10 Sept 2026, 22:381,178-2
5 Sept 2026, 15:191,180+5
1 Sept 2026, 05:251,175+1
28 Aug 2026, 21:421,174-6
19 Aug 2026, 16:281,180+3
10 Aug 2026, 15:571,177+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:281,176no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:051,176first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

317 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
27586.8%
👍185.68%
🔥144.42%
😢72.21%
💯20.631%
🤣10.315%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC125 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @krashaad

ادفن وجودك في أرض الخمول، فما نبت مما لم يدفن لا يتم نتاجه “Bury your existence in the soil of obscurity, for whatever grows without first being buried never reaches full fruition.” - Ibn ʿAṭāʾ Allāh al-Sakandarī Is your work capable of surviving attention? Some of your most consequential work should develop away from public visibility. Learn to retreat, put your head down and work (family, work and community init

9

5 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC164 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @alhawza0alasharia

«واعلم أن جميع اليهود في أصول التوحيد: فريقان؛ فريقٌ منهم المشبِّهة، وهم الأصل في التَّشبيه؛ وكلُّ من قال قولًا في دولة الإسلام بشيءٍ من التَّشبيه فقد نسج على منوالهم، وأخذ مقالةً من مقالهم الروافض وغيرهم ، ولهذا قال النبي ﷺ: "الروافض يهود هذه الأمة"؛ لأنهم أخذوا التشبيه من اليهود». التبصير لأبي إسحاق الإسفراييني (ص:126).

1

4 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC187 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @saleemseedat

Also, beneficial to read Mufti Shafi/Rafi and Shaykh Qaradawi's works on the subject. Also, found an interesting passage in Shaykh Mustafa Sabri's Mawqif al-Aql where he says; in comparison to Roman and French law, that the 'asas' of the Shari'ah is 'hurriyat al-fard' or individual freedom (as default) (vol.4, pg.268). Hence, Zakah, Nafaqah and other obligations are exceptions to the rule. #Economics #Islam #Social

3

3 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC749 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Neither Socialism nor Capitalism Imam Wahbah Al Zuhayli among his many works has a short but meticulous comparison of Islamic economics, capitalism, and socialism in his encyclopedic work Islamic Fiqh and Its Evidences. Among the brilliant points he makes: ولا يمكن القول بأن نظام الإسلام الاقتصادي نظام رأسمالي أو اشتراكي؛ لأن للرأسمالية أو الاشتراكية في الوقت الحاضر معنى محددا مفهوما، له خصائص معينة في معالجة الحي

4

3 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC197 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @theologyandgeopoliticsVideo

Imam Wahbah al Zuhayli Imam Wahbah al Zuhayli (1932-2015, may Allāh be pleased with him) was a truly amazing man. Widely regarded by all his peers as a giant of our era. In this clip he talks a bit about his scholarly journey and intellectual output. He was a both Faqih (jurist) and Mufassir (exegete) par excellence. Driven by his desire to aid the religion of Allāh, he decided early on that writing was the best wa

10

29 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC365 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @musingsfawaid

Imām al-Dhahabī (r) said, ❝It is Allah’s way that whoever demeans the scholars is left low & insignificant.❞ Tārīkh al-Islām wa Wafayāt al-Mashāhīr wa al-Aʿlām, vol. 13, p. 256

😢65

18 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC604 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @tabrazePhoto

THE DUTY TO SPREAD SACRED KNOWLEDGE Imam Malik has a serious statement whereby he expressed that the scholars will be asked about their spreading of knowledge just as the prophets will be asked. And some of the scholars have expressed that traversing the bridge on the Day of Resurrection is actually happening right now given that it is in accordance with actions. Thus the student of knowledge should take heed; if he

20🤣1😢1

15 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC≈1,140 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Incredibly important video. False shaykhs are everywhere and even advanced students can fall into the trap. The measure is always the shariah and that is just one of the reasons it’s important to ground yourself in basic fiqh and see if the shuyūkh making the claim upholds it completely. No one is above the Divine Moral Code. Imam Al-Akhdari said: إذا رأيت رجلا يطير *** أو فوق ماء البحر قد يسير ولم يقف عند حدود ا

21🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC473 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @jamaal_diwan

https://youtu.be/FtoAe4d9dCY?is=PQvzqopoSPFu8AoJ

6

13 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC476 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @theologyandgeopoliticsPhoto

“Truth has to be repeated constantly, because Error also is being preached all the time, and not just by a few, but by the multitude. In the Press and Encyclopaedias, in Schools and Universities, everywhere Error holds sway, feeling happy and comfortable in the knowledge of having Majority on its side” -Johan Wolfgang von Goethe [n.b. Ref- Johan Peter Eckermann, Gespräche mit Goethe in den letzten Jahren seines Lebe

16

12 Jul 2026, 02:01 UTC502 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Istihsān is distinctive usuli tool of the Malikis and Hanafis but their usage differs. The Malikis do it by maslahah. (The Shafiis do not do istihsān at all.) Ibn Ul-ʿArabi says: In our view, as well as that of the Hanafis, Istihsan (juristic preference) is the act of applying the stronger of two pieces of evidence. When a general ruling (‘umum) is consistent, or a analogy (qiyas) is uniform, both Malik and Abu Ha

13👍1

11 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC449 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @jamaal_diwan

Shaykh Abd Al-Qadir al-Jilani on material possessions: “You may allow it to stand at the door of your heart, but it is prohibited to allow it to get inside, for it shall not bring any honor to you.”

21👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tariqalmaliki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tariq B. Abdul Lateef” (@tariqalmaliki), 1,190 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tariqalmaliki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.