Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Windows 11, 10, etc - Вадим Стеркин

@sterkin_ru

Has discussion group

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

15,508subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001018775701
TypeChannel
Username@sterkin_ru
DescriptionАвторский канал. Windows, безопасность, мобильный мир: • тайное знание • мощный ликбез • гадание по логам • срыв покровов • доставка пруфов Чат: @winsiders Блог: outsidethebox.ms ЛС: @vsterkin Донаты ₽: boosty.to/sterkin РКН: https://clck.ru/3LBugC
Created23 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sterkin_ru

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Windows 10, etc - Вадим Стеркин — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

15,50715,52215,514.55 August 2026 — 15,522 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,520 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,518 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,513 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,507 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,513 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,508 subscribers15,5085 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 7 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,505–15,524 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:1315,508-5
11 Aug 2026, 21:2715,513+6
11 Aug 2026, 00:3515,507-6
8 Aug 2026, 21:0715,513-5
7 Aug 2026, 23:0215,518-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:5215,520-2
5 Aug 2026, 18:1815,522first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.9%
avg views ÷ 15,508 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,030
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held21 (1 June 202614 August 2026)
Views total48,260
Reactions total605
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
291
Videos
6
Links
1,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,533 reactions across 21 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍76149.6%
🔥16811.0%
😁1378.94%
1328.61%
🫡1026.65%
🤔956.20%
👏422.74%
🤣332.15%
👌251.63%
🤷‍♂110.718%
👀90.587%
🙈70.457%
💯40.261%
🏆30.196%
🤯20.13%
🤝10.065%
🦄10.065%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,533reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sterkin_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 June 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈2,440 views61 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​⌛️ BootVis - ускоритель загрузки Windows XP Отправляемся на 25 лет назад и вспоминаем утилиту для оптимизации загрузки Windows XP! BootVis предназначалась для ОЕМ-изготовителей. Но поскольку утилиту можно было свободно скачать с сайта Microsoft, она стала популярна у энтузиастов. А заодно приобрела некий налёт тайного знания по ускорению загрузки Windows ХР. Утилита решала две задачи: измерение и оптимизацию. 🕒

👍43🫡144

10 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC≈4,740 views106 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​🔓 О посещении сайтов российских организаций после отзыва TLS-сертификатов В конце июля произошёл массовый отзыв TLS-сертификатов у сайтов российских банков и прочих компаний. В связи с этим встал вопрос, как их открывать в браузерах и веб-приложениях. Попавшие под раздачу организации рекомендуют использовать Яндекс Браузер (ЯБ) или устанавливать сертификат национального удостоверяющего центра (НУЦ) Минцифры. 👉 Вс

👍6920😁7🤣5🤔3🙈2

6 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC≈5,770 views79 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤔61👍132😁2🦄1

3 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC≈6,820 views87 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​⚙️ spacedesk - превратите другое устройство в дополнительный дисплей и даже пульт управления Windows Сегодня в рубриках "Утилиты" и "Вы нам писали" - Piter Pen. У меня есть AIO 23" древний, но с хорошим экраном и вин11, который я использую просто в качестве второго монитора. И для этого мне раньше приходилось каждый раз после включения подключать через Win+P. А сегодня открыл для себя замечательную софтинку spac

👍59🔥125💯4🤔3👏2🫡2

30 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈7,290 views100 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🎤 О голосовом вводе на смартфонах: Gboard vs. Говорун На смартфоне у меня давно приоритетный метод ввода - голосовой. Затем свайп и печать одной рукой: эти два метода примерно сопоставимы по скорости. Свайп приятнее и побыстрее, но нередко ошибается на длинных словах. Печать же ускоряется за счет подсказок, хотя в русском языке это не очень эффективно из-за разнообразия окончаний. Так или иначе, у меня голосовой вв

👍65🤔14🔥103🏆3🫡3👌1🤷‍♂1

27 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈6,190 views86 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🔍 Символизм лупы не универсален Сегодня у меня для вас замечательная история из блога Рэймонда Чена в моём свободном переводе. В Windows 3.0 появилась программа WinHelp для просмотра файлов встроенной справки. На панели инструментов располагался ряд кнопок: Index (Указатель), Back (Назад), Browse backward (Просмотр назад), Browse forward (Просмотр вперёд) и Search (Поиск). Значком Index служила карточка с разделит

👏34👍1812😁12🔥4🤔4👌2

23 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈7,350 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍184🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈7,660 views62 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🔄 USMT - консольное средство переноса данных Намедни мне на одном из проектов пришлось менять доменный аккаунт. Как следствие, на ПК создавался новый локальный профиль. Я попросил ИТ-отдел мигрировать старый профиль и в качестве инструмента предложил User State Migration Tool, USMT. Я много лет советовал эту утилиту в подобных ситуациях, хотя не помню, когда последний раз сам ей пользовался. Может быть и никогда, п

👍4313🤔5👌1

16 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈8,390 views72 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚙️ Better Open With: управление дефолтным браузером в Android Я давно пользуюсь этим годным приложением. Но исторически применял его для контроля переходов в клиенты Twitter и YouTube. А в последнее время стал более актуальным ещё один сценарий, который окончательно сформулировал для меня товарищ Niks. 🌐 Два браузера. Один ходит через прокси, другой - напрямую. Зачастую знаешь, какой браузер запустить для того или

👍52🔥124👌1👏1🤝1🫡1

13 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈7,280 views90 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​🧹 Простой пример корректного удаления программы в нестандартной ситуации При попытке удалить приложение Copilot меня ждал сюрприз в Параметры - Приложения. В списке программа есть, а при удалении - нет. Windows cannot find 'C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft\Copilot\Application\149.0.4022.94\Installer\copilot_setup.exe'. Make sure you typed the name correctly, and then try again. Я зашел в Program Files и увидел, ч

👍45🔥26😁13🤷‍♂42

9 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈7,620 views143 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​💬 Комментарии блога - всё В начале 2010-х, когда я серьёзно занимался развитием блога, в нём было множество комментариев. В моей политике блога был специальный пункт: Каждому комментарию уделяется внимание. Я читаю абсолютно все комментарии читателей и отвечаю на подавляющее большинство из них. И это заявление не было формальностью! Ответы постоянным читателям и мимокрокодилам зачастую занимали у меня больше врем

🫡82👍339🤣6👌5🤷‍♂5🤯2👏1

6 Jul 2026, 06:15 UTC≈7,630 views65 reactionsread 15 August 2026

​⬇️ Как из консоли скачать последнюю версию программы с GitHub и не только Не раз видел этот вопрос в чатах, причём нередко решение удивляло сложностью и костылями. У меня же эта задача чаще возникает в сценарии: дать вечнозелёную ссылку на последний релиз GitHub. Давайте рассмотрим несколько решений. ⚙️ Загрузка с помощью winget Если программа есть в репозитории winget, задача значительно упрощается. Строго говоря

👍4511🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @sterkin_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@sterkin_ru edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
11 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jun 2026, 06:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz982 voters

Викторина: с помощью какой команды в актуальной версии PowerShell Core НЕЛЬЗЯ вывести содержимое текстового файла из текущей папки?

  1. Get-Content 1.txt3%
  2. gc 1.txt4%
  3. cat 1.txt9%
  4. Select-String '[\s\S]' 1.txt -r9%
  5. Нельзя вариантами 3 и 417%
  6. Никакой нельзя8%
  7. Любой можно51%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 119,719 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Windows 11, 10, etc - Вадим Стеркин” (@sterkin_ru), 15,508 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sterkin_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.