Channel
@otabekhaq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
214subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002711426509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @otabekhaq |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/otabekhaq |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 214 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 216 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 216 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
117 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 56 | 47.9% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 17.1% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 12.0% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 5.98% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.71% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.855% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.855% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇿 Cross-sell haqida ikki og‘iz… Kecha Otabek aka LinkedIn’da qiziqarli post joyladilar. Ko‘tarilgan mavzu men uchun ham juda dolzarb. Afsuski, ayrim banklarimiz cross-sell masalasida biroz me’yorni unutib qo‘yishadi. Mahsulot logikasi boshidanoq “qancha ko‘p taklif qilsak, shuncha yaxshi” tamoyili asosida quriladi va keyinchalik deyarli o‘zgarmaydi. Sababi oddiy — natija va daromad bor. Lekin foydalanuvchi nuqtai…
❤1
Япония банклари сунъий интеллект туфайли банкоматлар ва интернет-банкинг вақтинча тўхтатилиши мумкинлигидан огоҳлантирди Япония банклари ассоциацияси илғор сунъий интеллект технологиялари банк тизими учун киберхавфларни янги босқичга олиб чиқиши мумкинлигини маълум қилди. Ассоциация раиси ва Mizuho Bank раҳбари Кацухико Катонинг айтишича, замонавий AI тизимлари банк ахборот тизимларидаги заифликларни жуда қисқа вақ…
❤1👍1
🔐 Yana bir muhim kuzatuv So‘nggi paytlarda banklar ichki ma’lumotlar chiqib ketishidan qo‘rqib, tashqi kompaniyalarni jalb qilishni kamaytirayotgani sezilmoqda. Qiziq tomoni: 👉 ichki resurs bilan bajariladigan loyihalar ko‘pincha rejadagidan ko‘proq byudjet talab qiladi. Paradoks 🙂 Boshqa tomondan esa: 👉 ichki xodimlar 100% xavfsizlikni ta’minlaydi, deb ham aytib bo‘lmaydi. Masalan, bugungi kunda ko‘plab kiberhuj…
❤3🫡1
📌 “Ro‘yxat” haqida bir necha fikr Ushbu ro‘yxat bir qarashda noodatiy ko‘rinadi. Sababi — unda ham texnologik rivojlangan raqamli banklar, ham an’anaviy, asosan B2B segmentiga xizmat ko‘rsatadigan banklar mavjud. 👉 Raqamli banklarda bu tabiiy hol. Mijozlar soni ko‘p bo‘lsa, murojaatlar soni ham ko‘p bo‘lishi — normal jarayon. 👉 An’anaviy banklar esa bozordan qolib ketmaslik uchun yangi mahsulotlar joriy etyapti. Lek…
👍1
Goooool 🇺🇿 vs 🇨🇴 1 : 1 Yasha Fazullayev! Tarix bu!
🔥6❤4🎉1👍1
Paylov kichik biznes va startaplarga qulay "ko‘prik" 🫥 Ko‘pgina asoschilar banklar bilan ishlashda texnik murakkabliklar yoki uzoq davom etadigan jarayonlarga duch kelishadi. ❓ Buning sababi nimada? Ushbu videoda banklar va to‘lov tashkilotlari (aggregatorlar) o‘rtasidagi farqni hamda nega aynan Paylov kichik biznes va startaplar uchun eng qulay "ko‘prik" ekanligini haqida aytib o'tdik. Instagram | Facebook | Lin…
🔥3❤2🙏1
Murakkab jarayonlar uchun tayyor moliyaviy instrumentlar ➕ Loyiha o‘sgani sayin, uning moliyaviy operatsiyalari ham murakkablashib boradi. Bitta to‘lovni bir nechta hamkorga bo‘lish yoki yuzlab xodimlarga mablag‘larni o‘z vaqtida yetkazib berish — buxgalteriya uchun katta yuklamaga aylanadi. ❗️ Paylov shu kabi operatsion qiyinchiliklarni avtomatlashtirish uchun yechimlarni taklif etamiz: Mablag‘larni avtomatik taqs…
👍6❤2🔥2
Instagramda qiziq bir postga duch keldim. Nega turkiylar fors tilida sõzlashganligi tõg’risida. Qisqa, lõnda va ortiqcha detallarsiz tushuntirilgan. P.S. Nega forsiylar arab alifbosidan foydalanishi alohida hikoya sifatida kutib qolamiz.
👍3❤1🔥1
Caravan Group asoschisi o‘zining asosiy aktivlarini («Osh muzeyi», Cinara’s, Sato) sotuvga qo‘yishga majbur bo‘lmoqda. Sababi inqiroz emas, balki 7 yillik charchatuvchi sudlar, 140 ta majlis va byurokratik absurd. Qisqacha: 1. Kompensatsiyalarning bekor qilinishi: Davlat tomonidan olib qo‘yilgan yerlar uchun qonuniy 12,5 mlrd so‘m tovon puli turli instansiya sudlari tomonidan shunchaki bekor qilinmoqda. 2. O‘tmis…
🔥5😱4❤2
GoInvest ilovasi foydalanuvchisi sifatida bu men uchun ham yangilik bo'ldi 😊 Bilib qo'ygan yaxshi.
Video, posted without a caption
💰 Скоро появится новый венчурный фонд Он выделяется тем, что создаётся двумя крупными инвесторами из Узбекистана и Казахстана — IT Park Ventures и White Hill Capital. Да, в последние годы много говорят об интеграции в Центральной Азии, но IT — это как раз пример того, как она должна быть в жизни. Например, в 2024 году IT Park и Astana Hub запустили платформу Central Asian Innovation Hubs. Позднее к ней присоединил…
❤3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @otabekhaq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,326,875 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Otabek haq *fintex blog” (@otabekhaq), 214 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otabekhaq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.