Channel
@tabraze
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,796subscribers
+30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001484532246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tabraze |
| Created | 4 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tabraze |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 2,796 | +5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 2,791 | +4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 2,787 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 2,788 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 2,786 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 2,783 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 2,779 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 2,783 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 2,781 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 2,777 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 2,774 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 2,766 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 2,766 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
311 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 268 | 86.2% | |
| 😢 | 17 | 5.47% | |
| 😁 | 16 | 5.14% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 1.61% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.965% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.322% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.322% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
AL-TAHTAWI ON KEEPING THE CLOSE COMPANY OF A TEACHER In his collection of licenses, al-Sayyid Ahmad al-Tahtawi (d. 1231)–author of the marginalia on the Maraqi al-falah and al-Durr al-mukhtar–begins by mentioning that one cannot truly attain unto fiqh without keeping the close company of a teacher. He then he proceeds to mention one of his teachers, Muhammad al-Hariri (d. 1220), who was the one whom he would return …
❤19
Sa‘īd al-Halabī's Ijāzah to his student Ibn ‘Abidīn
❤14
GAZAN HANAFIS KEEPING MATURIDISM ALIVE & WELL The treatises of Shaykh Sharaf al-Din b. ʿAbd al-Qadir (aka Ibn Habib al-Ghazzi) (d. ~1027), student of Tumurtashi (d. ~1007) and Ibn Ghanim al-Maqdisi (d. 1004), were recently published, and it was nice to see that he explicitly describes himself as being Maturidi. This is noteworthy as presence in the Levant or Egypt did not automatically make the Hanafis into Ashʿaris…
❤16
ON HAVING REAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH LIVING TEACHERS “This generation has been deprived of the blessing of taking from scholars and remaining closely in their company.“ «هذا الجيل حرم بركة الأخذ عن العلماء وملازمة العلماء» — الشيخ محمد وائل الحنبلي
😢14❤10
THE WASIYYA OF IMAM ABU HANIFA TO YUSUF AL-SAMTI This reading of the Wasiyya of Imam Abu Hanifa to Yusuf al-Samti was covered during the final session at the recent Hanafi intensive in Leicester (UK), and it is a lesson which summarises the art of transmitting knowledge to people and the kind of heart which is required to do it properly. Alhamdulillah, I’m grateful to have had the opportunity to reflect over these b…
❤14👍1
يقولون: تكلم حتى أراك! وأقول للطالب: اسأل حتى أراك! الأسئلة كاشفة عن عقل المتكلم كثيرًا.
❤6🔥3
الفتوى في الوثائق العثمانية .......................... هي نوع من أنواع الوثائق، تتكون من مسألة وجواب، ولها أركان كبقية الوثائق العثمانية، منها: الدعوة مثل: اللهم يا ملهم الحق والصواب نسألك العصمة في السؤال والجواب، والسؤال أي المسألة المراد معرفتها، ثم الجواب أي الرد على السؤال المقدم للمفتي، ويكون مختصرًا، مثل: يجوز، لا يجوز، الله أعلم. وتُستخدم أسماء معينة في الفتوى على لسان السائل وهي: زيد للرجل وهند للمرأة. وهذه …
❤4
A NEW LEAF FOR MANKIND: AI BOOK “EXECUTIONS” To feed the machine, they have been guillotining [that’s beheading for books] books one after the other. A frightening sight for the bibliophile, and another reason to make your own home library before the system owns and controls all human knowledge, and then dictates to you when and how often you are allowed to access it. There is good in digitalisation (even if only fr…
😱5😢3❤1
https://www.openmadrasa.org/read/sadral-sharia
❤7
GHAZALI’S MINHAJ AL-MUTAʿALLIM? There are many manuscripts floating around of a work titled Minhaj al-mutaʿallim, and some of them ascribe the text to Imam al-Ghazali. In fact, Dar al-Taqwa actually published the text with his name in 2010. After a brief perusal, it is obvious that the text was not authored by Imam al-Ghazali. The text draws heavily from Zarnuji’s Taʿlim al-mutaʿallim, so it naturally includes many …
❤23
MIRʾAT AL-TALIBIN — A NEWLY PUBLISHED COMMENTARY ON TAʿLIM AL-MUTAʿALLIM Imam Zarnuji’s seminal text is essential reading for the serious student of knowledge, especially if he is a Hanafi. The details and wisdoms recorded therein are so important that one would have genuinely missed out if they never studied it. The purpose is not simply to gloss over its contents but to be transformed by its guidance and light-fil…
❤22
عن سيدنا عثمان بن عفان - رضي الله عنه- قال: قيّدوا العلم. قيل: وما تقييده؟ قال: علّموا، وتعلّموا، واستنسخوه؛ فإنه يوشك أن يذهب العلماء، ويبقى القرّاء لا تجاوز قراءةُ أحدهم تراقيه! #منهجيات #أهل_العلم
❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tabraze. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tabraze Azam” (@tabraze), 2,796 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tabraze.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.