Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Телега Сенеки | Евгений Цуркан

@telegaseneca

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,638subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001936217514
TypeChannel
Username@telegaseneca
Created22 July 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/telegaseneca

Growth

4,6324,6384,6356 August 2026 — 4,636 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,636 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,632 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,635 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,638 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,631–4,639 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:584,638+3
9 Aug 2026, 17:024,635+3
7 Aug 2026, 00:254,632-4
6 Aug 2026, 03:524,636no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:034,636first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.9%
avg views ÷ 4,638 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,180
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held15 (1 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total17,415
Reactions total567
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,158 reactions across 15 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
56148.4%
🔥20717.9%
👀685.87%
👻544.66%
534.58%
🤣484.15%
🦄393.37%
👾231.99%
😭231.99%
🥰231.99%
131.12%
🍓131.12%
💔100.864%
🌚90.777%
🎃40.345%
💊40.345%
🤔20.173%
💯10.086%
🗿10.086%
😱10.086%
1 further kind10.086%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,158reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC684 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

36👻9🤣6🌚3🦄2💔1

11 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC975 views103 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

55🔥2414🥰5🍓2💔1🦄1😱1

11 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC916 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Прямое включение из Белграда.

10🔥8🥰3🦄2💊1

11 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,080 views84 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Финал сезона! Мы та-а-ак устали, что решили посвятить усталости целый выпуск, а после – до конца лета заляжем на матрасы. Осенью, как бывалые рецидивисты, снова возьмёмся за старое. Иногда они возвращаются. Отчего мы устали? От работы, уведомлений, самих себя – и особенно от отдыха. Разбираемся, как тело из естественного предела наших возможностей превратилось в досадную помеху на пути к бесконечным достижениям. И

5018🔥14🦄2

28 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC≈7,440 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Вышел новый «Подкаст о философии». Гость – Иван Негреев, тема – буддизм. Дождались. В древнем буддийском тексте «Вопросы Милинды» описан спор царя Милинды с монахом Нагасеной. Царь спрашивает, кто такой Нагасена, и получает ответ: Нагасена – всего лишь имя. Отдельного и неизменного «Я» не существует. Милинду ответ, мягко говоря, не устроил. Если индивидуального «Я» нет, кто здесь крутой царь, а кто ему настроение п

48🔥34👾4🍓1🤔1🦄1

27 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC≈1,980 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В ожидании завтрашнего «Подкаста о философии» самое время оглянуться назад на выпуск с Дмитрием Бугаём. Один из лучших, правда. Рассказывая о том, каким дотошным стилистом был Платон, Бугай цитирует Цицерона: основатель Академии умер за письменным столом, продолжая править текст. История красивая, однако Геркуланумские папирусы сохранили и другую версию, согласно которой Платона погубило не ревностное служение Калли

47🔥19👀12🦄7🤣6💯1🤔1

25 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC≈1,830 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Зачитался статьёй из нового специального выпуска The Blueprint, а цитаты из старого уже на зеркалах пишут – хоть и не губной помадой, зато при менее драматичных обстоятельствах. Что происходит? А вот что: «Интерактивный арт-объект «Паноптикуму счастья» на фестивале «Архстояние». Бюро Archpoint совместно с независимым онлайн-изданием о моде, красоте и современной культуре The Blueprint переосмыслили концепцию прошлог

3616🦄84🍓3💊1

21 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC≈2,510 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

15 июля в клубе Quercus мы с режиссёром и исследователем жанра Евгением Колядинцевым провели открытый разговор «Философия ужаса». Торжественно похоронили постхоррор, elevated horror и арт-хоррор, но лишь для того, чтобы вновь эксгумировать и провести повторное вскрытие. Перемыли косточки признанным мастерам и поговорили о призрачных надеждах на будущее жанра. Среди вопросов зрителей была и классика из «Крика»: «Wha

28🥰11🔥6🦄4

15 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC≈2,460 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @theblueprintruPhoto

Настоящий вопрос о перезагрузке начинается там, где мы перестаем спрашивать «как мне восстановиться?» и спрашиваем «почему я все время вынужден восстанавливаться?» Способов перезапустить самих себя мы перепробовали уже множество, и теперь готовы подойти к главной и более сложной проблеме: как сделать так, чтобы жизнь не была марафоном от одной перезагрузки до другой? Чтобы найти ответ на этот вопрос, философу Евген

39🔥17🍓7🦄2🗿1

10 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC≈2,900 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вторая вторая встреча летнего цикла. Как возвращение вытесненного, как навязчивое повторение. Cause let's face it, baby, these days, you gotta have a sequel! В среду 15 июля в 19:00 философском клубе и кафе Quercus мы с режиссёром и исследователем жанра Евгением Колядинцевым проведём открытый разговор о философии ужаса. Поговорим о том, почему хоррор так легко скатывается в кэмп, эксплуатацию и дурной вкус, но имен

28👻6

9 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,230 views125 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @PhilosophytodayPhoto

В далекой Казании у Евгния Цуркана на жаре потекли буквы его квадрата ужаса!

63🔥27👾19🤣11💔3🦄2

7 Jul 2026, 10:09 UTC≈5,540 views114 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В новом выпуске «Подкаста о философии» поговорим о самом широкоплечем из двуногих без перьев, о философе, чья метафизическая борода не подвластна бритве Оккама, о вечно актуальном Платоне. Галопом понесёмся по самому главному и объёмному диалогу — «Государство». Возничим выступит Дмитрий Владимирович Бугай. Мы с Севой — в роли двух крылатых коней: белого и чёрного. Кто какой — решать вам.

52🔥43👀135🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @telegaseneca. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 22,924 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Телега Сенеки | Евгений Цуркан” (@telegaseneca), 4,638 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telegaseneca.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.