Channel
@na_begu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,262subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001070167272 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @na_begu |
| Description | Личный канал Малика Каримова. Про изменения в Узбекистане и то, как они влияют на жизнь вокруг. Ищу смысл там, где система встречается с человеком. Все тексты — личное мнение. Сотрудничество: @Eightmediamaker Ўзбек тилида: @yuguryugur |
| Created | 31 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/na_begu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 5,262 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 5,268 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 5,274 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 5,274 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (2 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 25,015 |
| Reactions total | 775 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
775 reactions across 16 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 241 | 31.1% | |
| 👍 | 213 | 27.5% | |
| 🔥 | 96 | 12.4% | |
| 🤣 | 93 | 12.0% | |
| 😢 | 48 | 6.19% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 2.45% | |
| 👎 | 14 | 1.81% | |
| 😱 | 11 | 1.42% | |
| 🥴 | 8 | 1.03% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 0.903% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 0.774% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 0.516% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.387% | |
| 🤬 | 3 | 0.387% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.258% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.129% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.129% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.129% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.129% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.129% | |
| 2 further kinds | 2 | 0.258% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 775reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @na_begu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Если бы у меня был выбор оставить только одно СМИ, которое пишет об Узбекистане, это однозначно была бы «Газета». Я всегда равняюсь на качество контента, редакционную планку и подачу, которые делает команда «Газеты». Для меня это пример того, каким может и должно быть сильное независимое медиа в Узбекистане. Сегодня изданию исполняется 18 лет. Поздравляю основателей, редакцию и всех сотрудников, кто когда-то там раб…
❤38👍18🎉6💯3🤝1
Кажется, мы неправильно измеряем внедрение AI. Оказывается Microsoft недавно выкатил отчет Work Trend Index о том, как AI агенты меняют работу людей и сами компании. К своему стыду наткнулся на него только сейчас. Обычно считают лицензии, активных пользователей и количество запросов. Но всё это про использование инструмента. Не про изменение бизнеса вцелом. Оказывается только 26% опрошенных считают, что их руковод…
🔥5
Полезное обновление от Налогового комитета по электронным чекам. Теперь при сканировании QR-кода чека через камеру смартфона можно открыть его в упрощённом формате: без лишней технической информации, только самое важное — товары, цены и итоговая сумма покупки. При необходимости можно переключиться и на полный формат. На мой взгляд, это важное улучшение, потому что чек становится понятнее для обычного покупателя. Ос…
🔥15❤3👍1
Трагические новости из Нижнекамска. По данным МЧС, в результате атаки беспилотников 10 августа погибли 8 граждан Узбекистана. Ранее сообщалось о 7 погибших узбекистанцах среди 13 жертв. Погибшие работали строителями. Ещё несколько наших соотечественников госпитализированы с травмами разной степени тяжести. По поручению Президента Шавката Мирзиёева создана правительственная комиссия, которая займётся помощью постра…
😢48❤28🕊4🙏3🥰1
Получил огромное эстетическое удовольствие от просмотра «Одиссеи». Всегда сложно снимать фильм по истории, которая за почти 3000 лет давно рассказана, пересказана и не раз экранизирована. Но Нолан смог сделать из классической эпопеи свою версию — масштабную, современную и при этом очень уважительную к первоисточнику. Уверен, что эта экранизация на многие годы станет ориентиром для всех, кто будет обращаться к подоб…
🔥35❤16👍11😈1
Канал боевого командования ВВС Вооруженных сил РУ опубликовал кадры первого полёта нового военно-транспортного самолёта Embraer C-390 Millennium, произведённого для нашей страны. Пару лет назад, когда такой самолёт прилетал к нам, я писал: вот бы и нашим ВВС такой борт. C-390 — один из самых современных реактивных военно-транспортных самолётов своего класса. Он уже выбран рядом стран НАТО и во многих случаях рассма…
👍21❤2
Ташкент – город контрастов! @na_begu
👍20❤4💯2👎1🤬1
Новости от svetanet.uz Добавили возможность отмечать отключение газа и холодной воды. Точно так же - в боте @Sveta_netbot надо выбрать "Нет воды" или "Нет света" и отправить свою локацию. @KurbanoffNet
👍25❤5
Интересно наблюдать за трансформацией Ipoteka bank после прихода OTP Group. Банк опубликовал результаты за первое полугодие 2026 года по МСФО: чистая прибыль выросла на 43% и составила 1,24 трлн сумов. При этом важны не только сами финансовые показатели, но и то, что параллельно растёт качество клиентского опыта. Например, NPS банка достиг 66% и вырос на 24 п.п. за год. Mystery Shopping — 91,8%, Mystery Calling — 9…
👍16🥴8👎4❤3🍌1
А Телеграм бот, в котором можно узнать позорная у тебя махалля или нет, ещё не запустили? Контекст @KurbanoffNet
🤣93🔥11❤3😁2
Котики Корзинки. Встречали их у наших магазинов Mahalla? @na_begu
❤59🔥9👍8👎2❤🔥1🥰1
А вы знали, что улица Заводская в Ташкенте была переименована в улицу Абдуллы Каххара ещё в 1968 году? Прошло почти 60 лет, а для многих ташкентцев она до сих пор Заводская. @na_begu
👍39😱11❤10💯2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @na_begu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 18,263 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“На Бегу” (@na_begu), 5,262 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/na_begu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.