Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

پروکسی قوی | Proxy Qavi

@proxy_ghavy

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

94,765subscribers

-173 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001265139113
TypeChannel
Username@proxy_ghavy
Descriptionتلاش = موفقیت
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/proxy_ghavy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@parsaproxy/2285225 Jun 2026, 19:09 UTC@proxy_ghavy/14563 · this entry25 Jun 2026, 19:09 UTC1.00under a minute
@proxy_ghavy/14566 · this entry28 Jun 2026, 05:22 UTC@parsaproxy/2285528 Jun 2026, 05:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@proxy_ghavy/14568 · this entry4 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC@parsaproxy/228574 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@proxy_ghavy/14573 · this entry9 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC@parsaproxy/228619 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@proxy_ghavy/14575 · this entry18 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC@parsaproxy/2286318 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC1.00under a minute
@proxy_ghavy/14580 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC@parsaproxy/228663 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@parsaproxy15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (87)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @parsaproxy. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

94,76594,93894,851.56 August 2026 — 94,938 subscribers7 August 2026 — 94,938 subscribers8 August 2026 — 94,898 subscribers9 August 2026 — 94,860 subscribers10 August 2026 — 94,816 subscribers11 August 2026 — 94,779 subscribers12 August 2026 — 94,765 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -173. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 94,739–94,964 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:4694,765-14
11 Aug 2026, 02:4694,779-37
10 Aug 2026, 01:0294,816-44
9 Aug 2026, 01:4094,860-38
8 Aug 2026, 03:1394,898-40
7 Aug 2026, 05:4294,938no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:0194,938first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.7%
avg views ÷ 94,765 subscribers
Avg views / post
25,300
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.617%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held24 (23 June 202610 August 2026)
Views total303,140
Reactions total1,869
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,780
Videos
402
Links
7,170

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,007 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
77625.8%
👍73624.5%
😢63621.2%
👎39413.1%
😁35611.8%
🔥782.59%
🥰311.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC≈7,920 views131 reactionsread 12 August 2026

بیش از ۸۰٪ کارت‌کشیدن‌های مردم زیر ۶۰۰ هزار تومنه و بالای ۸۰ میلیون فقط ۰.۰۷٪!!! من واقعاً نمی‌دونم این۸۰٪چی می‌خرن که هر بار زیر۶۰۰تومن تموم می‌شه؟ چون ۴ قلم جنس معمولی تو شهروند و رفاه و افق هم حدود ۱ میلیونی می‌شه! این آمار بهترین آماریه که سطح زندگی مردم ایران رو مشخص میکنه. پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی @Proxy_ghavy👈

😢10714🔥5👍2🥰2😁1

10 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC≈7,920 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‏خیابون ها خلاصه شده تو سوپرمارکت، کافه، فست فود و داروخانه! بقیه ی شغل ها منقرض شدن و مردن.. _ال احمدو_ پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی @Proxy_ghavy👈

😢50👍294🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈15,800 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

هنوزم می‌رید ی مثقال ملیله شکسته سایز 11 مثقالی 40 الی 50 تومن میخری ملیله تایوانی اصل با کیفیت عالی با قیمت باور نکردنی موجوده کافیه روی لینک زیر ویدیو اینستا رو ببین زیرش بنویس گچی لیست قیمت و رنگبندی برات ارسال میشه 😍 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbtPABNs29U/?igsh=MXNpam1nbWpqYjMzMQ== ضمنا میتوانید به آیدی ما در تلگرام ارتباط برقرار کنید👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 @Asra_Shop_Ir10

12👎2

7 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC≈14,900 views88 reactionsread 12 August 2026

من وقتی بچه بودم کتاب زیاد میخوندم خیلی‌هاشون رو اصلا یادم نمیاد و نمیدونم فایده‌ای داشتند یا نه! اما شاید ۱۴ ساله‌م بود جمله‌ای در یک کتاب دیدم که تمام مسیر فکری بعدی من رو تعیین کرد؛ نمیخوام باورت را تغییر بدی یا باور مرا بپذیری فقط میخوام بپذیری هر باوری امکان خطا بودن دارد پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی @Proxy_ghavy👈

👍5622👎8🥰1😁1

4 Aug 2026, 08:27 UTC≈22,900 views300 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴 مسعودد پزشکیان : نه استعفا دادم،نه میدم،نه خواهم داد بلکه محکم می ایستم. پروکسی | پروکسی | پروکسی @Proxy_ghavy👈

😁164👍63👎4623😢4

3 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈24,200 views75 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

گفته اند عشق و عطسه را نمی توان پنهان کرد... حتی یک عطسه‌ی کوتاه حتی یک "عشقِ کوچک" #آن_سكستون اتصال پروکسی @Proxy_ghavy👈 کانال پروکسی قوی

👍4716👎7😢4😁1

3 Aug 2026, 01:31 UTC≈21,100 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

رواقِ منظـرِ چشـم من آشیانه‌ توست کرم نما و فـرود آ که خانه خانه‌ توست دلت به‌وصل گل ای بلبل صبا خـوش باد که در چمن همه گلبانگ عاشقـانه‌ توست.. #حافــظ اتصال پروکسی @Proxy_ghavy👈 کانال پروکسی قوی

36🔥3😁1

24 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC≈31,000 views412 reactionsread 12 August 2026

متاسفانه اکبر عبدی هنرمند محبوب ایران درگذشت

😢34351😁9👍5🔥4

23 Jul 2026, 11:33 UTC≈33,700 views194 reactionsread 12 August 2026

این زندگی چیزهای زیادی به من بدهکار است، اما مهم‌ترینش یک جوانیِ بدون رنج و نگرانی در یک سرزمین آرام است. ✍🏻 کیمیا رجبی اتصال پروکسی @Proxy_ghavy👈 کانال پروکسی قوی

👍11840😢20👎7🥰7😁2

19 Jul 2026, 22:11 UTC≈41,400 views333 reactionsread 12 August 2026

اسپانیا قهرمان جام جهانی شد

211🔥37👍35👎21😢16😁10🥰3

18 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC≈44,200 views127 reactionsread 12 August 2026

چطور ممکنه در زندگی از کسی جلوتر یا عقب تر باشی وقتی در مسیری حرکت میکنی که فقط خودت میتونی اون رو طی کنی... اتصال پروکسی @Proxy_ghavy👈 کانال پروکسی قوی

👍8128😢7👎5😁3🥰2🔥1

18 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC≈38,100 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

چجوری به در می‌گین دیوار می‌شنوه؟ من تو رو طرف مستقیم حرفو می‌زنم نمی‌فهمه باز ... اتصال پروکسی @Proxy_ghavy👈 کانال پروکسی قوی

😁44👍158😢4

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @proxy_ghavy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 269,953 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

www.instagram.comregistrable domain: instagram.com1 post · 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“پروکسی قوی | Proxy Qavi” (@proxy_ghavy), 94,765 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proxy_ghavy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.