4 дня за 20 секунд.
🔥119❤29👍15

Channel
@pantus_live
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23,173subscribers
-147 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001544344626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pantus_live |
| Description | ⚙️ Профайлер 🧠 Клинический психолог 📠 Полиграфолог 🛒 Спикер / тренер / лекции в вашем городе 📺 1 TV "На самом деле". РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67cfd71ad1fa733f934d6a15 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pantus_live |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 23,173 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 23,183 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 23,184 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 23,186 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 23,193 | -16 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 23,209 | -19 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 23,228 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 23,240 | -12 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 23,252 | -12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 23,264 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 23,269 | -17 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:39 | 23,286 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 23,299 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 23,306 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 23,314 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 23,320 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 23,320 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (26 May 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 59,820 |
| Reactions total | 3,747 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,635 reactions across 28 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,517 | 53.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1,749 | 26.4% | |
| 👍 | 530 | 7.99% | |
| 👏 | 237 | 3.57% | |
| 💯 | 232 | 3.50% | |
| 🥰 | 142 | 2.14% | |
| 😱 | 59 | 0.889% | |
| 🤷♀ | 35 | 0.528% | |
| 🤗 | 31 | 0.467% | |
| 🙏 | 24 | 0.362% | |
| 🤝 | 16 | 0.241% | |
| 💘 | 11 | 0.166% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 0.136% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 0.121% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 0.106% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 0.106% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 0.106% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 0.09% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.045% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.03% | |
| 2 further kinds | 3 | 0.045% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,635reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pantus_live. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
4 дня за 20 секунд.
🔥119❤29👍15
Posted without readable text
❤100🔥33👏15👍2
Начало серии постов о пешем походе #ДорогадоЛавры С начала года меня буквально начал преследовать Путь Сантьяго (паломнический путь из Португалии в Испанию): ролики в соцсетях с залитыми солнцем тропами, от которых внутри что-то щемит, рассказы про ракушки на рюкзаках, братство идущих этим путём и про то, как после 260 км человек возвращается совсем другим - и я каждый раз ловила себя на мысли: "А что, если и я так …
❤85👍20🔥15👏5💯3❤🔥2🙏2
Мы дошли!!! Сегодня в 17:00 прибыли в Лавру. Итого 156 км, 4 дня в пути. Непередаваемые впечатления и ощущения! Завтра начну рассказывать, этот путь стоит того!!!
❤123🔥62👍26🕊2
Сегодня был жаркий денёк, во всех смыслах:))) Остановились на ночёвку на 87 км #дорогавЛавру, осталось около 35 км. Завтра дойдём до финиша! За спиной 116 км пешком, в пути 3 дня. Ноги, на удивление, живы:) Много интересных мыслей в процессе этого похода, наснимала много красоты, но монтировать и писать не хватает ни времени, ни зарплаты батареи. Дойду и все напишу и смонтирую.
🔥106❤30👍16🙏3
Сегодня день прошел так. Интересный опыт, обязательно поделюсь, но не сегодня. И не завтра. Нужно сначала дойти. Еще пару дней. #дорогавЛавру 120 км, осталось 69, хотя прошли всего 76,5 за 2 дня.
🔥85👏26❤23👀6🥰2
Сегодня как-то так, надеюсь, выживу и на днях расскажу 🤣🤣🤣🤣 #дорогавЛавру, 130 км пешком.
🔥96😱45❤29👍12🏆7
Video message, posted without a caption
❤139🔥30⚡8🥰3❤🔥1
Пока писала третью мысль, за ней цепочкой пришла четвертая…. Ничего не могу с собой поделать. Учитывая, застой в постах, я решила не ограничивать себя, когда мысли приходят и писать, даже при отсутствии реакций, хотя, не скрою, очень мне нравится, когда вы включаетесь и комментируете, если Вам отзывается текст. Почему мы тащим всё на себе? Или история про «незаменимость». Знаете, я часто ловлю себя на мысли: пока я…
🔥135❤89👍38💯19🥰8👏6🙏5
Завершаю триаду посетивших меня мыслей. Про выбор «хочу» вместо «надо». Раньше я жила по принципу «надо». Надо встать, надо работать, надо ответить всем, надо успеть, надо быть удобной, надо не подвести, надо оправдать ожидания. И это «надо» тянуло за собой бесконечный список, который никогда не заканчивался. Но если честно, самое главное «надо» звучало иначе: надо быть хорошей. Чтобы меня не ругали. Чтобы меня л…
❤171🔥37👏33💯20👍5❤🔥2
Ищу смелого кандидата из Москвы! 🕵️♂️ Друзья, мне нужен «подопытный» для практического занятия на моем курсе «Поведенческий аналитик». Будем разбирать тему: HR-профайлинг и эффективное кадровое интервью. Что вас ждет? Живое участие в практической лекции. Проведём структурированное кадровое интервью, составим характерологический профиль и разберём ваше резюме в группе студентов. Это уникальная возможность взглянут…
❤49🔥24👏11
Продолжаю делиться своей серией размышлений. Мысль вторая. Про сравнение себя с другими. Я поймала себя на странном ощущении: я перестала сравнивать себя с другими. Раньше это было автоматически. Даже не осознанно - просто привычка, встроенная в ежедневный фон. У кого-то ярче жизнь, у кого-то быстрее карьера, у кого-то успешнее проекты, у кого-то с дисциплиной намного лучше. Я оглядывалась на чужие достижения и ч…
❤153💯40🔥30👏12👍4👌2
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @pantus_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PANTUS | Сабина Пантус” (@pantus_live), 23,173 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pantus_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.