Channel
@mr_mozart_en
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,017subscribers
-5,428 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002185428033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mr_mozart_en |
| Description | For any questions, contact: @MozartHelpBot Trading Without Borders: Mining X’s in the Crypto Market ⚠️ Not Financial Advice |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mr_mozart_en |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:09 | 31,017 | -71 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 31,088 | -62 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:21 | 31,150 | -62 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 14:57 | 31,212 | -85 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:55 | 31,297 | -59 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:01 | 31,356 | -18 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 31,374 | -32 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 31,406 | -45 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:58 | 31,451 | -66 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:19 | 31,517 | -72 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 31,589 | -88 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 08:56 | 31,677 | -78 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:27 | 31,755 | -51 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:10 | 31,806 | -67 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:39 | 31,873 | -71 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:49 | 31,944 | -69 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 32,013 | -38 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:15 | 32,051 | -140 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 32,191 | -240 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 22:39 | 32,431 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 153 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (14 April 2026 – 26 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,435 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 31 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
93 reactions across 30 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 93 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$79,500 from this post is still in play. Today saw a test tap, sellers hit the bids, but below it a liquidation cascade kicks in, down to around $76K (the bad scenario is $72K, but that's just something to keep in mind since it's less likely) Iran is trying to negotiate something, and if Trump suddenly (right before the elections, which would make sense) backs the idea of a "territorial alliance" in the East, then $…
👍3
- The market's been dead for almost a month now. Boring, uneventful, but expected. Early in any bull cycle, strong impulse moves are followed by long sideways chop and even deep pullbacks (remember 2023), and I've pointed out more than once in recent posts how much the current recovery looks like the start of the last bull run - Spot ETF inflows have flipped to outflows, but nothing critical: on average the equivale…
👍2
Bitcoin failed to hold $85,000 ⠀ The top of the chart shows the Binance spot order book heatmap for BTC/USDT: the brighter the band, the denser the limit orders sitting at that price (these are placed orders, not executed trades). Candles are 4H, and at the bottom is the order size in the "wall" itself in $M: red - sells, green - buys ⠀ Not long ago, a thick sell wall was hanging above price around 85-85.5K. In late …
👍6
⚠️ Leverage in TOP alts is starting to get overloaded ⠀ - A note on the chart: for each coin, the value of open futures contracts (open interest) is compared to its market cap. Then they look at what share of coins have this ratio in the top 10% of their own past-year values (lines smoothed over 7 days) ⠀ Right now that's almost half of the large-cap alts, and about 28% among mid caps. To be clear, this isn't the lit…
👍3
On the daily, it's worth keeping an eye on the strong div forming on BTC across all the basic indicators. BUT the chop has dragged on way too long, and at least half the time divs like this just get worked off sideways. Not a guarantee, but that's what the stats say And most importantly, BTC has flashed another, much stronger signal - but more on that tomorrow
👍1
🟢 Alts are starting to crawl out of the "median red" fairly convincingly ⠀ - Quick rundown of the chart. The blue line is the median across 500 altcoins (not to be confused with the average): what share of supply of the alts on this list (those 500 coins) is already sitting in profit (i.e. last moved at a price below the current one). The orange line is the same for BTC, and the heatmap at the bottom lays out all 500…
👍4
BTC's main support right now is in the $81-82K range Everything happening above that doesn't matter at all, just regular chop. If it drops below 81 with a confident hold, then the risk of a 77K retest appears
👍4
🟠 BTC broke out of the range. Inflows at local highs ⠀ - The chart shows the 30-day net capital change for BTC, ETH and the major stablecoins. Growth here doesn't necessarily mean new money in the system: coin purchases at higher prices are counted together with stablecoin minting net of burns (meaning liquidity can be either new or simply redistributed at higher prices). The green area shows rising inflows, red show…
👍5
🟠 45 core BTC on-chain indicators have exited bear territory ⠀ - The chart shows 45 Glassnode cycle indicators distributed across five zones - from cold to hot. The colored areas show the share of metrics in each zone (for example, if the light blue and dark blue zones combined sit above the 50 mark, it means mostly bearish signals are currently dominating the market). This diagram doesn't show the probability of a r…
👍1
Essentially, here's the most significant level on BTC's daily. The entire current range revolves around it Let's take it with some buffer - if price "gives up" the conditional $75,000, that setup could well send it back for a retest of the previously broken "two-hundred," i.e. the white 200-MA, which currently sits around the 70K mark But until that happens (a break of 75K to the downside), the relevant scenario lo…
👍3
📌 BTC is squeezed between two liquidation walls - The screenshot shows the heatmap of potential futures liquidations across all exchanges. The brighter the area, the more leveraged positions will be force-closed when price reaches that level. Shorts are at the top, longs at the bottom ⠀ 1) The August 19 pump flushed out a significant portion of shorts on the way up, but price never reached the largest liquidation cl…
👍3
🟢 Meanwhile, short-term holders have formed a new base under BTC • The CBD-STH chart shows the distribution of short-term holder coins by average entry price. The brighter the zone, the more BTC was accumulated in that price range 1) At the end of 2025, the largest cluster sat around $84-90K, but price couldn't hold it. After the breakdown, a significant portion of short-term holders ended up underwater, and BTC fa…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @mr_mozart_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 3 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoMozart's Profit Signals” (@mr_mozart_en), 31,017 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mr_mozart_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.