Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Роман Иноземцев

@auslanderthoughts

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

516subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001273800261
TypeChannel
Username@auslanderthoughts
DescriptionКрепка мышца Твоя, сильна рука Твоя, высока десница Твоя! По вопросам фин.анализа и управленческого учета писать сюда @afinance89
Created25 December 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/auslanderthoughts

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Мысли Иноземцев — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

5166 Aug 2026, 05:11 — 516 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 18:33 — 516 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 05:116 Aug 2026, 18:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 515–517 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 18:33516no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:11516first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.1%
avg views ÷ 516 subscribers
Avg views / post
166
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (22 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total2,980
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,810
Videos
436
Links
5,380

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1130.6%
🔥719.4%
🤩616.7%
513.9%
🤔38.33%
🥰25.56%
💯12.78%
😱12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC93 viewsread 6 August 2026

Очередное доказательство того, что для подъема рождаемости надо мотивировать не женщину, а мужчину.

2 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC113 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Тут самое главное тему не политизировать, а то мы и так последствия реваншизма не можем разгрести. И что самое мерзкое, в реваншизм есть огромное изкушение провалиться на фоне трудностей и неудач, списывая все на козни внешних сил. Эта ситуация опасна тем, что неудачи - это признак слабости, неудачи толкают в реваншизм, а реваншизм толкает на агрессию. Агрессия слабого заканчивается поражением и унижением, которые л

🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC141 viewsread 6 August 2026

На всякий случай напомню, что ЭФКО - это очень крупная российская компания из Белгородчины, которая, тем не менее, не принадлежит никакому олигарху*. Поэтому ситуация не так однозначна, как может показаться, ведь описанная схема характерна для 100% российских производителей дронов. Думаю, и наценка у ЭФКО была не рекордной. Вообще, настоятельно рекомендую ознакомиться с историей фирмы. Она вызывает прям уважение, на

31 Jul 2026, 07:26 UTC116 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ordinaryczarizmPhoto

Основателя «Телеграма» Павла Дурова официально внесли в список террористов и экстремистов Росфинмониторинга. Такие теперь у нас террористы. Наиболее яростный комментарий по этому поводу дал депутат Алексей Чепа. По словам депутата, если «Дуров не хочет вести переговоры с Россией, а предпочитает поддерживать Украину, то он становится не просто предпринимателем, а пособником украинского режима под покровительством зап

🤩2😱1

30 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC213 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Зрада пробралась в магазины Москвы.

🤩41

29 Jul 2026, 07:18 UTC161 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вчера начал смотреть Одиссею. Больше часа не осилил, т.к. тягамотина даже несмотря на перекусы Полифема и приветствие от лестигонов. Каст на роль Елены Троянской одобряю. Во-первых, потому что это исторично и ровно так она и выглядела потому, что она создала хайп вокруг откровенно скучного фильма. Если бы не полыхание жоп из-за Елены Троянской, то я так и не сел бы эту скукотищу смотреть. Тем более, что в фильме не

1

28 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC178 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Формально американцы вышли из капитала Озона в 2024 году аж. Видимо, искали конфидентов 2 года. И хоть формально они не владеют Озоном, на самом деле там все точно так же, как и во многих фирмах, где владельцы сменились поле февраля 22 года. Поэтому ВСУ и не сильно жалуют Озон. Хотя, рано или поздно что-нибудь для приличия могут и спалить. Эта картина наглядно показывает иерархию и какое в ней место занимают ребята

🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC192 viewsread 6 August 2026

Всякое дурачье, не поступившее в Институт, при первой удобной возможности любит в него кинуть камень, как только МИД РФ делает то, что ему не нравится. Мол, МГИМО ерунда, дураков готовит. Если МГИМО ерунда, то почему главы государств, которые являются выпускниками Института, ведут себя, как красавчики и имея откровенно слабые карты на руках, выигрывают одну раздачу за другой?

26 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC188 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На днях открыл для себя ролики отца Кирилла (Иванова) на тему критики эволюции. Узнал для себя много нового. Ролик про динозавров прям впечатлил. Всем советую. Но заход в тему лучше всего начинать с ролика, изобличающего мракобесие атеистов. Это прям платина, где коротко и понятно показано, как атеисты портят науку. Причем, портят осознанно, т.к. приходят в нее для того, чтобы закрыть свои гештальты и нацчная истина

👍3

24 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC179 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Банк России все же снизил ставку. Пусть на 0,25 пп, но снизил. Учитывая проблемы в бюджетной сфере, есть основания полагать, что между банкротствами и инфляцией выбрали инфляцию. Поэтому после выборов я бы ожидал начало массовой эмиссии для затыкания дыр в бюджете и рост цен.

🥰2

24 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC193 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Экономист Роман Иноземцев, комментируя ситуацию «Краснодарским известям», подчеркнул, что у Центробанка сейчас нет пространства для маневра в сторону смягчения. «Никаких оснований для дальнейшего снижения ставки я не вижу. Снижение ставки обернется стремительным ростом цен, который тоже понравится не каждому», — заявил эксперт. По его словам, любое послабление в ДКП приведет к немедленному обвальному росту цен, осо

👍2

24 Jul 2026, 07:07 UTC161 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Мне задали уместный вопрос, как же получается что дамочка с состоянием много миллиардов рублей по уши в долгах и убытках? Как так? Все сложно. Во-первых, все разговоры про богатство - это разговоры про оценку активов. Причем, эту оценку дают не специально нанятые консультанты, которые месяцами оценивают бизнес и на основании цифр и своей методики высчитывают его стоимость. Нет, это делают журналисты. В западных СМИ

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @auslanderthoughts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 376,960 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Роман Иноземцев” (@auslanderthoughts), 516 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/auslanderthoughts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.