Осенние вайбы срочно подключены к этому каналу!
❤34💅15

Channel
@miniiiriba
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,144subscribers
+106 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001768501352 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miniiiriba |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miniiiriba |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 9,144 | +16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:06 | 9,128 | +13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 9,115 | +13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 9,102 | +27 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 9,075 | +61 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 9,014 | +7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 9,007 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 9,013 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 9,019 | -19 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 9,038 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 9,038 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (31 July 2026 – 27 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,497 |
| Reactions total | 395 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
812 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 324 | 39.9% | |
| 💔 | 169 | 20.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 151 | 18.6% | |
| 🔥 | 71 | 8.74% | |
| 🍓 | 49 | 6.03% | |
| 💅 | 35 | 4.31% | |
| 👀 | 13 | 1.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 812 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @miniiiriba. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Осенние вайбы срочно подключены к этому каналу!
❤34💅15
обещала вам сделать подборку новых шрифтов и собрала такую вкуснятину! Важно! Обязательно проверяйте лицензию шрифтов, где можно использовать, в каких целях: коммерческих и личных! Особенно, если вы дизайнер и смм и тд и хотите шрифты брать в проекты Вы можете добавить эти шрифты в CapCut, vn и в studio, о котором я писала выше Как добавить в studio можете - [глянуть тут] *все файлы шрифтов в комментариях
❤25🔥13💅3
Posted without readable text
❤🔥18❤13💔6💅4
Проживаю немного странный период в своем блоге, он вот не плохой, а именно странный С одной стороны я очень собой горжусь, так как за август я сделала около 17 единиц контента, сегодняшний день не учитываю! То есть за 19 дней 17 публикаций — круто! Плюс мне сейчас самой очень нравится мой блог, контент, я прям Кайфую от всех всех постов С другой же стороны… хейтеры и отписки 😏 Отписки, как по мне логичны, я стала…
💔33❤25🔥5
Posted without readable text
❤🔥23💅10💔10❤3
идея, как показать одни из своих самых классных воспоминаний! Делала в vn, 70 кадров по 0,1с ровно на 7 секунд аудиодорожки пнг с флешкой и текстом оставила для вас в комментариях 🤍
❤39❤🔥18
эстетика выходного дня 🌲📻🤎🌊🧳🐶🍐
❤49❤🔥28
Мои хорошкииии, принесла вам классную новость и возможность проявиться как блогер и контент-креатор 19 августа в Москве пройдет k-Beaty фестиваль, на котором соберутся около 800 блогеров, креаторов, чтобы затестить косметику вживую, поснимать контент или найти контент-подуржку 💅 каждый участник получит набор, в котором будет 30 полноразмерных баночек популярных корейских брендов!!! Это вообще вау крутота Чтобы ста…
❤🔥8🍓6❤4👀3
ну чтооооо, туториал!?!!!! как сделать тот самый ваушный пост с символами 💔 😈 Сразу оставляю [ссылку на сайт]
🔥33❤🔥15❤6💔6
в последнюю неделю у меня активизировались хейтеры, а я этому и рада… и нет, не потому, что это возможность выплеснуть агрессию, а потому, что это тоже точка роста я не считаю себя и свой блог каким-то провокационным, хайпующим на инфоповодах и дальше по списку но я всегда буду защищать свое — творчество, идеи, мои фото и свои достижения! Не поверите, но меня захейтили за достижения, которые я делала в посте пере…
🔥18🍓10❤6
Когда раздавали нормальную кожу, то я видимо пропустила кого-то в очереди… Мне досталось акне на теле, которое меня бесит больше, чем какие-то локальные высыпания на лице Случай у меня не из легких, так как у меня большая площадь акне, работаем мы над ним с врачом 🥲 Так что теперь я на постоянной основе должна дружить с гелями и кремами для тела, в которых есть кислоты, так как они помогают поддерживать кожу в бол…
🍓15❤🔥12❤7🔥1
Очередное доказательство, что невозможно нравиться всем (Следущий пост —это комментарий под постом, где незнакомый человек украл мою фотографию и поставил на аву) Сколько бы я не проявляла свою реально хорошую личность.. Сколько бы я не делилась бесплатно классными материалами для контента и не только… Сколько бы туторов я не делала, чтобы помочь новичкам… Сколько бы не писала про ценности и принципы… Даже, если…
💔23🍓9❤7
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @miniiiriba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Душная miniiriba” (@miniiiriba), 9,144 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miniiiriba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.