Telegram — 13 лет! Самое время вспомнить, как он стал №1 в Узбекистане. @skartariss #ретро
🤯8❤3😢1

Channel
@skartariss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,845subscribers
+29 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001688399922 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @skartariss |
| Description | O’zbek tilida: @beshtorr №1 по исследованиям и аналитике в Узбекистане. Est 2022. Для сотрудничества: @zarinarada Для всего остального: linkedin.com/in/elmuradov Проголосовать за канал: t.me/boost/skartariss |
| Created | 1 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/skartariss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 17,845 | +6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 17,839 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 17,842 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 17,847 | +18 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 17,829 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 17,828 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 17,826 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 17,818 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 17,816 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (16 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 337,470 |
| Reactions total | 8,285 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
8,285 reactions across 29 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 2,587 | 31.2% | |
| 👍 | 1,718 | 20.7% | |
| 😁 | 1,395 | 16.8% | |
| ❤ | 1,163 | 14.0% | |
| 🔥 | 604 | 7.29% | |
| 😢 | 231 | 2.79% | |
| 🦄 | 204 | 2.46% | |
| 💯 | 139 | 1.68% | |
| 👏 | 129 | 1.56% | |
| 🤔 | 52 | 0.628% | |
| 🤬 | 40 | 0.483% | |
| 🤯 | 15 | 0.181% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 0.097% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,657reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skartariss. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 31 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram — 13 лет! Самое время вспомнить, как он стал №1 в Узбекистане. @skartariss #ретро
🤯8❤3😢1
UzOman купил долю в еще одной гостинице Давно не было интересных сделок, пора это исправить. UzOman, один из крупнейших инвесторов в стране, добавил в своё портфолио Wyndham Garden Tashkent. Это отель 4*, который появился в 2019 году и первые годы работал как Regal Stay. В 2024 году он получил нынешнее название. По нашим данным, сделка прошла в мае — 49% компании за 76,8 млрд сумов. Если отель таким образом оцен…
❤45👍22👎7👏4🦄2
Поздравляю Темура Саъди с награждением медалью «Шуҳрат»! Ma’no Branding действительно делает крутые вещи, чего стоит только айдентика для TBC. Та самая, вдохновлённая чапаном. Кроме того: ⏺ основатель Centrum Air Абдулазиз Абдурахманов награждён орденом «Дўстлик». ⏺ основатель Inter Nation Бекзод Максудов награждён медалью «Келажак бунёдкори». ⏺ руководитель Yandex Uzbekistan Иззат Шукуров, основатель Uzum Джасу…
👏92🔥33❤25👍14👎9😢2💯1
Главная фича нового Payme Успели уже заценить новый дизайн Payme, да? Видел много отзывов: кому-то нравится, кому-то нет, всё как обычно. Но там есть одно решение, которое сделано с прицелом на то, куда движется весь рынок платежей Узбекистана. У нас сейчас два сценария оплаты через QR-код: или ты сканируешь, или показываешь свой, и его сканирует продавец. Почти во всех приложениях между этими режимами надо пере…
🦄70❤40👍32👎30🔥10🤔4💯3🤬2
💲Куда идти за инвестициями в Узбекистане Долгое время инвестиции в Узбекистане надо было искать у трёх F: friends, family, fools. Всё изменилось, когда в 2020 году сюда пришёл Sturgeon Capital. Спустя шесть лет здесь уже больше 10 институциональных инвесторов. При этом рынок ещё молодой, всё только начинается, в том числе для самих фондов. Разделения по сферам нет, все инвестируют во всё. Однако постепенно появл…
❤40👍22🦄8👎5😁3🔥2
Что на самом деле означает приход Etihad в Узбекистан На днях Etihad Airways начала летать в Узбекистан. Сам запуск не новость — мы с вами знали о нём ещё год назад. Кроме того, прямые рейсы в Абу-Даби были и раньше — вон лоукостер Air Arabia Abu Dhabi выполняет их уже несколько лет. Однако приход Etihad всё равно значим, потому что теперь можно каждый день летать по всей её сетке из 100+ направлений. Например, у…
❤85👍46🔥13👎3🦄3
🏦 Ipoteka Bank сменил руководителя, но не курс В конце июля Адам Сентпетери официально стал руководителем Ipoteka Bank OTP Group. Для банка человек не чужой — пришёл ещё летом 2023 года, сразу после приватизации. Сначала отвечал за стратегию и финансы, затем возглавил всю программу трансформации. Так что руководитель новый, но курс прежний — превращать бывший государственный банк в современный европейский. Резул…
👍78❤19👎7🔥7🤬3🦄3
Перестройка: о чём говорят свежие показатели TBC TBC Uzbekistan опубликовала результаты первой половины года. И там есть интересные изменения. ⏺ Оборот платежей вырос на 54% и достиг $3,2 млрд. Вклады увеличились на 8% — до $548 млн, кредиты составили $872 млн. Количество карт Salom выросло на 129% и превысило 1,2 млн. Кредитных карт Osmon стало в три раза больше — уже 212 тысяч. Всего сервисами TBC Uzbekistan к…
👍75❤48👎17🔥8🦄4🤬3
Кто бы мог подумать, что узбекистанцы будут осваивать английский благодаря курьерам из Пакистана и Бангладеш ) @skartariss #ситуация
😁478💯30🤔12👎11👍10❤9🔥5🦄1
Кризис Wildberries уже сказывается на Узбекистане и меняет торговые пути в регионе Вы уже наверняка знаете, что в России горят склады Wildberries. Сейчас повреждено или уничтожено больше 20% площадей. Нас это тоже касается, потому что в последние годы маркетплейс стал одним из каналов экспорта, в основном текстиля. В прошлом году через площадку продали узбекистанских товаров на $1,5 млрд, в этом году ожидалось $2 …
❤83👍52🦄9😢7🤯6😱2🤔1😁1
💲Вот 10 крупнейших платёжных компаний Узбекистана За первую половину года они заработали 2,4 трлн сумов — это 93% всего рынка. Да, формально у нас 51 компания с лицензией платёжной организации, но одни ещё не работают, другие уже не работают, третьи только делают вид, что работают. В итоге реальных игроков где-то 25, причём половина из них ещё не вышла из минуса. Зато у тех, кто уже создал продукт и нашёл свою ау…
👍69❤18🔥10🦄1
👍 Uklon начинает экспансию в Узбекистане Первым регионом за пределами Ташкента станет Ферганская долина. Сейчас идёт подключение водителей, уже скоро можно будет заказывать поездки и доставку. Да, сервис три года работал только в столице, а тут расширение сразу на пять городов: Фергана, Маргилан, Коканд, Наманган и Андижан. Однако речь, по сути, идёт об одном регионе, самом густонаселённом. Высокая плотность, вы…
👍98❤28🔥14😁13👎12🦄8
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @skartariss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@skartariss edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 12,779 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пик Скартариса” (@skartariss), 17,845 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skartariss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.