Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sky Source Ads

@sky_source

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,292subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001203028114
TypeChannel
Usernames@sky_source @source_ads
Created2 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sky_source

Growth

2,2792,2922,285.55 August 2026 — 2,279 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,279 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,283 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,282 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,283 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,286 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,286 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,292 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,277–2,294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:032,292+6
10 Aug 2026, 08:332,286no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:042,286+3
7 Aug 2026, 09:242,283+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:152,282-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:522,283+4
6 Aug 2026, 05:522,279no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:012,279first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

236 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16268.6%
👍5021.2%
🔥2410.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2025 to 5 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Apr 2026, 22:36 UTC≈6,200 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📱 We are also on WhatsApp now! ✨ Be the first one to place your ads on our channels: ⚽️ FOOTBALL 30$ Barcelona 25$ Real Madrid 20$ Arsenal 8$ Football Transfers 5$ Just Football 5$ Manchester United 🖥 EDUCATION 7$ Computer Science All channels: 75$ 93$ For more details contact: @cobbl or @otchebuch

22🔥12👍2

4 Oct 2025, 19:02 UTC≈13,900 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🟩 Welcome to Sky Source Bets! 5+ years in the making — finally launched! 🕺 No hype, no lies, and no bullshit “fixed matches” scams. We offer: ✅ Data-driven, verified tips ✅ Transparent daily results ✅ Free VIP access for the next month ✅ 24/7 honest support Join now and start betting smart, not blind. https://t.me/+iK3Iq9aBOvdkOWVk ⚠️ Responsible betting only | 18+

52👍4

17 Aug 2025, 10:04 UTC≈12,800 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇪🇸 Spanish Channels Ad Bundle 💲 Price: $128 (was $191) ⚡️ First 3 buyers today get an extra discount! Perfect for promoting during matchdays, news cycles, and fan conversations. Football + fan culture + Spanish-language content = high engagement. 📲 Tap in now — LaLiga season is live. #bundles

28

31 Jul 2025, 17:23 UTC≈160,000 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

📊 POLL TIME: What makes you click an ad on Telegram? Vote and see what others think — and maybe adjust your next ad based on it.

  1. ️The visual grabs me13%
  2. The hook line hits9%
  3. It looks exclusive / limited7%
  4. I'm already curious about the topic13%
  5. I never click ads 🤓58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍103

3 Jul 2025, 14:54 UTCviews —

Sky Source Ads pinned «✈️ Telegram channels price list: (per one post, 2 hours on top, 48 hours without deletion) 🏟 FOOTBALL CLUBS / LEAGUES / COMPETITIONS $41 @BarcelonaEN $39 @Real_Madrid $37 @Arsenal_London $35 @Manchester_City $30 @ManchesterUnited $29 Premier League $21…»

3 Jul 2025, 14:54 UTC≈9,110 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨 ATTENTION! Our catalogue has been changed, prices REDUCED significantly and NEW CHANNELS added. Be the first one to book the slot! 🤝 🗣️ Talk to us: @cobbl & @otchebuch

🔥125👍1

24 Jun 2025, 12:44 UTC≈7,820 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇬🇧 Introducing: The UK Channels Bundle Join 800,000+ viewers discovering the best in global TV. Today: UK channels — where football, news, and top British shows come together. 💲 Price: $198 (was $328) What’s inside: • Sky Sports, Sky Video, BBC Sport • Premier League coverage — matches, analysis, stories • Clubs & content you follow: @Manchester_City, @ManchesterUnited, @Arsenal_London Liverpool, Chelsea, @Newc

14

21 Jun 2025, 14:16 UTC≈4,840 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Q: “My ad got posted in a big channel, but barely anyone clicked. What went wrong?” A: Posting in a big channel doesn’t guarantee results. Here's why your ad might be flopping: ❌ Your creative blends in. If your ad looks like a regular post, people scroll right past it. Use bold design, contrast, and emotion. ❌ No clear CTA. If you don’t tell them what to do, they won’t do it. 👉 “Tap to join” > “Check it out” > “S

12👍2

20 Jun 2025, 16:23 UTC≈3,450 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sky_source_reviewsPhoto

👉 @sky_source_reviews

2

19 May 2025, 12:48 UTC≈3,380 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sky_source_reviewsPhoto

#reviews 🔈Client Feedback Just In! We always aim to deliver the best results — and we’re happy to hear that our recent campaign hit the mark! ✅ 💬 “Hi! Yes, good results, totally in line with my expectations. Since you have a good offer, I would make another ad placement…” We’re grateful for the trust and continued collaboration! 🙌 If you’re looking to promote your project with real reach — let’s talk! 💼📲

👍4

16 May 2025, 14:26 UTC≈3,120 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Let’s be real — sometimes yes, sometimes no. One good ad can bring in real followers, clicks, and customers. But one ad is like taking one step at the gym — it’s not the full workout. Here’s what matters more: • Are you targeting the right audience? • Is your ad post written to convert? • Are you consistent? If the answer is yes — then one ad can perform. But if you’re aiming to build something solid, think camp

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sky_source. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2025, 17:23 UTCAnonymous Poll8,640 voters approx.

📊 POLL TIME: What makes you click an ad on Telegram? Vote and see what others think — and maybe adjust your next ad based on it.

  1. ️The visual grabs me13%
  2. The hook line hits9%
  3. It looks exclusive / limited7%
  4. I'm already curious about the topic13%
  5. I never click ads 🤓58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2025 to 5 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 126,403 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sky Source Ads” (@sky_source), 2,292 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sky_source.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.