Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Relationship Tips

@RelationshiptipsTM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,580subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002112784088
TypeChannel
Username@RelationshiptipsTM
DescriptionUnlock the secrets to lasting love on our Channel! • Expert advice • Heartfelt insights, and • Practical tips await. Buy Ads: https://telega.io/c/RelationshiptipsTM Ads: @cobbl @bikerinho
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/RelationshiptipsTM

Growth

14,55014,58014,5657 August 2026 — 14,550 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,553 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,564 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,561 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,570 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,580 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,546–14,585 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:2414,580+10
11 Aug 2026, 11:3314,570+9
10 Aug 2026, 10:0414,561-3
9 Aug 2026, 11:0114,564+11
8 Aug 2026, 12:4714,553+3
7 Aug 2026, 18:1614,550first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.09%
avg views ÷ 14,580 subscribers
Avg views / post
888
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.527%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held46 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total40,825
Reactions total215
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
534
Videos
7
Links
392

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

215 reactions across 45 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18987.9%
❤‍🔥156.98%
👍104.65%
👏10.465%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC298 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Love feels different when you can be honest about what you feel without worrying that your emotions will push someone away. That’s what emotional safety feels like. @RelationshipTipsTM

2

12 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC349 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Some connections don’t need constant attention to remain strong. Sometimes knowing that the care is still there is enough. @RelationshipTipsTM

5

12 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC404 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

lowkey one of the sweetest things is when someone remembers something you said once and brings it up later like it actually mattered to them @RelationshipTipsTM

4

12 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC448 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The right person will make you feel wanted without making you wonder if they still want you. Their consistency will speak for itself. @RelationshipTipsTM

3

12 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC487 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Sometimes you don’t miss someone because you need them. You miss them because talking to them makes everything feel a little better. @RelationshipTipsTM

👍21

11 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC731 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

You know someone is special when you can tell them the most random things about your day and still feel like they genuinely want to hear every detail. @RelationshipTipsTM

7

11 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC799 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Some people don’t need constant reassurance because their actions already make you feel secure. That’s the kind of consistency worth holding onto. @RelationshipTipsTM

3👍1

11 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC850 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ngl it hits different when someone sends you a random message just because they wanted to talk to you @RelationshipTipsTM

3❤‍🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC857 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The right person will notice when your energy changes, even when you say “I’m fine.” They’ll care enough to ask again. @RelationshipTipsTM

3

11 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC840 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Sometimes you just need one person who makes you feel like you can finally put your guard down and breathe. @RelationshipTipsTM

5

10 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC894 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

The right person won’t just love the easy version of you. They’ll have patience for your quiet days, your overthinking, and the parts of you that take time to understand. @RelationshipTipsTM

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @RelationshiptipsTM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 387,467 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Relationship Tips” (@RelationshiptipsTM), 14,580 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RelationshiptipsTM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.