мои хорошие, админу этого канала сегодня 33!🫛🪽🍏 планы на ближайший год: продолжать создавать, быть буськой и вдохновлять вас на красивые социальные сети🐄 💋
❤🔥31❤22🥰16

Channel
@mitrakissa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,402subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001605126695 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mitrakissa |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mitrakissa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 5,402 | +21 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 5,381 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 5,392 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 5,390 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 5,389 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (11 April 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 484 |
| Reactions total | 69 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
855 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 326 | 38.1% | |
| ❤ | 295 | 34.5% | |
| 🍓 | 78 | 9.12% | |
| 🔥 | 60 | 7.02% | |
| 💘 | 43 | 5.03% | |
| 🥰 | 43 | 5.03% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 1.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 855reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мои хорошие, админу этого канала сегодня 33!🫛🪽🍏 планы на ближайший год: продолжать создавать, быть буськой и вдохновлять вас на красивые социальные сети🐄 💋
❤🔥31❤22🥰16
stories — mitrakisa🍎️ pinned «обмен контактами 。・:*˚:✧。 я точно знаю, что тут есть девчонки дизайнеры и может быть другие прекрасные специалисты? у меня очень часто просят контакты див, кто умеет дизайнить соцсети (например оформить карусельку или хайлайтс или помочь с монтажом) пусть…»
официально заявляю: я собрала на канале ТУПО ЛУЧШИХ ТВОРЦОВ В МИРЕ!!!😭🍏🌸 пусть ваши заказчики найдутся 🌟🤍 сделаю закреп поста
❤🔥35❤1
обмен контактами 。・:*˚:✧。 я точно знаю, что тут есть девчонки дизайнеры и может быть другие прекрасные специалисты? у меня очень часто просят контакты див, кто умеет дизайнить соцсети (например оформить карусельку или хайлайтс или помочь с монтажом) пусть этот пост будет небольшим нетворкингом — оставьте комментарий с ссылочками на свои контакты и портфолио/работы, если есть и небольшим сообщением, чем вы можете п…
❤🔥32❤16🔥11
НОВЫЙ ВИМЗИКАЛ ШРИИИИИФТ!!!! эхэхэхэх) ну вы извините, но это просто дроп века — хороший красивый вимзикал шрифт в кириллице, которым удобно оформлять всё, шо захотите🩷 я пока его сделала, конечно сто потов сошло, так как есть такие ньюансы, что чем более буквы кривые с длинными палочками перекладинами, тем хуже они смотрятся в массиве текста... ну и я оплатила ресурс, чтобы наконец-то в шрифт влезли и заглавные и…
❤🔥70❤36🔥26🥰10💘2👍1
А еще, кто был в Азии в каких странах? Поделитесь: где больше всего зашло, а где прям совсем нет? Я вот думаю о Японии и Китае и никак не пойму, куда бы в первую очередь выбрать🍎
❤10
дайджест news из жизни: пока меня не было в канале, я успела съездить в свое первое азиатское путешествие —> была в Таиланде и Индонезии, впечатлений столько, что даже не могу описать! это было оч круто и одновременно очень сложно, настолько что после путешествия я неделю уже как дома и просто сплю и прихожу в себя🩷 перед отъездом у меня была насыщенная двухнедельная рабочая жизнь — делала сайт подруге на запуск к…
🍓17❤11❤🔥10
это что? это легендарное возвращение креатора приготовила вам огромный пак со стразиками🩷они оч ща популярны у зарубежных креаторов🙄 жду от вас реакции и гружу в комментарии — 100+ штук в хорошем качестве там и сердечки и звездочки и мореее всякогооо
❤🔥78❤42💘41🔥12
всем приветиксы в этом чатике!⭐️ тыщу лет не записывала свои мысли, а тут решила пофилософствовать на тему «себя искать не надо, надо вспомнить каким ты был в 12-13 лет»👀🍎 очень хочется услышать ваше мнение на этот счет, буду рада почитать ваши идеи на сколько это может быть правдой)
❤22🔥11👍9
давайте ЩЕДРО отсыпем лайков этому паку🩷 что тут? а тут 30+ фонов, которые вы нигде не найдете...а почему? а потому что я двое суток их создавала почти в ручную+две нейронки и недюженная смекалка как всегда делаю то, что сама бы использовала в контенте🌟 буду рада вашим комментам и отметочкам и репостам🙄 так как я все это отдаю совершенно бесплатно, надеюсь на энергообмен🩷
❤135❤🔥70🍓61🥰17
stories — mitrakisa🍎️ pinned a photo
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mitrakissa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 503,914 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“stories — mitrakisa🍎️” (@mitrakissa), 5,402 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mitrakissa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.