как хорошо, когда есть, кому дарить цветы… ехать в лифте и знать, что дверь больше никто не откроет, и ты не увидишь бабушкину улыбку — невыносимо..

Channel
farbeystefany
@farbeystefany
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,138subscribers
-558 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001737526577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @farbeystefany |
| Description | Ссылка на запись в реестре Роскомнадзора https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67b5c4c41bca1d7fe1778784 Сотрудничество : @farbeypr |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/farbeystefany |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 02:56 | 25,138 | -28 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 00:58 | 25,166 | -52 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 25,218 | -36 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 25,254 | -11 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 25,265 | +8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 25,257 | -10 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:58 | 25,267 | -24 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 25,291 | -62 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:57 | 25,353 | -45 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 25,398 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 25,393 | -30 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:05 | 25,423 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 25,441 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 25,452 | -13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 25,465 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 25,464 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 25,480 | -28 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 25,508 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 25,510 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 25,519 | first reading |
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.7%
- avg views ÷ 25,138 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,690
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (30 July 2026 – 10 October 2026) |
| Views total | 66,440 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Oct 2026, 11:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,450
- Videos
- ≈246
- Links
- ≈450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 00s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
очень тяжелая неделя для нашей семьи.. не стало моей любимой бабушки Веры сложно подобрать слова.. в душе и в мыслях нет никакого осознания. кажется, что на похоронах мы прощались с другим человеком, и я могу написать, позвонить бабушке, а она ответит. у бабушки была 4 стадия рака. мы приезжали с девочками к ней 2 недели назад, и она ещё могла сама ходить. мы все собрались на кровати и делились историями, было видн…
сегодня весь день дома, набираемся сил🫖🍂 смотрим сериал, пьем чай пересматриваю Ищейку, очень люблю атмосферу, хотя и знаю наизусть про что каждая серия 😄
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Утро выходного запечатлела в традиционном мини-влоге 💗 В нём показываю последние покупки на осень: • брюки и лонгслив как вторая кожа от бренда Sensana • розовая толстовка Kappa • и рюкзак adidas Все нашла в Спортмастере, там очень много классных брендов, и не только для спорта 🫶🏽
традиционный субботний вечер вдвоём 🫶🏽 сегодня выбрались в центр на ужин, забронировали столик в ресторанчике. оказалось невероятно атмосферное место большой выбор самой разной пиццы (в т.ч. с инжиром и лисичками) 🤤 вкусные закуски, особенно батат, и домашние лимонады локация : https://www.instagram.com/pizza22msk?stkn=MWFjaW91NzdrMXl2aw== советую 💌 *мы были в филиале на покровке
и напоминаю рецепт моей мамы, по которому шарлотка точно получится, ещё и очень вкусная лучше 3 яблока и белки взбиваем до уверенных пиков 🫶🏽
вчера каким-то образом выдался свободный вечер, решено было готовить шарлотку 🍎🍂☀️ первая за этот осенний сезон, сняла небольшое видео её приготовления и своего вечера 🫶🏽
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @farbeystefany. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@farbeystefany edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 4 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 4 October 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@poonaa_fashion_police · 50,811
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 25 August 2026
@ne_vasha_natasha_WB · 101,109
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 24 August 2026
@leontevamariya_tg · 104,877
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 23 August 2026
@olyaa_katuyshinaa · 32,800
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 4 September 2026
@poechkaaaa · 44,171
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 27 August 2026
@balyabina_sofi · 46,416
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
@missismii · 57,189
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
@nahodkiza300 · 37,526
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
@lenabalykina · 44,235
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 28 August 2026
@zhanna_dressme · 44,495
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 27 August 2026
@chikileva00 · 78,156
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 24 August 2026
@kompanenkotanya · 57,039
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 23 August 2026
@irinalesnichok · 48,300
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 25 August 2026
@kkulepetova · 39,860
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 August 2026
@stretchfitdashaa · 45,791
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“farbeystefany” (@farbeystefany), 25,138 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farbeystefany.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.