Channel
@niemeyeroffiziell
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,863subscribers
-54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001630870277 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @niemeyeroffiziell |
| Created | 28 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/niemeyeroffiziell |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 6,863 | -11 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 6,874 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 6,880 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 6,882 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 6,886 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 6,889 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 6,891 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 6,894 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 6,900 | -8 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:12 | 6,908 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 6,912 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:20 | 6,917 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 6,917 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 41 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
592 reactions across 38 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 488 | 82.4% | |
| 👎 | 104 | 17.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 592 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Einheitsgewerkschaften & BSW Die Ausladung von BSW -Vertretern durch Verdi ist extrem kleingeistig und politisch falsch, auch wenn klar ist, dass die AfD erklärter Feind der Gewerkschaften ist und dass "Freunde" von Feinden selten als eigene Freunde infrage kommen. Allerdings...wie wollen die Gewerkschaften ohne Dialog, Aufklärung und auch knallhartem Disput jemals wieder mit jenen reden, sie wieder gewinnen, deren …
Sarah Bosetti bezeichnet Teile der Gesellschaft als Blinddarm, den man nicht braucht. Herbert Grönemeyer ruft immer wieder auf, keinen Millimeter nach rechts abzuweichen, will "diktieren, wie ne Gesellschaft auszusehen hat" und diffamiert Menschen als "rechte Ratten". Jan Böhmermann sagte, man solle vielleicht an paar "Nazis" keulen. Pianist Igor Levit sprach AfD-Mitgliedern das Menschsein ab, Hape Kerkeling diffamie…
👍20👎1
https://iz.ru/2149938/2026-08-16/nemetckii-politik-zaiavil-o-prave-rossii-na-zashchitu-svoikh-sudov-ot-provokatcii-nato
👎1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍6👎2
Photo, posted without a caption
So ist es: das BSW ist ohne Fundament und eine rein auf Parlamentarismus ausgerichtete Partei. Klassenkampf geht ihr ebenso ab, wie der heutigen LINKEN. Dadurch wird man überflüssig oder Steigbügelhalter des Regimes.
👍10👎3
Das Possierliche an der Posse ist: Der Linken wurde von Wagenknecht, Dehm und Nastic, von Hunko, Mohammed-Ali, Dagdelen usw. immer vorgeworfen, aus Ohnmacht, mangelnder Selbstachtung und politischem Opportunismus nicht eigenständig gegenüber SPD und Grünen aufzutreten und sich damit zum Anhängsel der neoliberalen (Kriegs-)Parteien zu machen und entsprechend von Wechselwählern 2021 unter die 5-Prozentmarke gedrückt zu…
👍7👎5
Das ist besonders bizarr, nachdem doch das BSW einst mit dem Anspruch gestartet war, der rechtsextremen AfD die nicht-rechtsextremen, verirrten Wähler wegzunehmen (und es war damit ja sogar für eine Weile - z.B. bei der Europaparlamentswahl - nicht ganz unerfolgreich). Jetzt aber wird von BSW-Kadern und ihren prominenten, aber verhinderten Anhängern wie Dehm (oder Nastic) die AfD verharmlost, ja man fraternisiert si…
👎5
Dies gilt vor allem dann, wenn sie immer wieder die Enttäuschungen aufrufen, warum man einst mit ihnen ging, wenn sie also vor allem sich über das Anderssein zur Quellpartei (Die Linke) definieren, wenn sie bestätigen, dass der Schritt zu gehen richtig war und man selber vielleicht auch nicht prickelnd, aber der Rest vor allem verkommen ist. Zurück zum Dehm-Sharepic: Ich beobachte es heute mit Sorge, wie ernstzunehm…
👎2
Damit das gleich zu Beginn klar wird und Missverständnisse vermieden werden, auch wenn es - wer meine Arbeit kennt - eigentlich klar sein sollte: Das Sharepic drückt nicht meine Meinung aus. Ich teile es, weil sich daran etwas aufzeigen lässt: Wie das BSW (und das BSW-Umfeld) zum Durchlauferhitzer der AfD wird, obwohl es einmal das exakte Gegenteil sein wollte. Ich wollte eigentlich zum Agieren des BSW rund um die W…
Photo, posted without a caption
👍65👎3
Heinrich Heine 1856...es hat sich bis heute nichts geändert.
👍22👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @niemeyeroffiziell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“R. T. Niemeyer” (@niemeyeroffiziell), 6,863 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/niemeyeroffiziell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.