Channel
@Dehghani_Safir_Sanandaj
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
231subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002110691209 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dehghani_Safir_Sanandaj |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dehghani_Safir_Sanandaj |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 231 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 230 | +4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 226 | no change |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 226 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
45 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 26.7% | |
| 🫡 | 10 | 22.2% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 👾 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
To my lovely students in Class 305, Just a little reminder that the party we talked about is happening tomorrow! 🙌🏼 Apart from those of you who kindly volunteered to bring dessert and cake, if you’d like, feel free to bring any snacks, drinks, or treats you enjoy so we can share, have fun, and enjoy some time together. 🙂↔️🥳🫶🏼 See you tomorrow! 💕
🐳1👀1😍1
To gorgeous 502 girls, Tomorrow’s Discussion : Come Prepared! Tomorrow, we’re going to have a deeper-than-usual discussion in class .. Our main question is: “Is a life worth living if it is not a happy life?” Think beyond the simple question of whether happiness is important. We’re going to discuss : happiness, suffering, purpose, love, success, freedom, morality, death, and the meaning of life. Before class,…
🫡2👍1💔1
#Adult_305 #Homework ▪️Workbook : Part 10.4 ▪️ Submit your 2nd writing
❤1🫡1🙏1
#Adult_305 ▫️2nd writing ❕Deadline : Tuesday, 20 Mordad 1405, 11:59 PM
❤2🙏1
#Adult_502 #Homework ▪️Workbook : Part 4.4 ▪️ Submit your 2nd writing
❤3
#Adult_502 ▫️2nd writing ❕Deadline : Tuesday, 20 Mordad 1405, 11:59 PM
❤3
#Adult_502 Vocabulary
💘3
#Adult_305 #Homework ▪️Workbook : Part 9.3
🫡2
#Adult_305 Functional language
🐳2
#Adult_502 #Homework ▪️Workbook : Part 4.3
🫡3
#Adult_502 Functional language
👾3
Dehghani (Safir Sanandaj) pinned «❕Oxford units ▪️ Level 502 : 16- 64- 66- 65 ▪️ Level 305 : 75 - 78 - 27 - 28»
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Dehghani_Safir_Sanandaj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dehghani (Safir Sanandaj)” (@Dehghani_Safir_Sanandaj), 231 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dehghani_Safir_Sanandaj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.