Отрывок из видео Сергея Кулдина. Про кризис)
❤10🔥7💯5🙏3

Channel
@notes_spirit
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
17,234subscribers
+370 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001802740891 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @notes_spirit |
| Description | Я Антон, автор этого канала. Читаю, перевожу книги. Делюсь тем, что откликается и иногда своими мыслями. Книги → @notes_spirit_bot По всем вопросам → @notes_spirit8 Admin: @Karina_notes_spirit |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/notes_spirit |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 16:49 | 17,234 | -1 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:07 | 17,235 | -6 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 10:22 | 17,241 | -8 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 07:26 | 17,249 | -3 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 05:36 | 17,252 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:39 | 17,255 | -7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:05 | 17,262 | -11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:19 | 17,273 | +2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:36 | 17,271 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 04:49 | 17,272 | -8 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:18 | 17,280 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:39 | 17,283 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 17,291 | +5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:47 | 17,286 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:27 | 17,288 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:31 | 17,289 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:09 | 17,287 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:39 | 17,294 | -16 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 03:29 | 17,310 | -19 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 17,329 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (17 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 22,522 |
| Reactions total | 1,291 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 05:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,076 reactions across 25 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,850 | 60.1% | |
| 🔥 | 498 | 16.2% | |
| 💯 | 293 | 9.53% | |
| ❤🔥 | 188 | 6.11% | |
| 🥰 | 76 | 2.47% | |
| 😁 | 60 | 1.95% | |
| 🤝 | 37 | 1.20% | |
| 😢 | 29 | 0.943% | |
| 🙏 | 29 | 0.943% | |
| ✍ | 9 | 0.293% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 0.13% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.065% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.033% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,076 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @notes_spirit. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Отрывок из видео Сергея Кулдина. Про кризис)
❤10🔥7💯5🙏3
Когда в жизни всё складывается удачно (дело, работа, творчество), легко начать связывать происходящее со своими качествами: вдохновением, способностями, знаниями. Но как только обстоятельства меняются в противоположную сторону, могут возникнуть сомнения: может, я потерял вдохновение, или не так умен или уже не нахожусь в том состоянии, в котором все давалось легко? Возникшие трудности, как ранее упоминал в одном из …
❤52🔥19❤🔥11
Немного оффтоп. Тема деревьев всегда цепляет:) Вот что писал об этом Джон Мьюра в те времена: «Любой дурак может уничтожить дерево. Оно не способно защитить себя или убежать. И мало кто из тех, кто уничтожает деревья, когда-либо сажает новые. Да и посадка новых деревьев мало поможет восстановить наших величественных древних гигантов... Несомненно, эти деревья дали бы хорошую древесину после прохождения через лесопи…
❤57😢25💯15❤🔥4🔥3🙏3🤯2
Природа может привести тебя к тишине. Это её дар тебе. – Э. Толле 🍁🍁🍄
❤85🥰18💯15🔥8❤🔥6
Власть, построенная на страхе, контроле и подчинении, отражает состояние сознания. То, что мы видим во внешнем мире, неотделимо от того, что происходит внутри нас. Стремление управлять другими, страх потерять, желание обладать и подчинять существуют не только в структурах власти. Они проявляются и в каждом из нас, когда мы отождествляем себя со своими страхами и желаниями. И пока мы видим источник зла снаружи, мы не…
❤76🔥28💯20✍1
Самая большая радость, которую даруют поля и леса, — это намек на скрытую связь между человеком и растительным миром. Этот эффект похож на прилив высшей мысли или глубокого чувства, посещающий нас тогда, когда нам кажется, что мы мыслим или поступаем абсолютно верно. И все же несомненно, что способность рождать этот восторг кроется не в самой природе, а в человеке — или в их гармоничном единении... 📕Отрывок из ново…
❤73🔥18🙏15
Как видеть игру человека, не забывая, кто перед нами: "Когда человек осознаёт, что за каждым стоит его собственная божественная природа, появляется возможность сознательно участвовать в игре. Человек предлагает вам какую-то игру, а вы уже видите в нём Бога. Вам не нужно доминировать над ним, вы можете взаимодействовать с ним на равных. Если вы будете играть сверху, человек почувствует, что вы доминируете над ним. Д…
❤64🔥24💯10🙏4🤝3✍2
Тебе очень нравится себя жалеть. Я понимаю. Но, как бы тебя это ни тешило, от этой привычки придется избавиться. В жизни воина нет места для жалости к себе. Бесполезно пребывать в печали и ныть, чувствуя себя вправе этим заниматься, и верить, что кто-то другой что-то делает с нами. Никто ничего не делает ни с кем. Тебе пора было бы уже принять на себя всю полноту ответственности за свои действия. © «Путешествие в Ик…
❤96💯40🔥28❤🔥7🤝2
Индульгирование, или игра в собственную значимость. Ниже статья об этом, немного отредактированная перед публикацией (автор статьи неизвестен): Индульгирование – ещё один термин, который подарил широкой общественности Карлос Кастанеда. Это термин от Дона Хуана и происходит он от слова «индульгенция» – освобождение от кары за грехи, если человек уже покаялся (применялось в католической церкви). Индульгирование можно …
❤54🔥28🤝7❤🔥3
На кадрах настоящая мистика 🌿 🌿 🌿 🌿 🍄🟫 Говорят мне нужно продавать такие фото 😆😁 Кто готов купить?
❤83🔥39💯15
Забавная ситуация) Ранее я обращался к вам за поддержкой. Это был непростой шаг на самом деле. Мол, как это так: автор видео переводит и создаёт книги, у него большая аудитория, а он просит помощи у подписчиков? Порой за внешней красивой картинкой всё не так ванильно и радужно 🥲 И да, это моментально бьёт по образу, некого серьезного автора 😆 В итоге отклик был скромным, как и моё обращение))) И сейчас понимаю, чт…
❤118💯41🔥24🤝12❤🔥4🙏4
“But if I'm not the same, the next question is, Who in the world am I? Ah, that's the great puzzle!” «Но если я уже не та, то следующий вопрос: кто же я тогда? Ах, вот это уже великая загадка!» © Льюис Кэрролл, «Алиса в Стране чудес» 🌟🌟🌟 Купил такое интересное издание этой философской книги)) Что интересно, в русском переводе, который у меня в книге, эта же мысль звучит по другому: «...кто же я в таком случае? Это…
❤59💯26❤🔥14🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @notes_spirit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мысли Души 🧠” (@notes_spirit), 17,234 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/notes_spirit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.