Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for علم اصول ( تحقیقی، کاربردی و روان )

Channel

علم اصول ( تحقیقی، کاربردی و روان )

@osooleravan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

62subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001385491076
TypeChannel
Username@osooleravan
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 5 January 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/osooleravan

Growth

6211 Aug 2026, 02:47 — 62 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 17:47 — 62 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 02:4711 Aug 2026, 17:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61–63 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 17:4762no change
11 Aug 2026, 02:4762first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 January 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

28 Oct 2021, 16:44 UTC452 viewsread 11 August 2026

باسمه تعالی کانالهای تلگرامی اینجانب سید جعفر موسوی اصفهانی به لطف الهی : ۱_ @oloomedini معارف اسلامی ۲_ @rahkojast نکته های خواندنی ۳_ @feghheravan خارج فقه ۴_ @osooleravan خارج اصول ۵_ @taammolidarvahy تفسیر قران ۶_ @asharedelpazir اشعار دل نشین ۷_ @rejalejadid علم رجال ۸_ @Naghdefalsafe نقد فلسفه و عرفان ۹_ @soal_javab110 پرسش و پاسخ

4 Jul 2021, 11:07 UTC504 viewsread 11 August 2026

نکته مهم برای استنباط احکام و معارف دین قران و روایات به عرف عقلاء القاء شده و فهم همانها هم حجت هست و از تعمق ( فرو رفتن و دقتهای زیادی و خارج متعارف ) در روایات متعدد نهی شده : مثلا در کافی ج۲ص۳۹۲در حدیث دعائم کفر از امیرالمؤمنین ع امده: ...فمن تعمق لم ینب الی الحق و لم یزدد الا غرقا فی الغمرات و لم تنحسر عنه فتنة الا غشیته اخری وانخرق دینه فهو یهوی فی امر مریج . ودر ج۱کافی ص۹۱: سئل علی بن الحسین ع عن التوحی

29 Jun 2021, 22:17 UTC385 viewsread 11 August 2026

امیدوارم موفق شوم اخرین دوره صوتی را ( که تا برائت جلسه ۲۶ بیان شده) تکمیل نمایم ان شاءالله

29 Jun 2021, 22:13 UTC379 viewsread 11 August 2026

البته بصورت مختصر ، ساده ، مفید باحذف زوائد و مباحث پیچیده ایکه غالبا کاربردی و مفید نیست

29 Jun 2021, 22:10 UTC373 viewsread 11 August 2026

تذکر : مخاطبین محترم مستحضر باشند در همین کانال ( به لطف الهی ) عمده مباحث علم اصول ( صوتی و مکتوب) کاملا بیان گردیده و در موارد متعدد ، مکرر ذکر شده است .

1 Apr 2021, 03:38 UTC460 viewsread 11 August 2026

تذکر : اینکه گفتیم مراجعه به کلمات دیگران انسان را اگاه تر میکند ٬ کلیت ندارد ، موارد فراوانی یافت میشود که مطلب بر عکس است هر چند گوینده از معاریف باشد و این امر برای خود این حقیر بارها اتفاق افتاده که : اگر انسان مستقیما و بدون سابقه ذهنی به ایه و روایتی رجوع میکند ، به صورت درست و صحیح میفهمد ولی وقتی با توضیحات و مقدماتی که شخص دیگر سراغ ایه و روایت میرود ، مطلب را به گونه دیگری ( بواسطه برداشت اشتباه گوینده به

1 Apr 2021, 01:58 UTC421 viewsread 11 August 2026

نکته بسیار مهم در روش فهم معارف دین گر چه ما بارها در مباحث مختلف با صراحت و کنایه این مطلب بسیار مهم برای روش تحقیق در معارف مختلف اسلامی برای اهل نظر ( با کمال تواضع و احترام ) را ذکر کردیم اما ، بخاطر اهمیت فراوان ان و توضیح مراد از این روش مناسب است سخنی عرض شود : حدیث شریف ثقلین که شکی در اعتبار ان نیست از قول رسول الله ص میفرماید : انی تارک فیکم الثقلین کتاب الله و عترتی اهل بیتی ما ان تمسکتم بهما لن تضلوا (

24 Mar 2021, 16:37 UTC185 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @linkdoni_hozaviPhoto

🔹یک کانال برای همه چیز ♦️بجای چندین کانال فقط یک لینکدونی داشته باشید 🔸بهترین کانال های حوزوی را در اینجا بیابید (در حال عضو گیری) ♦️ثبت کانال های حوزوی و مذهبی: @bosjin 🔽 @linkdoni_hozavi

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @osooleravan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 722,925 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“علم اصول ( تحقیقی، کاربردی و روان )” (@osooleravan), 62 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osooleravan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.