Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥7

Channel
@startov7
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
19,332subscribers
-114 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001795435737 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @startov7 |
| Description | Методики тренировок, упражнения, вдохновение, мотивация, красота и улыбки. ❄️ @ski_7startov 🏃♂️ @run_7startov 🚴♀️ @velo_7startov 🏊 @swim_7startov сайт: 7startov.com РКН: vk.cc/cIKe8l #IUYBU Идеи постов: @samusandr Сотрудничество: @denis_r_shiryaev |
| Created | 7 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/startov7 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 19,332 | -19 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 19,351 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 19,365 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 19,375 | -26 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 19,401 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 19,412 | -17 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 19,429 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:41 | 19,436 | -10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 19,446 | first reading |
57 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 57 (2 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 57,444 |
| Reactions total | 852 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
852 reactions across 57 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 408 | 47.9% | |
| ❤ | 221 | 25.9% | |
| 👍 | 139 | 16.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 2.46% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 1.53% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 1.41% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 1.17% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 1.17% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 0.704% | |
| 🏆 | 4 | 0.469% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.352% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 0.235% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.117% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.117% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 852reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwmSzeP | 1 | 13 August 2026 | 13 August 2026 |
| 2Vtzqx2RvQB | 1 | 10 August 2026 | 10 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥7
#болеемзанаших Снова вайб воды с Парижа. 🥇 Евгения Чикунова — 200 м брасс, 2:19.32 🥇 Егор Корнев, Иван Гирев, Дарья Клепикова, Кира Манохина — 4х100 вольный стиль (смеш.), 3:19.95 🥈 Климент Колесников — 50 м на спине, 24.12 🥉 Павел Самусенко — 50 м на спине, 24.14 🥉 Дарья Клепикова — 100 м баттерфляй, 56.76 5 место: Ксения Мишарина — 1500 м вольный стиль, 16:09.12 Потрясающий день по накалу борьбы. Особенно микс…
❤3👍1
#болеемзанаших BOOOOOM❗️❗️ Евгения Чикунова на голову выше всех в финале 200м брасом. Рекорд ЧЕ Поздравляем нашу спортсменку. 💪💪💪
🔥27❤4
🤣
😁10
#болеемзанаших Вайб вчерашнего дня плавания в Париже. 🥈 Иван Гирев, Василий Кукушкин, Александр Щеголев, Егор Корнев — 4х100 м вольный стиль, 3:10.12 4 место: Кирилл Пригода — 200 м брасс, 2:09.14 5 место: Алина Гайфутдинова — 50 м на спине, 27.23 8 место: Андрей Минаков — 100 м баттерфляй, 51.89 Источник: ФВВСР
❤10
#болеемзанаших Пятничная программа 🙏🙏🙏
❤3👍1
Всем привет. Пока наши ребята на воде показывают мощнейшие результаты, вернемся в мир бега. А именно, трейлраннинга. Или сксйраннинга. Уже через 2 недели состоится финал серии UTMB Олимпийские игры в трейле, если упрощать понимание важности мероприятия. Немного информации: UTMB Mont-Blanc 2026 — это очередная (и очень ожидаемая) версия одного из самых престижных ультратрейлов в мире. По сути, это целая недел…
👍4
Драма в финале женских барьеров на ЧЕ В финале чемпионата Европы по женским барьерам на 100 метров Надин Виссер из Нидерландов и Пия Скжижовска из Польши показали одинаковое время 12.67 Результаты спортсменок были разделены тысячными 0.001 сек. Вот это ювелирно💪 Источники: mediumrareathletics
❤🔥6👍2🥰1
22-23 августа в Яхроме пройдет грандиозный велофестиваль от «Пятёрочки». Будет 5 дистанций от 1,8 до 111 км. Это отличная возможность попробовать что-то новое и проверить на что вы способны! Любителям будет интересно, но и бывалым скучно не будет! Помимо гонок будет множество интересных активностей с призами и классной атмосферой! Отличная возможность провести время с семьей и друзьями! Также в программе - концерт…
❤6👍2
А вот и причина эмоций😇😇😇
🔥15❤9❤🔥3👎1
#болеемзанаших Программа в Париже на сегодня. Источник: фввср Ждем эмоции, ждем медали
🔥1
Всем привет. Ничего более честного, милого, эмоционального Вы сегодня не увидите больше. Какие же молодцы наши пловцы. Приятно смотреть за новым поколением. 😎😎
🔥31❤10🥰10
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @startov7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Оооххз, вот и динамичные выходные были. Где участвовали, отмечайтесь
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Всем привет. На этой неделе в Москве целый фестиваль спорта. Участвуете?
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 354,342 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“7 Стартов - канал для влюбленных в спорт” (@startov7), 19,332 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/startov7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.