Channel
@wavex_announce
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,770subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002158664394 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wavex_announce |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 7 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wavex_announce |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 1,770 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 1,775 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 1,775 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
649 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 269 | 41.4% | |
| 👍 | 183 | 28.2% | |
| ❤ | 148 | 22.8% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 2.93% | |
| 😱 | 10 | 1.54% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 0.77% | |
| 🫡 | 5 | 0.77% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.616% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.462% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.462% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 649reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2024 to 13 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Treasure Hunt Special Event🎉 As compensation for the recent Telegram channel migration and Treasure Hunt link update issues, we've prepared a special event.💎 Join our new Telegram channel and check out the special event! 🔗New Telegram Channel: t.me/waveX_announcement
👏12👍5
🚨Important Announcement: Telegram Channel Migration and Treasure Hunt Link Update🚨 Dear waveX community, Due to an unknown issue causing our current Telegram channel to malfunction, we are moving to a new channel to ensure smoother communication and a better experience for everyone. 🔗New Telegram Channel: t.me/waveX_announcement Additionally, we've updated the link for Treasure Hunt. You can now access and play t…
👍15🫡5❤4🔥1
Hello from the waveX team, We’re currently experiencing an issue with the Treasure Hunt bot on Telegram. Rest assured, this is not related to the database managing user data. All current users will still be able to participate once we provide a new link. We will share the updated link shortly, so you can continue without any disruptions. Thank you for your patience and understanding.
👍19😱10🤔4
Notice: Treasure Hunt Login Issue Fix Some users are encountering a "Login is expired" pop-up, preventing the start of Treasure Hunt. To resolve this issue, please enter the /start command in the Treasure Hunt chat to restart the game. If the problem persists, feel free to reach out for further assistance. Join the Treasure Hunt: https://t.me/wavex_treasurehunt_bot
👍26
🚨 Haven’t joined the event yet? The $1,000 giveaway has less than a week left! ⏳ Join now for your chance to win $1,000! 💸 https://x.com/waveX_fi/status/1829116242927501316
🔥23👍18
We’re thrilled to have the chance to go mainstream with Soneium through the Soneium Spark. We believe waveX is the next big thing for Soneium – and we’re ready to prove it! 🔥🔥 Let’s make waves together! 🌊 #GMwithSoneium https://x.com/soneium/status/1831936116649238654
👍12
We're in the DeFi section of the Soneium ecosystem. waveX is the leading Perp DEX on the Soneium network. 🔥 Go mainstream with Soneium 💿 Pre-mine waveX points: http://t.me/wavex_treasurehunt_bot https://x.com/SoneiumEco/status/1829658865627226420
🔥16🤩5👍1
We’re attending the Soneium event! 💿💿 If you’re here too, come say hi! 👋
🔥15👍10
🛠 We identified a minor error during the process of charging RUBY in Treasure Hunt, but it has been quickly fixed. If you have completed the Star payment but didn't receive the RUBY, please try charging RUBY again in Treasure Hunt. Update Details: ✅ Fix RUBY charging error
🔥68❤26👍22
So many adventurers diving in #TreasureHunt and collecting WP! 🔥🔥 Ready to join the Treasure Hunt? 💎 Join Treasure Hunt: http://t.me/wavex_treasurehunt_bot Join $1,000 Airdrop Event: https://gleam.io/fMTSs/treasure-hunt-airdrop-event
🔥14❤6👍6
🚨 Don't miss your chance to win big! 🚨 Our $1,000 giveaway is still live, but time is running out! ⏳ Join the Treasure Hunt now, collect waveX points(WP), and grab your shot at $1,000! 🏆 https://x.com/waveX_fi/status/1829116242927501316
👍25❤6
Dive into waveX's Treasure Hunt! 🌊 We're celebrating the launch of our new Telegram app with a $1,000 giveaway! 💰 Join the event: https://gleam.io/fMTSs/treasure-hunt-airdrop-event 🎁 Prizes: 1,000 USDT in total 📅 Event: 8/29 - 9/11 (UTC) | Winners: 9/16
🔥111👍19❤11👏6
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @wavex_announce. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 993,088 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@wavex_announce named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“waveX” (@wavex_announce), 1,770 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wavex_announce.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.