https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UZHjiuXfN4
❤3

Channel
@HarunSalehMaliki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,862subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001817168375 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HarunSalehMaliki |
| Created | 30 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HarunSalehMaliki |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:37 | 1,862 | -7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 1,869 | +4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 1,865 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 1,864 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:12 | 1,858 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 1,856 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 1,854 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 1,856 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 1,854 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 1,856 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:11 | 1,855 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:50 | 1,848 | +7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 1,841 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
320 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 193 | 60.3% | |
| 💯 | 72 | 22.5% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 11.9% | |
| ⚡ | 9 | 2.81% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 1.56% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.938% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 320 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UZHjiuXfN4
❤3
There needs to be a ban on people who can't write above the level of a middle schooler from creating any type of Islamic content.
❤21👍6🔥5
The author of "Lub al Azhaar fi Sharh al Anwaar" said, "From sinister intentions is to seek knowledge to boast around the scholars, or to argue with fools, or to grab people's attention because all of this is the opposite of what was commanded. The requested outcome of learning knowledge is to act by it in one's own life or to teach the ignorant or to guide the misguided and what is similar to that." From Umdat al T…
💯10❤8
An example of why I have concerns with “mental health awareness.” The idea is kind and makes sense: people have disorders, let’s find them and treat them. But in practice, you get things like this. Healthy young adults attended an ADHD awareness workshop. Before the workshop: 28% already believed they had ADHD. After: 58% despite no increase in symptoms. (The same paper tested a “nocebo education” that reduced th…
👍6❤1
File, posted without a caption
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6
https://archive.org/details/MNouria/page/38/mode/1up
❤2
A large part of the reason we have complete fools representing Islam is that a lot of Muslims are actually following them. If they didn’t have a following they wouldn’t be in a position to represent. We need a hard look at every single so called “dawah person” and probably need to de platform the majority of them. This can only happen with proper education.
💯25❤7
الْمَقَاصِدُ الضَّرُورِيَّةُ فِي الشَّرِيعَةِ أَصْلٌ لِلْحَاجِيَّةِ وَالتَّحْسِينِيَّةِ. فَلَوْ فُرِضَ اخْتِلَالُ الضَّرُورِيِّ بِإِطْلَاقٍ، لَاخْتَلَّا بِاخْتِلَالِهِ بِإِطْلَاقٍ، وَلَا يَلْزَمُ مِنِ اخْتِلَالِهِمَا [أَوِ اخْتِلَالِ أَحَدِهِمَا] اخْتِلَالُ الضَّرُورِيِّ بِإِطْلَاقٍ، نَعَمْ، قَدْ يَلْزَمُ مِنِ اخْتِلَالِ التَّحْسِينِيِّ بِإِطْلَاقٍ اخْتِلَالُ الْحَاجِيِّ بِوَجْهٍ مَا، وَقَدْ يَلْزَمُ مِنِ اخْتِلَالِ…
❤7
More advice on OCD from Ibn Daqīq al-Id: (٢) «قال ابن دقيق العيد في «شرح الإلمام»: والفرق بين الورع والوسواس دقيق عَسِر، فالمتساهل يجعل بعض الورع وسواسا، والمتشدد يجعل بعض الوسواس ورعا، والصراط المستقيم بينهما منزلة...» The difference between scrupulousness wara' and baseless misgivings waswās is subtle and difficult. The lax person treats some aspects of scrupulousness as misgivings, while the strict person treats…
👍7❤4
Imagine studying with one of the greatest scholars ever to live, spending many years studying, yet still not being qualified to spread knowledge. Al Haarith ibn Asad was one of the students of Imam Malik and was known to be someone whose duas were consistently accepted by Allah. He reports that when he, Ibn al Qaasim, and Ibn Wahb were saying their farewells to Imam Malik, they asked for advice, so Imam Malik said t…
❤45🤯3👍2
Words matter, but how you understand them matters more. Imam al-Baydawi in his Minhaaj mentions five linguistic factors that can impair one's understanding of texts. They are Ishtirak (when one word has multiple meanings) Naql (semantic transfer) Majaz (metaphor) Idmaar (ellipsis—meaning an implied omitted word) Takhsis (specification) A simple example of this is in the Qur'an Allah says (and He forbade ribaa) I…
❤16👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HarunSalehMaliki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Harun Saleh” (@HarunSalehMaliki), 1,862 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HarunSalehMaliki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.