Channel
@howship
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,448subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001699500347 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @howship |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/howship |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 2,448 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 2,449 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:22 | 2,448 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 2,452 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (1 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,971 |
| Reactions total | 396 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
593 reactions across 11 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 150 | 25.3% | |
| 😁 | 87 | 14.7% | |
| 🎉 | 71 | 12.0% | |
| 💯 | 55 | 9.27% | |
| 🤯 | 40 | 6.75% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 5.40% | |
| 🤣 | 29 | 4.89% | |
| custom 6021410012868381942 | 27 | 4.55% | |
| 🙈 | 21 | 3.54% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 3.04% | |
| 😱 | 16 | 2.70% | |
| 🍾 | 12 | 2.02% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 0.843% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 0.675% | |
| 🤪 | 4 | 0.675% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.506% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.506% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 0.506% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 0.506% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.506% | |
| 5 further kinds | 7 | 1.18% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 593reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @howship. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Угадайте, какой продукт Яндекс является одним из самых рентабельных продуктов? Яндекс Погода небольшая команда + нет дорогого «обслуживания» продукта + огромная аудитория + реклама Вы очень недооценивали этот продукт, скорее всего А бесконечная рекламная лента — гениальное решение. Никому не мешает, а трафик несет А вы про какой продукт изначально подумали?)
❤24✍5custom 60214100128683819425💯3🤪2🌚1
Ищу редактора и продакт менеджера к себе в команду Лояльности в Магнит, а именно, в команду подписки Магнит Премиум 🛍 Сначала про UX редактора: 1) Тесная работа со мной в первую очередь, но так же задачи из всей Лояльности. 2) У нас очень приятные все дизайнеры, все прям крутышки, поэтому будет комфортно 3) Ценим мнения редакторов и прислушиваемся к ним 4) Крутая команда редакторов, лид супер пупер Откликаться здес…
🔥14❤10custom 60214100128683819429👾1🤣1
Мы дошли до стадии, когда открыть Telegram и не увидеть очередной пост про вайбкодинг – редкость (последний пост здесь тому подтверждение) 🐸 Хайпа вокруг AI хватает. Но чем больше такого контента, тем сильнее хочется посмотреть не очередное мнение, а чей-то реальный рабочий процесс. Из всего, что попадалось за последнее время, этот эфир зацепил больше всего. 😎 6 августа в 17:00 мск Даниил Шишко из Pixel Perfect по…
❤10🔥6😁6🥰3👾1🤯1🤷1😭1
Токсичность токсичность токсичность ааааааааааа Вот за что я люблю телеграмм, здесь как будто самая адекватная аудитория со всех сторон. В каналах, в чатах. Скорее всего, это связано с отсутствием рекомендаций. Я не состою в супер токсичных сообществах))) Но в линкедин, в запрещеннограмме и других соцсетях, регулярно натыкаюсь и сама сталкиваюсь с токсичностью И я этому правда удивлена. Почему у людей, порой, отс…
🤯24🙈12😁7❤4💯3😢3🔥2
Теперь я официально продакт 🧑🎓 Получила диплом магистра ВШЭ высшей школы бизнеса по направлению управление цифровым продуктом!!! Это было очень сложное испытание: фулл тайм работа, свои проекты, преподавание математики и дизайна И МАГИСТРАТУРА Писала диплом сама, больше месяца (пришлось брать учебный отпуск, иначе я бы не вывезла) Это было сложное испытание, я очень рада, что справилась. И теперь у меня много др…
🎉71❤39🍾12🔥6🏆3custom 60214100128683819422
Авито планируют запустить свое дейтинг приложение 🤭 Пока нигде не было официальных заявлений этой новости, но источники указывают, что такие планы действительно есть) «Авито» будет использовать в новом сервисе все те механики, которые уже доказали свою эффективность на основной площадке,— трехступенчатую систему модерации, безопасные каналы коммуникаций, инструменты верификации, в том числе в интеграции с внешними …
❤22🤣10custom 60214100128683819424🔥2😱2🤯1
Дизайн Яндекс банка, если бы не было рекламных паттернов в интерфейсах На главном экране, сразу самые важные действия пользователя. Чисто, понятно)) А погодите, это же я откопала старый скрин, первой версии Яндекс Пэя 😁 Представьте, какие раньше были чистые интерфейсы, а то мы уже что-то забыли. Надо Ozon старые версии поискать)) Или у кого-то есть?
💯36😢15❤9🤝2custom 60214100128683819421
Фаст трек в Revolut для дизайнеров Hiring Sprint Мы сократили наш обычный процесс найма до одного ускоренного этапа, так как ищем амбициозных Product Designer. Как проходит Hiring Sprint: • Подайте заявку до 19 июля. • Если вашу заявку отберут, вы получите инструкции по выполнению домашнего задания. • При желании посетите наш вебинар 15 июля, где расскажут о лучших практиках выполнения домашнего задания. • Если в…
😱14❤8👏3🔥2custom 60214100128683819422👍1💘1😁1
Теперь редфлаг в портфолио не только ноушн, но и необычный курсор 😁 Самое, наверное, сложное здесь — это то, что рекрутер рад увидеть ваш ноушн. А кто-то из дизайна — зацепится за ваш визуальный сайт. И получается, что, когда делаешь портфолио, нужно усидеть на двух стульях)) а то сделаете какую-то ноу хау главную своего сайта, а рекрутер скажет «ну и говно яркое» и всё… Но, если один такой кандидат будет, то оцен…
😁35🤯14🤣9custom 60214100128683819424❤3😭3👾1
Лучший мем от победителя 😁
😁31💯11🤣9❤3🤩2🤪2💘1
BMW тут выпустили редизайн тоже)) обновили Х5 беху И я не очень понимаю, что происходит с дизайнерами промышленными. Почему феррари, бмв, Ауди и другие машины новые — выглядят так странно Это ведь согласовывает много людей, значит были проведены какие-то исследования, в сторону чего движется основной потребитель. Из чего-то же они пришли к выводу, что надо делать такую упоротую машину Жду мемы от вас в комментария…
❤18🙈9😁7💯2💘1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @howship. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 390,455 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анастаска Как корабль” (@howship), 2,448 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/howship.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.