Channel
@fedoros
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
724subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001362764231 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fedoros |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fedoros |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 724 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 724 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (5 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,163 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
83 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 20 | 24.1% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 18.1% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 13.3% | |
| 😭 | 11 | 13.3% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 10.8% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 8.43% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 7.23% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 2.41% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 2.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В середине августа буду выступать в канале сладенькие вакансии в дизайне, на 1 день. Если есть предложения для обзора — можете смело скидывать в комменты. Прост у меня не особо много опыта в анализе вак, буду импровизировать скорее всего 🧠 @fedoros
❤4
🚲 Го на второй ночной Мосвелофест. Он пройдёт 1 августа по ночному Садовому кольцу — это редкость происходящая раз в год: https://mosvelofest.mos.ru/events/01aug2026/about/ Как обычно — желательно приобрести велофары и прочий экип чтоб не попасть в дтп UPD: отменили, чекайте новости @fedoros
👍3💋2
Наконец-то получилось открыть LinkedIn аккаунт Да, звучит отстало, но ранее каждый раз попытка открытия этой эйчаровой, парашной работоублюдии оборачивалась бесконечной проверкой безопасности через капчу/пинкод. И так длилось несколько лет. Со всех устройств. В том числе с платными впнами. И даже когда находился заграницей в отпуске, линкед оставался недавалкой🙂 Узнал и открыл случайно, сидя с серверов USA. Пока чт…
💋2
Еще по приколу пробовал зарегаться на продакт фест. Отказали Это не вакансия, но даже тут яндекс держит свою репутацию на уровне 😁 Я так понимаю, те кто прошли модерацию были отобраны на первый этап отбора на фест из 23 возможных. К слову, я слышал что на 23 этапе надо будет сделать сальтуху на камеру во время созвона. Если не сделаешь — оффера на продуктовый фест не будет 🙂🙂🙂 UPD: Ого. Мне написали те кто смогли …
😭11
В итоге закорешился там с ВТБшными дизайнерами и двое из них, Егор и Пётр позвали на https://summer.aidafest.ru/ Пока не знаю, идти/не идти, может быть промик со скидоном от кого-нибудь переубедит меня 👉👈🙂. Те кто ходил в прошлые разы, напишите фидбек в комменты пж. А с кайференции свалил в 9 вечера тк вспомнил что мне уже не двадцатник лет чтоб тусить допоздна 👨🦳
💋3🤝2
😮
🙏6👍2
На кайференции 😱
🔥5💋4👍2
Ну допустим, кто-то начал добавляться. У меня была идея своего публичного чата ещё лет 5-7 назад, но быстро позабылась даже не помню почему 😁 Вот, по приколу создал Комьюнити Элитных Дизайнеров. Величайших. С топиками по продуктовому дизайну, UI, дизайн-системам, 3D моделированию и тд (дополняется). Добавил в эту новую штуку от тг. Кто не зайдет тот не зайдёт, потому что оно тестовое, временное. Может тоже не зайдёт…
💋3👍1
Тестирую новую фичу телеги – создание сообществ. Пока что хз в чём суть, даже прочитав об этом обновлении в блоге телеги. Может быть потом удалю по ненадобности P.S. сделал публичным, можно типа добавлять ваши сообщества если есть. Хотя логичнее было бы добавлять каналы 🤷 P.S 2: чёт идея говно, это идеально сработало бы для админа канала slashdesigner и его двух охуенно огромных чатов по фигме и дизайну. Либо для а…
❤2
Posted without readable text
На самом деле я всё таки иду на Кайференцию. На размышление как я раздобыл билет, потратив весь бюджет на гирю даётся 0 секунд, время пошло 🙂 Кто ещё пойдёт? Го знакомиться и нет_воркать? (= не работать 😱)
❤2👍2👎2
В итоге гиря 16кг победила дизайнерский нетворкинг. Теперь у меня есть классный, чугунный, домашний питомец. Жаль говорить не умеет. Буду периодически его выгуливать, поднимать на ручки и носить 🥹🥹🥹 А так треню с гирей уже одну неделю, с учётом интервального голодания — слегка сбросил, плечи запумпились 🥵
💋4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @fedoros. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 876,353 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Serge Cun't Design” (@fedoros), 724 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fedoros.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.