📥 در کانال @rss_ai_ir هر روز: 🔹 جدیدترین خبرهای AI و فناوری
🗯اولویت ما هوش مصنوعی در صنعت میباشد اما نیم نگاهی به موارد دیگر در این زمینه داریم
ارتباط با ادمین 1:
@Ad1_rss_ai_ir
کانال کتاب ها:
@rss_ai_books
آدرس گروه
@rss_ai_ir_group
Created
Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5,328. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,241–12,836 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 21:03
11,445
-39
11 Aug 2026, 21:36
11,484
-87
10 Aug 2026, 19:17
11,571
-64
9 Aug 2026, 19:55
11,635
-56
8 Aug 2026, 17:43
11,691
-147
7 Aug 2026, 19:26
11,838
-122
6 Aug 2026, 20:33
11,960
+5,843
6 Aug 2026, 03:22
6,117
no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:17
6,117
first reading
Engagement
139 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.30%
avg views ÷ 11,445 subscribers
Avg views / post
263
139 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
139
of 139 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 128 of 139 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held
139 (5 August 2026 – 13 August 2026)
Views total
36,575
Reactions total
409
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 04:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,580
Videos
≈1,630
Links
≈1,540
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 51m
Average length
2m 11s
Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
349 reactions across 109 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
193
55.3%
👍
68
19.5%
🔥
38
10.9%
👏
23
6.59%
😁
7
2.01%
😍
4
1.15%
🙏
4
1.15%
🥰
4
1.15%
🤬
3
0.86%
🤯
2
0.573%
😢
1
0.287%
😱
1
0.287%
🤣
1
0.287%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 139 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 409reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.719%
1 of 139 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
334
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
343
over 138 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFJGdcuX
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Die-cut sticker icon of a [subject], bold thick black linework, hand-drawn retro line art style, small sparkle and star accents, cream off-white fill, minimal flat shading, vintage cafe branding aesthetic, vector illustration style, white sticker border outline.
🚨🧠 آیا Kimi K3 از «افکار پنهان» Claude آموزش دیده است؟
یک پژوهش تازه بحث جالبی درباره نحوه آموزش مدلهای بزرگ هوش مصنوعی ایجاد کرده است. پژوهشگران روشی برای بازیابی بخشی از بلوکهای Reasoning پنهان مدلهای بسته پیدا کردهاند و سپس بررسی کردهاند که آیا مدلهای دیگر نشانهای از آشنایی با این مسیرهای استدلالی دارند یا خیر.
🔍 عجیبترین نتیجه مربوط به Kimi K3 از Moonshot AI بوده است.
در آزمایشها، وقتی بخش بسیار کوچکی…
🤖💻عامل Prime Agent؛ رقیب جدید Claude Code با حافظهای که خودش را بازسازی میکند!
آزمایشگاه Prime Intellect یک عامل خط فرمان جدید با نام Prime Agent منتشر کرده است؛ ابزاری شبیه Claude Code که مستقیماً داخل ترمینال کار میکند، اما دو ایده جالب RLM و Continual Harness را به معماری خود اضافه کرده است. 🚀
🧠 ایده اصلی چیست؟
عامل Prime Agent فقط یک رابط برای مدل زبانی نیست؛ یک لایه عامل روی مدل قرار میدهد که میتواند وظ…
🎨🔥مدل Stable-Layers؛ یک تصویر معمولی را دوباره به لایههای قابل ویرایش تبدیل کنید!
شرکت Stability AI مدل جدیدی با نام Stable-Layers منتشر کرده که میتواند یک تصویر تخت و نهایی را به مجموعهای از لایههای مستقل RGBA تجزیه کند. 🤯
یعنی تصویری که قبلاً فقط یک فایل نهایی بود، دوباره میتواند به اجزایی مانند:
🔹 پسزمینه
🔹 شخصیتها
🔹 اشیاء
🔹 عناصر جلویی و پشتی
🔹 لایههای دارای شفافیت (Alpha)
تفکیک شود.
🪄 بخش جذابتر ای…
🤖🇺🇸 تقریباً نیمی از استعدادهای هوش مصنوعی آمریکا فقط در کالیفرنیا هستند!
این نقشه بهخوبی نشان میدهد که جغرافیای نیروی متخصص هوش مصنوعی و یادگیری ماشین در آمریکا تا چه اندازه متمرکز است.
📊 براساس دادههای نمایشدادهشده در نمودار، ۴۹.۳٪ از کارکنان AI/ML در این مجموعهداده در ایالت کالیفرنیا قرار دارند؛ یعنی تقریباً از هر دو متخصص، یک نفر!
این تمرکز با دادههای Pave درباره منطقه خلیج سانفرانسیسکو نیز همخوانی دار…
🌐🎥ابزار MultiSplat؛ ساخت صحنههای چهاربعدی از چند اسکن Gaussian Splatting
ابزار رایگانی با نام MultiSplat برای ترکیب چند برداشت مختلف از یک مکان واحد معرفی شده است؛ برداشتهایی که میتوانند در زمانها و شرایط متفاوت ثبت شده باشند. 🔥
برای مثال، تصور کنید یک کارخانه، ساختمان یا محیط شهری را امروز اسکن کنید و چند ماه بعد دوباره از همان محل تصویربرداری کنید. MultiSplat کمک میکند این صحنههای Gaussian Splatting در یک …
🚨🤖 شایعات GPT-6 داغتر شد؛ آیا قدرتمندترین مدل OpenAI همین ماه میرسد؟
گزارش تازهای درباره GPT-6 منتشر شده که ادعا میکند نسل بعدی مدلهای OpenAI ممکن است در آگوست ۲۰۲۶ معرفی شود؛ البته هنوز هیچ تاریخ عرضه یا مشخصات رسمی از سوی OpenAI تأیید نشده و اطلاعات فعلی باید در حد Leak و شایعه در نظر گرفته شوند.
🔥 نکته مهم این گزارش این است که GPT-6 ظاهراً قرار نیست صرفاً نسخه ارتقایافتهای از GPT-5 باشد.
طبق اطلاعات فاشش…
🚁🤖 پهپادهایی با «دست رباتیک»؛ نسل جدید رباتهای پرنده وارد کار صنعتی میشود
دو شرکت چینی E-HAWK و WINDSHAPE پهپادهایی معرفی کردهاند که علاوه بر پرواز، به بازوها و ابزارهای رباتیک مجهز هستند و میتوانند مستقیماً روی تجهیزات صنعتی کار انجام دهند. 🔧📡
شرکت WINDSHAPE از ماه ژوئن تحویل محدود مدل M500 را آغاز کرده و E-HAWK نیز سفارشهای محصول خود با سامانه فن کانالی را میپذیرد.
🧠 در M500، کنترل پرواز و حرکت ابزار رباتی…
🎨🔥مدل FLUX 3 تا صبح دوشنبه ۱۷ آگوست رایگان شد!
فرصت خوبی برای کسانی که میخواهند FLUX 3 را بدون هزینه آزمایش کنند. طبق اعلام منتشرشده، دسترسی رایگان به این مدل تا صبح دوشنبه ۱۷ آگوست ادامه خواهد داشت. ⏳
🧪 اگر قصد تست دارید، فرصت مناسبی است تا مدل را با سناریوهای سختتر به چالش بکشید:
🔹 پرامپتهای پیچیده و چندجزئی
🔹 تولید متن داخل تصویر
🔹 حفظ جزئیات سوژهها
🔹 تصاویر فوتورئالیستی
🔹 نورپردازی و ترکیببندی پیچیده
🔹 مق…
₿📚 دو منبع عالی برای فهم ریاضیات و فناوری پشت بیتکوین
اگر میخواهید بیتکوین را فراتر از خریدوفروش و نمودار قیمت بشناسید و واقعاً بفهمید پشت پروتکل آن چه ریاضیات و سازوکارهایی قرار گرفته است، این دو منبع ارزش ذخیرهکردن دارند. 🧠
📘 منبع اول با عنوان The Mathematics of Bitcoin، بیتکوین را از دیدگاه ریاضی بررسی میکند.
در این اثر از مفاهیمی مانند:
🔹 نظریه احتمال
🔹 فرایندهای تصادفی (Stochastic Processes)
🔹 مارتینگل…
🎨🤖 وقتی هوش مصنوعی تلاش میکند شاهکار «گوتیک آمریکایی» را از نو نقاشی کند!
در یک آزمایش جالب، چند مدل هوش مصنوعی از جمله Claude Fable 5، Claude Opus 5 و GPT Sol با یک پرامپت یکسان روبهرو شدند:
🖌️ نقاشی معروف American Gothic اثر گرنت وود را مرحلهبهمرحله و تنها در قالب یک فایل HTML بازسازی کنید.
هدف فقط تولید یک تصویر نبود؛ مدلها باید فرایند ساخت نقاشی را قدمبهقدم ایجاد میکردند.
🧠 اما در این میان، عملکرد Fab…
🕷️🤖 بدلکار مرد عنکبوتی در دیزنی، یک ربات است!
آن مرد عنکبوتی که در پارک Avengers Campus کالیفرنیا به هوا پرتاب میشود و حرکات آکروباتیک انجام میدهد، همیشه یک بدلکار انسانی نیست؛ پشت بخشی از این نمایش، فناوری رباتیک پیشرفته Disney Imagineering قرار دارد. 🎢🔥
دیزنی برای چنین نمایشهایی خانوادهای از رباتهای بدلکار با فناوری Stuntronics توسعه داده است؛ رباتهایی که میتوانند هنگام پرواز، وضعیت بدن خود را کنترل کرده و…
❤4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @rss_ai_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ایا هزینه تامین اکانت های هوش مصنوعی[ نسخه های غیر رایگان] متناسب با درآمدتان هست؟
😊بله23%
😢خیر78%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 103,728 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VIRSUN” (@rss_ai_ir), 11,445 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rss_ai_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.