National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
40 measurements spanning 90 days, net -39,217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 03:10
33
+11
27 Oct 2026, 20:40
22
+11
20 Oct 2026, 16:18
11
+9
14 Oct 2026, 07:41
2
-38,631
9 Oct 2026, 03:38
38,633
-50
4 Oct 2026, 18:16
38,683
-126
26 Sept 2026, 20:15
38,809
-124
19 Sept 2026, 16:56
38,933
-1
17 Sept 2026, 02:01
38,934
-20
15 Sept 2026, 00:59
38,954
-20
13 Sept 2026, 13:17
38,974
-50
11 Sept 2026, 16:36
39,024
-37
8 Sept 2026, 23:40
39,061
-73
5 Sept 2026, 18:36
39,134
-11
3 Sept 2026, 14:19
39,145
-29
2 Sept 2026, 05:24
39,174
-19
31 Aug 2026, 04:16
39,193
-3
30 Aug 2026, 03:55
39,196
-1
29 Aug 2026, 02:37
39,197
+1
28 Aug 2026, 01:49
39,196
first reading
Engagement
1,618 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10698.8%
avg views ÷ 33 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,530
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.566%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 1,618 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 October 2026
Posts held
1,618 (6 August 2026 – 10 October 2026)
Views total
70,612
Reactions total
393
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Oct 2026, 15:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4h 53m
Average length
1m 32s
Measured directly from 191 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
34,106 reactions across 987 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🙏
8,653
25.4%
🤬
7,110
20.8%
❤
5,302
15.5%
😢
5,141
15.1%
😁
1,977
5.80%
👍
1,365
4.00%
😱
996
2.92%
😨
816
2.39%
🤔
503
1.47%
🔥
405
1.19%
👏
297
0.871%
🤷♂
282
0.827%
😐
261
0.765%
💔
231
0.677%
🤯
227
0.666%
👀
189
0.554%
💯
182
0.534%
❤🔥
42
0.123%
🥰
29
0.085%
🤝
25
0.073%
5 further kinds
73
0.214%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 989 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 10 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 999 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @slav_kramatorskDonbass. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 10 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴Українські військові знищили колону російського легкого автотранспорту в тимчасово окупованому Сватовому на Луганщині
▪️Техніка доставляла армії РФ боєприпаси, провізію та особовий склад. Відео ураження опублікували на сторінці 77 окремої аеромобільної бригади ДШВ❗
Подписаться ✔️
Предложить контент 📝
❗ПАССАЖИРСКИЕ ПЕРЕВОЗКИ
♦️♦️🔺♦️ 🔺♦️🔺♦️
Быстрая связь с нами
@avto_bus_Yuli
Мы работаем в сфере пассажирские перевозки
10лет,наша репутация очень высока
🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎
🍎🍎🍎🍎🍎
Наши отзывы
https://t.me/avto_bus_Yuliya
✈️✈️✈️😞😞😞😞😞
Мы выполняем ежедневно рейсы
Из Украины и Европейских стран ,подготавливаем наших пассажиров к прохождению фильтрации в Шереметьево,выкупаем авиа билеты заранее👑✈️✈️✈️
📌📌📌Селим на отдых перед ав…
‼️ ГРУЗОВЫЕ И ГРУЗОПАССАЖИРСКИЕ ПЕРЕВОЗКИ ‼️
☎️ 0666866277
☎️ 0981149460
🏠 Из Донецкой, Харьковской, Днепропетровской, Запорожской, Сумской и других областей Украины🇺🇦
🌍 В любой город Украины.
🚛 Вывезем: Ваш бизнес, товар, вещи, оборудование, поможем с переездом (холодильники, стиралки, телевизоры, крупногабаритная мебель и т.д.)
🚛 И в обратном направлении
📦 От 100 кг до 5 тонн. Подберём авто под ваш бюджет и …
🤯 Окупанти шукають працівників до «адміністрації» Лимана, який не контролюють
▪️На одному з підконтрольних окупантам сайтів опублікували чотири вакансії у фейковій «адміністрації» Лимана — від фахівця з мобілізаційної роботи до спеціаліста з протидії корупції
▪️При цьому місто залишається під контролем України, а на напрямку тривають контрнаступальні дії ЗСУ❗
Подписаться ✔️
Предложить контент 📝
‼️ПАССАЖИРСКИЕ ПЕРЕВОЗКИ‼️
✅✅✅✅✅Прямые машины! Без пеших переходов! Официальный проезд!
✈️ НАШ ТЕЛЕГРАМ КАНАЛ
@YourLuckyTicket
✈️ АККАУНТ ДЛЯ СВЯЗИ
@Perevozki_TicketRU
🤩🎟 Организуем надёжный маршрут для вас и ваших близких
с авиаперелетом и наземным трансфером.
🇺🇦 🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸
Забираем: Киев, Харьков, Днепр, Запорожье, Львов, Винница, Черкассы, Ровно, Одесса, Житомир, Ивано-Франковск, Полтава, Краматорск, Славянск и…
🔴«Путин в ходе разговора с Трампом с пониманием воспринял некоторые предложения американской стороны, направленные на деэскалацию в Украине», - заявил Песков, не уточнив о каких именно предложениях идет речь
▪️По его словам, Путин и Трамп во время вчерашнего звонка по большей части обсуждали вопрос урегулирования войны в Украине❗
Подписаться ✔️
Предложить контент 📝
🔸Славянск, враг планирует нанести удар по данному району
Дата и время неизвестно
Подписаться на будни
Краматорского района ✅
🤬23🙏13❤4👏2😐1😢1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,618 posts we hold for @slav_kramatorskDonbass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 28 August 2026 to 10 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Hello Славянск 🇺🇦 @slavyansk_hello · 27,817 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
Славянск / Краматорск @slav_kram · 131,950 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Краматорский пишет @kramatorskiy_pishet · 43,854 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
Я ❤️ Краматорск @news_kramatorsk · 92,300 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
Краматорськ 24 @kramatorsk24_news · 30,183 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
donbas_pokrovsk_selidovo @donbas_pokrovsk_selidovo · 85 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
Типовий Краматорськ @kramatorsk_news · 140,152 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
Типичная Константиновка @konstachaa · 42,389 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
donbass_divisions @donbass_divisions · 7 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 September 2026
Донбас Оперативний @Operatyvnyi_Donbas · 82,169 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
Мы с Донбасса ⚒️ @donbas_online · 20,887 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 September 2026
Типичное Доброполье l Новости Донбасса @dobropillya_td · 46,081 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Pokrovsk.news @pokrovsk_news · 21,677 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Славянск Краматорск | Донбасс” (@slav_kramatorskDonbass), 33 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slav_kramatorskDonbass.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.