Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

°•ᴍᴏᴏɴ•°

@psyco_z

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

52,013subscribers

-140 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001716492620
TypeChannel
Username@psyco_z
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/psyco_z

Growth

52,01352,15352,0837 August 2026 — 52,153 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,128 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,138 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,101 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,066 subscribers12 August 2026 — 52,021 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,013 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,992–52,174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:2452,013-8
12 Aug 2026, 06:2752,021-45
11 Aug 2026, 06:3752,066-35
10 Aug 2026, 08:1352,101-37
9 Aug 2026, 06:4752,138+10
8 Aug 2026, 08:5652,128-25
7 Aug 2026, 19:1752,153first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 52,013 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,720
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held21 (8 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total40,340
Reactions total691
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,068 reactions across 21 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1,28331.5%
🤣1,01725.0%
😭64715.9%
3949.69%
💯2967.28%
🌚1212.97%
🔥521.28%
🫡451.11%
❤‍🔥220.541%
🤪200.492%
💘170.418%
🤯170.418%
💔160.393%
🤨160.393%
😢140.344%
120.295%
🤷‍♂120.295%
🤷90.221%
🥰80.197%
🕊70.172%
10 further kinds431.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,068reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 21 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @psyco_z. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC590 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Join Couple Vids💋 On Telegram !! For 👇 📌Couple pictures, video's 📌Quote's (Text's) 📌Relationship Advices Click link below to join👇

2❤‍🔥1

Signed lidu

8 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC≈3,400 views128 reactionsread 12 August 2026

if u text me "we need to talk" i'm gonna reply "yes we do" now we both stressed

😁64🤣527🔥3🤗2

Signed ᴅᴏᴋᴀ•°

5 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈4,560 views82 reactionsread 12 August 2026

this year has felt like being awake during surgery

40😭29😁7🌚4💔1😎1

Signed っ˕

26 Jul 2026, 21:17 UTC≈9,520 views106 reactionsread 12 August 2026

i hate liking people cus wyd when you not talking to me

💯63😭23🤨74💘4😁3🔥1🤣1

Signed ᴅᴏᴋᴀ•°

26 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC≈9,370 views124 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I love how my life gives me a plot twist every month

😁65😭419💔5💯3🥰1

Signed ᴅᴏᴋᴀ•°

18 Jul 2026, 05:19 UTC≈12,900 views248 reactionsread 12 August 2026

I learned a lot from my mistakes, so I decided to make more mistakes to learn more

😭106😁59🤣4929🦄4🔥1

Signed っ˕

13 Jul 2026, 16:17 UTC≈14,400 views187 reactionsread 12 August 2026

A break from someone will either make you realize how much you truly miss them or how much peace you have without them

💯11537😁16😢12🔥5🤣1🤨1

Signed っ˕

12 Jul 2026, 05:51 UTC≈14,500 views228 reactionsread 12 August 2026

They say you must fight for what is yours and then they say if it is yours then you don't have to fight for it. I'm confused, are we fighting or not?

🤣166😭1916🤯14😁6🔥2💔1🥰1

Signed ᴅᴏᴋᴀ•°

9 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC≈15,300 views132 reactionsread 12 August 2026

"ai is replacing us" i'd love to see ai get attached to a 1 week talking stage

😁84🤣1716😭11🔥4

Signed .

9 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC≈14,700 views125 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Due to financial reasons I'll be passing away

😁71😭359🤨8👍1🔥1

Signed .

29 Jun 2026, 16:21 UTC≈18,400 views212 reactionsread 12 August 2026

happily married people need to speak louder bec the internet is making marriage look like a horror story.

😁10149💯22🤣19🤪16🔥3❤‍🔥2

Signed ᴅᴏᴋᴀ•°

20 Jun 2026, 18:25 UTC≈21,200 views195 reactionsread 12 August 2026

he told me im not his girlfriend mind you this is my life i can be whatever i want

😁13322😭17💯12❤‍🔥4🫡4🥰2🔥1

Signed .

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @psyco_z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 653,915 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“°•ᴍᴏᴏɴ•°” (@psyco_z), 52,013 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psyco_z.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.