Channel
@andrea_drescher
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
713subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001234407775 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @andrea_drescher |
| Created | 16 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/andrea_drescher |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 713 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 714 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 714 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,479 |
| Reactions total | 178 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
280 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 226 | 80.7% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 7.86% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 2.50% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 2.14% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 2.14% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 1.79% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 1.79% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.07% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 280reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Systemnaher Mensch: Wenn ein bekannter Systemkritiker oder ein alternatives Medium etwas sagt oder schreibt, ist es falsch. Wenn ein Systempartei-Politiker oder ein Mainstream-Medium etwas sagt oder schreibt, ist es wahr. Systemkritischer Mensch: Wenn ein bekannter Systemkritiker oder ein alternatives Medium etwas sagt oder schreibt, ist es wahr. Wenn ein Systempartei-Politiker oder ein Mainstream-Medium etwas sagt …
👍7🔥1😁1
Mir tun die Menschen, die in Ceuta gestorben sind, unfassbar leid. Sie sind Opfer der menschenverachtenden globalistischen Politik, die da gespielt wird. Und wenn man sich Informationen von Marokkanern oder Spaniern anschaut, erkennt man die eigentlichen Hintergründe, die nichts, aber auch garnichts mit Migration oder Invasion aber auch nicht sehr viel mit Flucht zu tun haben. Es ist ein irrsinnig komplexes Thema. A…
👍10
So funktioniert Manipulation sehr erfolgreich. Fast ALLE teilen den gleichen Ausschnitt, keiner die ganze Rede "Er spricht vom heroischen Kampf der Ukrainer, der uns davor bewahren würde, dass die Front schon unmittelbar vor unserer Haustür stehen würde. Und er redet Einsätzen ohne Mandat das Wort, hält auch den Angriff auf das frühere Jugoslawien nicht für völkerrechtswidrig." Welch ein Friedensheld .... würg! ht…
🕊7👍1
Bei diesem Beitrag empfiehlt sich, ERST lesen, dann aufregen. Die Bedrohung durch Islamismus ist eindeutig. Seit Jahren sind wir durch den Terror dieser Steinzeit-Verbrecher bedroht. Ein Blick auf die Terrorangriffe seit 2001 genügt. Fast immer haben Mudschahedin, Hamas, Al-Qaida, der IS oder ISIS ihre verbrecherischen Finger im Spiel, wenn im Westen unschuldige Menschen sterben. Angefangen bei 9/11, dem Boston/Mara…
👍5
Ich hätte da mal eine Frage: Seit den Mudschahedin in Afghanistan in den 70iger Jahren über Hamas (1987), Al-Qaida (1988), den IS (2006) bis hin zur ISIS (2013) arbeitet nachweislich keine radikal-islamistische Organisation ohne Unterstützung der USA, Israels oder anderer westlicher Staaten. Ich will damit keine realen (!) Terrorangriffe, Messerstechereien oder Gang-Rapes entschuldigen, aber sollte man nicht auch …
👍20👏3
Mustererkennung: Spätestens seit 9/11 wissen wir: - Es sind (fast) immer die "bösen Islamisten", die Anschläge begehen - Pässe sind so hochwertig, dass sie Flugzeugunfälle und Einstürze von Hochhäusern überstehen. - Täter werden immer innerhalb kürzester Zeit identifiziert, weil sie unter echten Namen Autos oder Flugzeuge mieten und/oder ihre Pässe vergessen - Täter sterben direkt bei bzw. kurz nach der Tat (manch e…
👍16❤2👏1😁1
Fragen, die jeder mit 5Cent Hirnmasse, sich stellen müsste .... aber 80% der "Systemkritiker" klatschen Beifall, dass ein "gefährlicher" Islamist ausgeschaltet wurde - und fühlen sich in ihrer Islam-Hetze bestätigt. Das System dankt!
👍11👏1
Ich hätte da mal ein paar Fragen: Also das SEK erschießt CSD-Tatverdächtigen Abdul Ballout bei der Festnahme in letzter Not... Stundenlange Observation, massive Übermacht, volle Ausrüstung – und am Ende trotzdem ein toter Verdächtiger ??? Ist das der neue Status quo deutscher Spezialeinheiten? Ein Spezialeinsatzkommando observiert über Stunden eine Gartenlaube in Berlin-Spandau, plant den Zugriff, bestimmt Zeitpunk…
👍21
verarscht doch wen anderen - der attentäter wurde erschossen ... anis amri 2.0 lässt grüssen!
👍10👏4🔥2
In Anbetracht der aktuellen Lage sei daran erinnert. RIP Elias - Menschen wie Du fehlen! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnsDBJUEZ5M
👍11
Die AfD wird uns retten - Die Afd sind alles Nazis ... in diesem Spannungsfeld bewegen sich große Teile der deutschen Gesellschaft. In meinen Augen ist weder das eine noch das andere richtig. Aber kaum jemand macht sich die Arbeit und präsentiert die AfD so, wie sie wirklich ist. Hermann Ploppa hat sich die Arbeit gemacht. Sehr lohnenswert zu lesen. Für BEIDE Seiten 😊 https://www.manova.news/artikel/die-eingebettet…
👍11👏3
Verpackungsstadl: ein Anbieter, den ich Selbstversorgern in Österreich aus Überzeugung empfehlen kann. Preis-/Leistung stimmt und besonders die Service-Qualität, wenn mal was schief geht, überzeugt. Und Fehler können jedem passieren. Bei meiner letzten Lieferung gab es eine Reklamation, ich bekam zu meinen Gläsern Deckel mit der falschen Farbe. Das war nicht weiter schlimm, ich habe es halt gemeldet, weil die im Lag…
👍8👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @andrea_drescher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 339,096 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Andrea-Drescher-Texte” (@andrea_drescher), 713 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andrea_drescher.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.