Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Психологи Козыревы. ДНК Академия бережного воспитания

Channel

Психологи Козыревы. ДНК Академия бережного воспитания

@natalkoz_fm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

69,605subscribers

-335 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001343233171
TypeChannel
Username@natalkoz_fm
DescriptionКанал психологов-практиков Дмитрия и Натальи Козыревых. Академия бережного воспитания для родителей и педагогов ДНК - победитель премии GetAward в номинации «Онлайн-школа 2023 и 2024 года». Регистрация в перечне РКН: 4338063412
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/natalkoz_fm

Growth

69,60569,94069,772.57 August 2026 — 69,940 subscribers7 August 2026 — 69,918 subscribers8 August 2026 — 69,893 subscribers9 August 2026 — 69,863 subscribers10 August 2026 — 69,842 subscribers11 August 2026 — 69,826 subscribers12 August 2026 — 69,788 subscribers14 August 2026 — 69,754 subscribers15 August 2026 — 69,709 subscribers16 August 2026 — 69,682 subscribers17 August 2026 — 69,652 subscribers18 August 2026 — 69,605 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 12 days, net -335. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69,555–69,990 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 21:5869,605-47
17 Aug 2026, 21:1469,652-30
16 Aug 2026, 22:1869,682-27
15 Aug 2026, 13:2969,709-45
14 Aug 2026, 02:1669,754-34
12 Aug 2026, 23:1869,788-38
11 Aug 2026, 20:2569,826-16
10 Aug 2026, 17:2269,842-21
9 Aug 2026, 19:4169,863-30
8 Aug 2026, 18:2769,893-25
7 Aug 2026, 16:5169,918-22
7 Aug 2026, 07:3269,940first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.33%
avg views ÷ 69,605 subscribers
Avg views / post
924
45 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 43 of 45 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held45 (31 July 202618 August 2026)
Views total41,602
Reactions total403
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 00:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,910
Videos
689
Links
1,190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 27s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

403 reactions across 42 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20751.4%
🔥8420.8%
👍5212.9%
🥰174.22%
🎉153.72%
👏112.73%
😍40.993%
🙏40.993%
😱30.744%
🤩30.744%
😐20.496%
🤨10.248%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 403reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC308 viewsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Телефон, бардак, двойки — разбираем прямо в эфире ⚡️ Если вас раздражает телефон, пугают двойки и бесит бардак в комнате, то скорее на эфир, как раз сейчас будем разбираться с этим. ➡️ ПРИСОЕДИНИТЬСЯ

18 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC354 views2 reactionsread 19 August 2026

⚡️ Через 30 минут повтор первого дня Премьеры! Ровно в 19:00 по мск начнётся повтор 1-го дня ЗАКРЫТОЙ ПРЕМЬЕРЫ «Ребёнок: новый уровень отношений». Включайтесь, чтобы разобраться: 🔺почему на любое ваше слово вы получаете ледяное «отстань» 🔺что на самом деле скрывается за его «ленью» и зависанием в телефоне 🔺какие 7 родительских реакций заставляют детей закрываться от нас Чат дневного эфира разрывался от инсайтов р

2

18 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC412 views1 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня в 13:00 мск состоялся первый день нашей ЗАКРЫТОЙ ПРЕМЬЕРЫ «Ребёнок: новый уровень отношений» Все в восторге, чат буквально разрывался от историй родителей. Мы знаем, что в середине дня не все смогли отложить дела, работу или заботу о семье. Если вы пропустили этот важный эфир, то специально для вас сегодня в 19:00 по мск мы запланировали повтор первого дня. Вот что вы пропустили на дневном эфире, но увидит

1

18 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC465 views2 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

2

18 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC571 views4 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

А что, если он так и не возьмется за голову? 🤔 Учёба поехала в тартарары, а ему как будто всё равно. Он ничего не хочет, ни к чему не стремится, а любая ваша попытка поговорить разбивается о ледяное «отстань». И самое страшное здесь даже не текущие двойки, а то, что будет дальше. Внутри всё сжимается, а что если, он так и не возьмется за голову? Скатится, не поступит, свяжется с сомнительной компанией и окончательн

👏4

17 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC717 views11 reactionsread 19 August 2026

Представьте, вы готовите ему любимый ужин, заглядываете в комнату и мягко спрашиваете: «Ну как ты, как день прошёл?». Вы искренне хотите обнять его, побыть рядом, а в ответ прилетает ледяное, сквозь зубы: «Нормально. Закрой дверь». И вы стоите в коридоре с этой тарелкой, глотая обиду, и понимаете, что вас просто выставили из жизни собственного ребёнка. Сколько ещё вечеров вы готовы терпеть эту глухую стену на своей

11

17 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC743 views11 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

«Лучше бы ты вообще не была моей мамой»🥲 Сколько раз вы глотали это вместе с комом в горле? Сколько вечеров провели, глядя в стену на кухне и пытаясь унять дрожь в пальцах? В вашем собственном доме об вас вытирают ноги. И самое паршивое, что вы это позволяете, потому что не знаете, как выключить этот ад. ⚡️ Поймите одну вещь, что подросток хамит потому что его сжигает внутренний пожар, а грубость — это корявая п

👍63👏1🔥1

16 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC783 views23 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

А как проходят ваши выходные? 😉

11👍8🔥2😱2

16 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC864 views1 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

🙈 «Я больше не могу орать…» Вы ведь обещали себе сегодня утром, что этот день пройдёт спокойно? Без криков, нервов и этого звенящего ультразвука на всю квартиру. Но наступает вечер. Вы просите выключить компьютер, но ноль реакции. Просите второй раз, ребёнок даже голову не поворачивает. На десятый внутри взрывается атомная бомба. Вы срываетесь на дикий ор, угрожаете забрать телефон, а в ответ хлопок двери, из-за ко

🤨1

15 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC892 views7 reactionsread 19 August 2026

«Вставай, поешь, убери»: почему ваш ребёнок перестал вас слышать? 🤷🏻‍♂️ Если многие из нас понаблюдают за собой, то увидят, что общаются командами: «Вставай, поешь, убери, не забудь, сделай уроки». Постепенно эти команды занимают всё пространство дома. А затем к ним добавляются лишь претензии: «Почему опять в телефоне? Комнату убрал? Почему я должна повторять по десять раз?» В один день вы обнаруживаете, что всё о

👍61

15 Aug 2026, 05:56 UTC900 views13 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Что сказать вместо крика, когда вам врут прямо в глаза Представьте, вы случайно заглядываете в электронный дневник, а там 3 прогула и двойка за контрольную, про которую сын клялся, что написал её на четыре. Или находите в кармане куртки вейп, хотя дочь полчаса назад с честными глазами доказывала, что от неё пахнет чужими духами. В этот момент внутри всё переворачивается от обиды. Вы ловите его на мелком, глупом

9🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @natalkoz_fm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTCAnonymous Poll56 voters

В какой роли вы ловите себя чаще всего?

  1. Злой полицейский38%
  2. Аниматор34%
  3. Невидимка29%
  4. Свой вариант в комментариях9%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTCAnonymous Poll90 voters

Выбирайте тему ниже ⬇️

  1. «На все вопросы сухое «отстань», как найти те самые слова, чтобы он сам захотел поговорить со мной19%
  2. «Вечно контролирую»: как перестать стоять над душой и пинать, но чтобы правила и уроки выполнялись58%
  3. «В телефоне по 10 часов, забросил учебу и хамит», как без скандалов вернуть ему интерес к учёбе28%
  4. Что делать, чтобы ребёнок не ушёл на улицу, не начал курить вейп, и как стать для него авторитетом30%

The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,113,733 of 1,550,472entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Юлия Егорушкина о психологии
@nesovetchik · 83,083
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Шамиль Ахмадуллин | УМНОШКОЛА
@shamilahmadullin · 180,131
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Психологи Козыревы. ДНК Академия бережного воспитания” (@natalkoz_fm), 69,605 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/natalkoz_fm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.