Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Советский патриот

Channel

Советский патриот

@burckina_faso

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,403subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001170956321
TypeChannel
Username@burckina_faso
DescriptionЭто блог объективной информации о нашем прошлом и настоящем с целью повлиять на будущее. Для желающих подписаться на Бусти: https://boosty.to/burckina_new Почта для связи: [email protected]
Created30 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/burckina_faso

Growth

11,40311,44011,421.56 August 2026 — 11,440 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,435 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,433 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,426 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,424 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,421 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,415 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,413 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,408 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,403 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 11 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,397–11,446 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:3711,403-5
16 Aug 2026, 02:3411,408-5
14 Aug 2026, 09:5811,413-2
13 Aug 2026, 01:5511,415-6
11 Aug 2026, 23:5211,421-3
9 Aug 2026, 18:2211,424-2
8 Aug 2026, 16:1911,426-7
7 Aug 2026, 14:4411,433-2
6 Aug 2026, 14:0511,435-5
6 Aug 2026, 02:5011,440first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 11,403 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,690
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held60 (30 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total101,629
Reactions total5,729
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,930
Videos
45
Links
6,130

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

5,240 reactions across 55 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,06258.4%
🤬4658.87%
😁4228.05%
🔥2504.77%
💯2434.64%
🤡1552.96%
🤔1462.79%
👏1442.75%
😢1011.93%
671.28%
💊240.458%
🤯230.439%
🤣210.401%
🤝190.363%
❤‍🔥130.248%
😱130.248%
🥰130.248%
👎110.21%
🥱110.21%
🙈70.134%
13 further kinds300.573%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,729reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC789 views45 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Искусственный интеллект против слов Путина о социальной инфраструктуре Владивостока Владимир Владимирович, будучи во Владивостоке 3 сентября 2021 года, заявил следующее: Поскольку в статье подвергаются сомнению слова Нашего всего, что по нынешним временам опасно, то доступ к содержанию статьи только по преимум-подписке на Дзен или на Бусти.

👍33🔥7🕊4🥱1

17 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC889 views64 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Сравнение США и Австрии можно применить к сравнению СССР и РФ, когда от капитализма выиграли только верхние 10-15%, а все остальные проиграли.

👍47💯13🔥4

17 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC826 views67 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @sterngangPhoto

Американская модель против австрийской: бедные проигрывают, богатые — выигрывают США в среднем более состоятельная экономика даже на фоне большинства развитых стран, но это преимущество распределено крайне неравномерно. В 2022 году подушевой ВВП по ППС составлял около $78 тыс. в США и $72.1 тыс. в Австрии. Разрыв — всего 8%, однако на противоположных концах доходной шкалы картина различается гораздо сильнее. В нижн

💯53🔥7🤔61

17 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC935 views73 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Завершающая часть расследования дела о фальшивой колбасе О том, что сейчас колбаса совсем не та, какая была в СССР ясно многим на бытовом уровне: не тот вкус, не тот запах, не то качество и т.д. Но одно дело -- понимание на интуитивном уровне и совсем другое... Дочитать полностью можно на Дзен. Доступ к статье открытый благодаря тем немногим, кто помогает автору донатами или подпиской на Бусти.

👍66💯6🤡1

16 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈1,120 views105 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Forwarded from @politeconomicsPhoto

А пока люди будут работать круглые сутки, роботы будут ходить по кафе и магазинам, путешествовать; иными словами, потреблять все то, что производят люди. Капитализм сам себя не воспроизведет.

👏68😁24🥰6👍4🦄3

16 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC≈1,540 views188 reactionsread 17 August 2026

«Яблоко» потребовало снять с выборов все парламентские партии В партии заявили, что нашли у всех парламентских партий следы иностранного финансирования на сумму около ₽1 млрд. Теперь «Яблоко» требует применить к ним ту же логику, по которой Верховный суд ранее снял партию с выборов в Госдуму. Требуют они. А не они ли требовали от Ельцина расстрелять Верховный совет в 1993 году? Вот теперь кушайте, не обляпайтесь,

👍136😁25💯20👎3🔥21❤‍🔥1

16 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,330 views95 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Пропаганда со времен Перестройки буквально обрушила на имя Сталина поток самых ужасных обвинений, называя его палачом, тираном и т.д. Но допустимо ли его так называть с учетом фактов? Большая просьба не забывать переходить по ссылке на Дзен, если Вам, конечно, интересны факты и Вы хотите поддержать автора хотя-бы лайками. Доступ к статье открытый благодаря тем немногим, кто помогает автору донатами или подпиской на

👍86❤‍🔥52🔥1😴1

16 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈1,290 views27 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Огромное спасибо одному подписчику за помощь!!! 🤝🤝 https://yoomoney.ru/to/410011016797572

🤝17👍7🔥2🎃1

16 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC≈1,370 views97 reactionsread 17 August 2026

В чём россияне выиграли, а в чём проиграли после развала СССР? Продолжу любимое занятие антисоветчиков, сравнивающих покупательную способность нынешних зарплат относительно советских на примере какого-нибудь удобного для них продукта или товара. Например... Дочитать полностью можно на Дзен. Доступ к статье открытый благодаря тем немногим, кто помогает автору донатами или подпиской на Бусти. ———————————- Показов на

👍91❤‍🔥4🔥1🥱1

15 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC≈1,440 views87 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Стоит ли Путину бояться искусственного интеллекта? Владимир Владимирович на неделе беседовал с одним айтишником и заявил, что он ничего не боится, включая искусственный интеллект. Запомним этот момент. Дочитать полностью можно на Дзен. Доступ к статье открытый благодаря тем немногим, кто помогает автору донатами или подпиской на Бусти.

👍69🤡15🔥2❤‍🔥1

15 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC≈1,480 views92 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Что общего между Татьяной Голиковой и Винни-Пухом? Слушая вице-премьера Татьяну Голикову о непростой демографической ситуации в России, мне вспомнилось оправдание Винни-Пуха о... Дочитать полностью можно на Дзен. Доступ к статье открытый благодаря тем немногим, кто помогает автору донатами или подпиской на Бусти.

👍67🔥11🤡8💯31🥱1😁1

14 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,460 views139 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Толкователь продолжает толкать антисоветскую дичь: В отличие от СССР, мы наконец-то сейчас накормили страну – это вообще-то хороший, положительный пример, как всё же можно вылезти из исторической колеи, от вечного недоедания (а то и голода) в стране. Почему в отличие от СССР? Неужели трудно заглянуть на Росстат и увидеть, что самый низкий уровень потребления был конце 90-х? И что уровня потребления 1990 года Россия

👍124💯10🔥41

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @burckina_faso. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 526,321 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Советский патриот” (@burckina_faso), 11,403 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/burckina_faso.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.