Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net -324. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83,526–84,741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 13:21
84,277
+118
19 Sept 2026, 02:01
84,159
+137
16 Sept 2026, 16:16
84,022
+42
14 Sept 2026, 16:59
83,980
+120
13 Sept 2026, 04:59
83,860
+8
11 Sept 2026, 06:19
83,852
+137
8 Sept 2026, 10:59
83,715
+49
5 Sept 2026, 03:56
83,666
-69
3 Sept 2026, 08:37
83,735
-25
2 Sept 2026, 02:52
83,760
-41
1 Sept 2026, 01:45
83,801
-50
30 Aug 2026, 23:04
83,851
-27
30 Aug 2026, 00:43
83,878
-44
29 Aug 2026, 00:13
83,922
-28
27 Aug 2026, 23:27
83,950
-42
26 Aug 2026, 19:57
83,992
+13
25 Aug 2026, 20:26
83,979
-49
24 Aug 2026, 22:44
84,028
-75
23 Aug 2026, 08:56
84,103
-19
21 Aug 2026, 17:37
84,122
first reading
Engagement
94 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 118 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.30%
avg views ÷ 84,277 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,460
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 94 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held
94 (4 August 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total
223,130
Reactions total
3,272
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Oct 2026, 01:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,170
Videos
≈5,500
Links
≈1,250
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18m 17s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 68 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,916 reactions across 93 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,724
59.7%
🥰
1,628
20.6%
custom 5402518385294584625
1,510
19.1%
🤔
54
0.682%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 93 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,916 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 93 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @s_golovoj. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 94 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Шаблон для трендового видео с машиной🧟♀️
Похожие видео собирают миллионы просмотров и уже появился шаблон, где не нужно писать промты.
Переходим по ссылке: ШАБЛОН VeoSeeBot
Загружаем фотографи вашего лица и фото машины;
Отправляем на генерацию🫴🏻
Вирусный тренд — ваша реакция🧘🏼♀️
Авторы снимают свою реакцию на разные ситуации. В зависимости от возраста или контекста реакция меняется, выглядит смешно и ооочень жизненно.
Подержите канал для открытия кастомных реакций — https://t.me/boost/s_golovoj 🥺🩵
Первое видео
Второе видео
Еще один вау-тренд!💃
Расскажите аудитории, какой Вселенной были бы вы? Видеоряд может быть из ваших фото или просто из вайбовых картинок.
Буду рада вашей поддержке, проголосуйте за канал, чтобы вернуть реакцию — https://t.me/boost/s_golovoj
Первое видео
Второе видео
Не давай мне надежду🫸🏻
Суть видео показать на листочке то, что очень хочется, но вы этого не делаете по своим причинам. Ролики носят шуточный характер, а еще очень залипательный трек 🤪
Первое видео
Второе видео
❤️ — если рассказывать про второй тренд
Это видео я сделала за 20 минут😭
Уже давно хотела протестировать нейросети в предметной «съемке», будто я сама пошла в студию и начала снимать контент для бренда.
Получилось так круто! Перенесла свое лицо, одежду бренда и продукт бренда. Собрала все в один рекламный ролик💃🏻💃🏻💃🏻 Понимаете, на сколько сейчас просто создавать продукт ТАКОГО уровня?
В 4 потоке курса все покажу своим студентам. А если вы хотите запрыгн…
Осенние картинки с оленями возвращаются 🤩
В прошлом году стало популярным добавлять на свои фотографии разных животных или предметы. Выглядит все еще актуально, делюсь промтом:
Добавь на мою фотографию трех реалистичных маленьких пятнистых оленей. Они стоят около меня. Впиши оленей реалистично, кто-то лежит, а кто-то стоит
Ссылка на пост 🦌
Тренд — пробы на роль🎬
Уже многие снимают тренд, где показывают свои «визитки» на определенную роль в кино. Кто-то снимает реальные роли, а кто-то шутит и делает видео смешным, по приколу))
В этом суть! 😭🩵
Очень понравилась идея поста, где автор пишет фразы с минусами поездок или разными ситуациями из жизни. Но чаще всего именно из-за этого мы это делаем — в этом суть!
Делюсь ссылкой на пост, помним, что можно адаптировать под себя!
Ссылка на пост
Создаем такое видео через нейросеть 🫥
Классная идея, чтобы удивить своих близких и друзей! В видео вы едете на мерседесе 🫢
Переходим по ссылке: ШАБЛОН VeoSeeBot
Загружаем фотографи вашего лица;
Отправляем на генерацию🫴🏻
Игнорируем маленькие просмотры🧘🏼♀️
Обожаю этот тип контента, когда авторы освобождаются от гонки за просмотры и снимают себя без стеснения. Просто такие, какие они есть!
В этом стиле можно снимать разные видео, писать свои мысли на весь экран. Они точно найдут свою аудиторию 🫴🏻🩵
А вот еще одна идея для перехода🎬
Снять можно по-разному, с одним или несколькими переходами. Эффектнее несколько образов выглядит! Но если вы показываете кардинальные изменения, то это будет также эффектно.
Кстати! На курсе мы изучаем все креативные техники съемки, поэтому если вы давно хотели научиться, можно запрыгнуть в последний вагон🤞🏻
Ссылка на звук🤍
Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @s_golovoj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@s_golovoj edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Цепляющий контент @smm_eng · 22,392 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 September 2026
Шпаргалка для бренда @iamshpargalka · 23,069 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 September 2026
Зебра Подслушала @gozebra · 26,759 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
РИЛС | REELS ТРЕНДЫ | ШАБЛОНЫ CAPCUT | МЕМЫ @reelstutor · 51,810 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 August 2026
SOFA SOLO | мастерская @soffasolo · 38,515 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 7 September 2026
NO REELS PLS (ШАБЛОНЫ МЕМОВ) @no_reels_pls · 31,700 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 6 September 2026
Мемперия Катерины Побоженко | Шаблоны и оригиналы | Мемы в REELS @formemas · 202,187 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Полина pro reels ✨ @polinarule · 22,815 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
piaceim • пресеты & блогинг @piaceimpresets · 126,416 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
kuulesh • creative @kuulesh · 37,651 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Мемы без надписей | видео шаблоны для рилс @membeztexta · 199,583 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
💭Мемы из reels | рилс инстаграм @memreels · 86,503 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
REELS | МЕМЫ | ШАБЛОНЫ CAPCUT @reels_memes · 136,030 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
Киселёва тут | AI • режиссура • портфолио @kiselevatut · 23,151 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
Шаблоны Cap Cut | Кап Кут @capcutemplates1 · 121,500 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 13 August 2026
Не pov, а reels @reels_by_piaceim · 46,361 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 29 August 2026
Кирилл Артамонов @artamonov_proreels · 25,012 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
Шаблоны CapCut & Reels • видео монтаж @top_capcut · 56,570 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 August 2026
ГАЙДЫ free ЧЕК-ЛИСТЫ @sliv_freedom · 73,809 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 August 2026
Пресеты Лайтрум | Presets Lightroom @presety · 308,345 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Шаблоны CapCut, Мемы, Монтаж @capcut_asst · 34,283 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
канал пользы от elipolyaa @elipolyaastori · 19,511 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 October 2026
Kava.ira | дизайн | маркетинг @visualkava · 20,930 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 September 2026
creativity | креатив и блогинг @creativity_ch · 34,231 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“С ГОЛОВОЙ 🎞” (@s_golovoj), 84,277 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/s_golovoj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.