Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for zanindima

Channel

zanindima

@zanindima

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,849subscribers

+2,980 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001625245579
TypeChannel
Username@zanindima
Created11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zanindima

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

16,86620,26718,566.56 August 2026 — 16,869 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,869 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,866 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,889 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,928 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,964 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,014 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,047 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,490 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,135 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,363 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,426 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,463 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,053 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,238 subscribers22 August 2026 — 20,255 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,267 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,245 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,238 subscribers27 August 2026 — 20,205 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,201 subscribers29 August 2026 — 20,175 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,148 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,132 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,052 subscribers2 September 2026 — 20,043 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,029 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,994 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,986 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,973 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,955 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,930 subscribers16 September 2026 — 19,900 subscribers19 September 2026 — 19,885 subscribers26 September 2026 — 19,849 subscribers19,8496 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net +2,980. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,356–20,777 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 05:3819,849-36
19 Sept 2026, 08:0019,885-15
16 Sept 2026, 23:4119,900-30
15 Sept 2026, 01:4119,930-25
13 Sept 2026, 11:3619,955-18
11 Sept 2026, 14:3719,973-13
9 Sept 2026, 00:3519,986-8
5 Sept 2026, 15:5919,994-35
3 Sept 2026, 17:2120,029-14
2 Sept 2026, 06:4420,043-9
1 Sept 2026, 05:1220,052-80
31 Aug 2026, 06:1320,132-16
30 Aug 2026, 04:2820,148-27
29 Aug 2026, 02:1220,175-26
28 Aug 2026, 02:1520,201-4
27 Aug 2026, 04:2520,205-33
26 Aug 2026, 03:5420,238-7
25 Aug 2026, 04:2120,245-22
24 Aug 2026, 02:1820,267+12
22 Aug 2026, 06:4720,255first reading

Engagement

299 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.6%
avg views ÷ 19,849 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,480
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 299 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held299 (26 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total116,610
Reactions total6,715
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 39m
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 93 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

104,429 reactions across 291 posts, in 59 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤46,23944.3%
🔥16,22615.5%
😭4,9434.73%
😁4,3944.21%
💔4,0463.87%
🤣3,1973.06%
🙏3,0272.90%
👍2,8522.73%
❤‍🔥2,6092.50%
💯2,4012.30%
🏆2,2822.19%
😱2,2682.17%
😢2,0641.98%
🥰1,2351.18%
👏1,2331.18%
🤬6070.581%
🍾5590.535%
🎉5490.526%
🥴5130.491%
👀4790.459%
39 further kinds2,7062.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 295 of the 299 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105,480 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 299 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 07:27 UTC≈3,900 views377 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Много ли у нас дома растений? Много Хочу ли я еще больше? Конечно😍

🔥246❤90❤‍🔥23😁12🥰5🤔1

1 Sept 2026, 15:27 UTC≈5,120 views151 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Локомотив снова проиграл 9 матчей без побед 🫥

💔89😢48❤9🔥2😁2🤣1

1 Sept 2026, 12:23 UTC≈6,930 views271 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Сегодня с утра приехал в Московский государственный университет спорта и туризма. Это один из лучших спортивных вузов страны. В нем учились/учатся Карим и Настя Халили, Савелий Коростелев, Дарья Непряева, Камила Валиева, Сергей Пиняев, Никита Крюков, Арсений Грицюк - в общем, много славных ребят. Там учат на тренеров, спортивных журналистов/психологов/дипломатов, погружают в туристическую индустрию и гостиничное де…

❤156🔥82👍17🆒5❤‍🔥4🥴4👎1😐1

1 Sept 2026, 05:58 UTC≈6,190 views529 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Вчера слепил видос про выступление Нагорного на ГПЛ. В инсте меньше чем за сутки улетел за 1,5млн просмотров 🫣

🔥404❤101👍20👏4

1 Sept 2026, 05:56 UTC≈5,580 views97 reactionsread 3 September 2026

105 человек поучаствовали 🥹 Вы потрясающие ❤️

❤97

30 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈6,670 views809 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Ну и очень мило было, когда Марк убежал от Даши выскочил к Никите))

❤450🥰229🔥86💯24🤩10❤‍🔥5💔2😎2

30 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈6,580 views883 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Что за мощщщщщщь В любой ситуации выходит и делает. Даже спустя столько лет Грандиозный спортсмен Сам Немов в шоке 😅

🥰387💯218❤107🔥84👏47🏆23👍7💔4

30 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTC≈6,390 views457 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Это было сильно))

❤276🔥130🍾27😁15🏆5😍4

30 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈6,160 views419 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Последний раз на помост выходил 3 года назад. И вот сейчас - без разминки, просто с кресла встать и идти на вольные. Волнуется, говорит, дико

❤315🏆62🤯17👍12🤣6❤‍🔥4🔥3

30 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC≈6,080 views487 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Это ж мои любимые гимнасты 🥳

❤358👏85🍾30❤‍🔥5🥰5⚡2🏆2

30 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC≈6,060 views334 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Пока на трибуне 🤨

❤223😁77🤔19❤‍🔥8👍6🤯1

30 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈6,260 views284 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Завтра эфир спецрепа, но я сорвался с работы - на 2 часа метнуться в академию Динамо посмотреть на старт ГПЛ, где должен выйти на снаряды Никита Нагорный. Это сейчас редкость) Зал полный, куча детей, много классных гимнастов, темные стены, кайфовый свет - прям нравится ❤️

❤207👍51🥰17🔥8👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 299 posts we hold for @zanindima. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Союз биатлонистов России
@russianbiathlon · 21,592
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 September 2026
Реальный Губер 🤘🏻
@RealGuberniev · 80,090
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Матч! Биатлон и лыжи
@biathlon_match · 58,580
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
Никита Нагорный
@nikitanagornyy · 37,299
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
real_artur
@real_dalaloyan96 · 67,424
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Роман Костомаров
@kostomarovroman · 34,478
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“zanindima” (@zanindima), 19,849 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zanindima.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.