8 measurements spanning 19 days, net -114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,929–7,077 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 11:22
6,946
-21
22 Aug 2026, 14:03
6,967
-23
19 Aug 2026, 11:17
6,990
-25
16 Aug 2026, 21:33
7,015
-15
13 Aug 2026, 05:24
7,030
-12
9 Aug 2026, 19:11
7,042
-16
6 Aug 2026, 18:50
7,058
-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:04
7,060
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.41%
avg views ÷ 6,946 subscribers
Avg views / post
237
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
21 (6 May 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
237
Reactions total
12
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
305 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
86
28.2%
custom 5364183216607493402
68
22.3%
❤
59
19.3%
⚡
48
15.7%
👍
33
10.8%
🐳
3
0.984%
❤🔥
2
0.656%
🎉
2
0.656%
👏
2
0.656%
🤔
1
0.328%
🤩
1
0.328%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 305reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ivpay_io. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 May 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Gate has made the decision to delist IVPAY.
Over the recent period, we have discussed various possible solutions with you, considered different options, and engaged with potential partners. The partners proposed their own terms, but unfortunately, we were unable to find a solution that would work for all parties. At the same time, we held several discussions with the exchange itself and tried to resolve the liquidit…
We previously announced the upcoming integration between our new payment service and the IVPAY ecosystem. Our team is now actively working on the technical implementation. Once launched, the service will generate its own stream of online transactions. A portion of the revenue from every transaction will be allocated to the continued development of the project and its products. 👍
However, we don't have good news rega…
IVPAY is looking for one strategic partner for a joint marketing campaign. 😍
We already have a complete marketing strategy and a unique value proposition. The only thing we need from our partner is an active community. Financial investment from the project owner is not required.
If you're a project owner and would like to discuss a partnership, contact our team. 🤝
If you know a project that might be interested, te…
Staking is now live! 😍
The staking pools have limited capacity and will fill up over time. If you're planning to participate, don't wait. You can buy IVPAY on Gate, where only a small number of tokens remain available.
From here, the choice is yours:
• stake your tokens and earn a guaranteed return;
• use them in the game for a chance to earn a higher bonus.
If your tokens are stuck in the bridge, please contact u…
For those who missed our previous posts, we've prepared a step-by-step guide on how to stake your tokens. 🫡
1. Buy IVPAY tokens on Gate and withdraw them to your personal wallet. We recommend using MetaMask or any compatible wallet.
2. Create a Tonkeeper wallet and fund it with at least 1 GRAM (TON). These funds will be used to pay transaction fees on the TON network. This wallet will also display all the necessary…
The staking section is now available in the IVPAY app. 😍
Link app: t.me/ivpay_game_bot
You can open it today and prepare your balance before the staking pools go live. There are two important things you should know:
1. Staking Vault and Game Vault are two separate accounts.
If you want to participate in staking, you must deposit your tokens into the Vault on the Staking page. The Game Vault balance cannot be used…
⚡️️️️Important update!⚡️️️️
For everyone who asked for it: we've decided to test this after all and see how well it works for both the project and the community. We want to find the right balance between providing value for you and supporting the token's long-term development.
On July 9 at 16:00 GMT, we'll launch staking. It will be integrated into the game, so make sure to transfer your tokens through the bridge i…
A few updates about our game. 👨💻
First, we've added an additional layer of security to better protect your accounts and your assets in the game. Because of this, you may occasionally be asked to reconnect your wallet when logging in. This is completely normal. Just reconnect your wallet, and everything will continue working as usual.
Second, for those who haven't seen it yet: we've added a new command to our Teleg…
Earlier, we announced that the project was preparing a new partnership. Today, we're ready to share a few more details. 🤏
A project approached us with the goal of building a service capable of accepting payments through multiple payment methods. The cryptocurrency payment infrastructure will be powered entirely by IVPAY's technology. This will be a partnership, so our project will be clearly referenced throughout th…
The game has now reached 40 million locked tokens, which means we're burning another 10 million tokens! 🥳
https://bscscan.com/tx/0x35dc2afb238707a3ed1065293e5f06444313faf7d0265b3f1e1ac3458d37d85c
That brings the total amount of locked and burned tokens to 80 million. That's 8% of the total supply and approximately one quarter of the market supply, according to BscScan. There are now significantly fewer sell orders …
Important Notice ⚡️️️
We have noticed that some users have listed their NFTs for sale on the GetGems marketplace at various prices in hopes of attracting buyers. We strongly recommend not purchasing NFTs from other users, as they may have already been redeemed. In that case, you will receive only the image, without any tokens inside. If you are unsure, you can always check the NFT's status directly in the game. At t…
🔥7⚡4👍3custom 53641832166074934021
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @ivpay_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 607,703 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Staynex Announcement Channel @staynexcomannouncement · 64,636 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 21 August 2026
Galaxy Lab @galaxylabofficial · 52,127 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
CVALPHA_NEWS @CVALPHA_news · 60,127 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Solanium @solanium_io · 84,461 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Edu3Labs Updates @edu3labsupdates · 107,575 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IVPAY” (@ivpay_io), 6,946 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivpay_io.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
