Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Computer Science and Programming

@computer_science_and_programming

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

140,989subscribers

-190 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001309924870
TypeChannel
Username@computer_science_and_programming
DescriptionChannel specialized for advanced topics of: * Artificial intelligence, * Machine Learning, * Deep Learning, * Computer Vision, * Data Science * Python Admin: @otchebuch Memes: @memes_programming Ads: @Source_Ads, https://telega.io/c/computer_science
Created12 April 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/computer_science_and_programming

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

140,989141,179141,0845 August 2026 — 141,179 subscribers6 August 2026 — 141,179 subscribers6 August 2026 — 141,173 subscribers7 August 2026 — 141,154 subscribers7 August 2026 — 141,129 subscribers8 August 2026 — 141,102 subscribers10 August 2026 — 141,077 subscribers11 August 2026 — 141,026 subscribers12 August 2026 — 140,989 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -190. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 140,961–141,208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:37140,989-37
11 Aug 2026, 04:55141,026-51
10 Aug 2026, 01:42141,077-25
8 Aug 2026, 23:16141,102-27
7 Aug 2026, 22:32141,129-25
7 Aug 2026, 01:17141,154-19
6 Aug 2026, 03:00141,173-6
6 Aug 2026, 01:31141,179no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:11141,179first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.07%
avg views ÷ 140,989 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,400
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held23 (28 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total170,760
Reactions total273
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
901
Videos
31
Links
1,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

442 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20446.2%
👍12027.1%
👎4510.2%
🔥337.47%
👨‍💻163.62%
🗿143.17%
😁102.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 456reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC≈2,190 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

No Index GroupBy Optimization Dolt and Doltgres were using a secondary index for GROUP BY queries even when a full table scan would be faster. By analyzing EXPLAIN output and flame graphs, the team discovered that when a filter selects more than ~50% of rows, the secondary index lookup overhead outweighs its benefits. They added heuristics to the query coster: secondary indexes are only preferred when they select few

2👍2

10 Aug 2026, 01:02 UTC≈4,890 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

DuckDuckGo "Normal F**king Sunglasses" Sold Out In Under a Week DuckDuckGo partnered with sunglasses brand Knockaround to release "Normal F**king Sunglasses" — a satirical product mocking AI-powered smart glasses. The glasses have no camera, microphone, AI, battery, or electronics of any kind. They sold out in under a week. The collaboration is a commentary on growing surveillance concerns around AI glasses, particu

10👍7🔥2😁1

6 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC≈8,090 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

What's new in PHP 8.6 PHP 8.6, scheduled for release on November 19, 2026, introduces several notable features: partial function application (PFA) for prefilling closure parameters, readonly property defaults (now allowed when implementing interfaces with property hooks), a new low-level Polling API for I/O multiplexing with epoll/WSAPoll backends, a built-in clamp() function, new isReadable/isWriteable reflection me

15👍3🔥1🗿1

5 Aug 2026, 20:14 UTC≈8,390 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Retiring the Copilot Billing Preview app GitHub has retired the Copilot Billing Preview app. Copilot spend can now be managed directly in GitHub billing settings, which offers a more complete view including user-level budgets, cost centers, and usage pool allocation. Users can view AI usage, set spending budgets, access user-level budget controls for organizations and enterprises, and pull raw usage data via usage re

5👍3😁2

1 Aug 2026, 17:21 UTC≈12,000 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Substack writers, you need a website Writers who rely on Substack as their primary digital home are making a strategic mistake. Substack and similar platforms are distribution tools, not permanent homes — when you build on someone else's platform, you're a tenant, not an owner. The POSSE model (Publish on your Own Site, Syndicate Elsewhere) offers a better approach: publish first to a domain you own and control, then

13👍9

31 Jul 2026, 18:21 UTC≈11,200 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

The Disappearing Senior: AI and Entry Level Jobs AI is eliminating entry-level developer work, but there's a less-discussed second effect: senior engineers are quietly losing their skills by only approving AI-generated output rather than doing the work themselves. The 'reasoning muscle' atrophies when judgment is never exercised. Meanwhile, no new seniors are being produced because the junior work that used to forge

👍1810

31 Jul 2026, 03:50 UTC≈10,500 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

CVE-2026-59328: Cross-Site Scripting in Eclipse Spring Boot Starter Wizard Dependency Tooltips A CVE advisory (CVE-2026-59328) has been published for a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability found in the Eclipse Spring Boot Starter Wizard's dependency tooltips. The advisory is hosted on spring.io and relates to the Eclipse IDE plugin used for Spring Boot project setup.

🔥32👍1👨‍💻1

30 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC≈10,400 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Announcing DuckDB 1.5.5 DuckDB 1.5.5 has been released as the sixth patch in the 1.5 (Variegata) line. The release includes bugfixes, performance improvements, correctness fixes, crash and internal error resolutions, and security patches. Full release notes are available on GitHub, with v2.0.0 expected in the

👍103

26 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC≈14,700 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Hello everyone some of you may not know but now we started to expand to WhatsApp and we are inviting you to join our WhatsApp channel link here 👇👇👇👇👇 WhatsApp Computer Science and Technology We welcome you all to be part of this family

👎188🔥4😁1

25 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC≈15,300 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

How I Learned to Structure React Projects Around Change, Not Folders Technical folder structures (components, hooks, services, utils) make React repos easy to browse but hard to change, because a single feature's logic is scattered across unrelated directories. The key insight is organizing code around ownership of change rather than file type. This means colocating a feature's components, state, validation, API call

🔥118👍4

24 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC≈13,200 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Locally great, globally drifting An evaluation of AI-generated frontend code in a real product reveals a recurring pattern: AI performs well in isolated, localized contexts but struggles to maintain consistency at the system level. The post argues that AI should be used as a candidate generator and validator rather than as the final decision-maker in code review.

9👍3🔥2

23 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC≈13,400 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Hello everyone some of you may not know but now we started to expand to WhatsApp and we are inviting you to join our WhatsApp channel link here 👇👇👇👇👇 WhatsApp Computer Science and Technology We welcome you all to be part of this family

👎1210👍3👨‍💻2

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @computer_science_and_programming. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 140,925 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TheSanskaarSingh
@codeslearningTG · 269,905
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Coders World
@codersworld1 · 151,242
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
Linkedin Learning
@linkedin_learning · 218,111
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
Tricky Man
@Trickyman2 · 155,348
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 August 2026
Codewithrandom
@Codewithrandom · 235,492
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
TCW - AI & Coding Resources 🚀👨‍💻
@the_coding_wizard · 182,698
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
OFLATEST - Job Updates
@oflatestblog · 149,505
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Computer Science and Programming” (@computer_science_and_programming), 140,989 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/computer_science_and_programming.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.