Channel
@musingsfawaid
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
964subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003308944343 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @musingsfawaid |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/musingsfawaid |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 964 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 964 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,985 |
| Reactions total | 161 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
487 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 390 | 80.1% | |
| 🔥 | 45 | 9.24% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 4.31% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 3.29% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 1.23% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.411% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.411% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.205% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.205% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.205% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.205% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.205% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 487reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
To remember, or to be reminded? That is the question… For simplicity, take the sentence, “The training of the driver was expensive.” Depending on what was intended, it could mean that training the driver himself was expensive, or that the training service provided by the driver was expensive. In the first instance, the driver is the object in meaning; in the second, he is the subject. In Arabic grammar, the first i…
❤16
Last post for the week, if you would lend an ear ... a quote I wish to share. But brief word before the quote: Imām al-Rāzī (r) is not saying that every theological position held by Muslims is equally sound. He says plainly & clearly that some were mistaken and others were right. He is asking us to notice something else though, which is: even when Muslim scholars went wrong, they were often trying to defend what t…
❤27🔥5
Often, we forget duʿāʾs we once had a special bond with at particular phases of our lives… duʿāʾs we have since abandoned. Then, in one of those quiet ways, you are reminded to return to them. A few days ago I just happened to be reflecting on the āyah: هو الذي أنزل عليك الكتاب منه آيات محكمات هن أم الكتاب وأخر متشابهات فأما الذين في قلوبهم زيغ فيتبعون ما تشابه منه … الآية As my thoughts passed over the word زيغ,…
❤20
Imām al-Dhahabī (r) said, ❝It is Allah’s way that whoever demeans the scholars is left low & insignificant.❞ Tārīkh al-Islām wa Wafayāt al-Mashāhīr wa al-Aʿlām, vol. 13, p. 256
❤16
Another subtle point in Sūrat al-Ikhlāṣ: Why is the Divine Name “Allah” repeated in the first two verses? Allah says: قُلْ هُوَ اللَّهُ أَحَدٌ Then He says: اللَّهُ الصَّمَدُ When you pause over it, the verses could have simply been: “Allah is Aḥad. He is al-Ṣamad.” But instead, the Divine Name is repeated: “Allah is Aḥad. Allah is al-Ṣamad.” Abū al-Suʿūd (r) explains that this repetition of the Divine Name…
❤11🔥4
A subtle point in Sūrat al-Ikhlāṣ: Allah says قُلْ هُوَ اللَّهُ أَحَدٌ The word أحد comes without ال Then Allah says اللَّهُ الصَّمَدُ The word الصمد comes with ال Why? Abū al-Suʿūd (r) explains that الصمد comes definite because they already knew Allah’s ṣamadiyyah, unlike His aḥadiyyah. Meaning: they had some recognition that Allah is the One ultimately turned to in need. Their error was not that they denied …
🔥20❤9👍2
Reading is a process of slowing down. Your mind is moving too fast. Think of it as resistance training. Not everything is about speed. One phrase at a time, one sentence at a time, one paragraph at a time, one page at a time. Slow down.
❤24👍6💯1
❝I've been reflecting on why I believe in the Qur’an and this is the best I've come up with so far. When is it that you learn to trust a friend or a loved one? I don't believe one is able to point to an instance or some fact that establishes it with the certainty one has in the love and honesty of a close friend or relation. For me, belief, which is trust in the truthfulness of the Qur’an, emerges from the totality o…
❤16🤨1
Reading a book is like having a conversation. The author is the speaker, and you are the listener. If, in a real conversation, you are absent-minded, or your thoughts are constantly being pulled elsewhere, you will find yourself having to politely ask the person to repeat himself again and again, because you keep zoning out. Reading is no different. If you are reading a book and you cannot understand a particular …
❤25👍1👎1
One of the ugliest things I have seen online Muslim personalities adopt is this… when they are discussing or refuting someone they have fallen out with, they depict the other person with the ugliest possible face as the thumbnail. They make the eyes look sinister, add an evil smile, or edit the face so realistically that you would think it was real. This is not befitting even against a disbeliever, let alone a fell…
❤25💯9👍3🔥1
A word of advice to those who hope to teach one day Shaykh Dr. al-Bashīr ʿIṣām al-Murrākushī (ḥ) says: ❝One of the mistakes made by some who step forward to teach the Islamic sciences is this: A person studies a text, masters it, and then assumes that he is able to teach it. The correct approach is that you cannot teach a text unless you have mastered what lies above it, even if only by one level. For example, i…
❤28🔥5👍1
Its not "how are you doing?" ... its "how are you handling it?"
❤13🔥2😢2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @musingsfawaid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 382,076 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Musings & Fawāʾid — Abdullah Wafi” (@musingsfawaid), 964 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/musingsfawaid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.