Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

أبو سفيان

@mohamedhaghbb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

761subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001161842900
TypeChannel
Username@mohamedhaghbb
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mohamedhaghbb

Growth

760761760.58 Aug 2026, 17:16 — 760 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 10:51 — 761 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 17:169 Aug 2026, 10:51
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 760–761 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 10:51761+1
8 Aug 2026, 17:16760first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 59s
Average length
1m 59s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6045.5%
3425.8%
🔥118.33%
💯107.58%
💔53.79%
🗿53.79%
😢32.27%
😱32.27%
🤯10.758%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2024 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Mar 2026, 03:36 UTC766 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

3👍3💯2

11 Aug 2025, 21:57 UTC≈1,880 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

7👍6💯1

15 Jan 2025, 21:52 UTC≈3,230 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @aqalmn3

قنوات صغيرة، كبيرة في محتواها، أحرص على متابعتها: رجل يسعى (فكرية/عقيدة) السم الترفيهي (إعلام/عقيدة) سلف غراف (إعلام/عقيدة) الانتصار لأهل الحديث (عقيدة) سويّة (تربوية/نسائية) جامع العلوم والحكم (فوائد) ما وراء الأنمي (إعلام/عقيدة) قناة عمر لقمان (نفسية/تربوية) دار نبت (تربوية) جيل الخلافة (تربوية) أبو عبدالله الرملي (أثرية) أبو سليمان التميمي (أثرية)

👍71

15 Jan 2025, 21:49 UTC≈2,650 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @aqalmn3File

#للنشر #تعميم #أرشيف #حتى_لا_ننسى إن من نكد الدنيا أن أرى نصارى الشام اليوم يتكلمون باستحقاقية مقرفة، ونبرة استعلائية لضمان حقوقهم ومساواتهم بالمسلم، بينما كانوا أعظم المناصرين لحزب البعث ونظام الأسد قبل الثورة وبعدها! هذا ملف جامع فيه خيانات النصارى للمسلمين في الشام وتحالف الكنائس مع الطاغية، موثقا بالصور والمصادر، بما لا يدع مجال للشك في أنهم ليسوا فقط شركاء في الجريمة، بل هم والقاتل سواء في الجرم. إنا لله وإنا

👍6

9 Jan 2025, 22:27 UTC≈1,930 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍4💯1

28 Dec 2024, 00:49 UTC≈1,720 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @raeq_2Photo

⬅️ فمن نحن؟ يقول الذهبي متكلما عن حديث جلوس الله سبحانه : " فإذا كان هؤلاء الأئمة: أبو إسحاق السبيعي، والثوري، والأعمش، وإسرائيل، وعبد الرحمن بن مهدي، وأبو أحمد الزبيري، ووكيع، وأحمد بن حنبل، وغيرهم ممن يطول ذكرهم وعددهم الذين هم سُرُج الهدى ومصابيح الدجى قد تلقوا هذا الحديث بالقبول وحدثوا به، ولم ينكروه، ولم يطعنوا في إسناده، فمن نحن حتى ننكره ونتحذلق عليهم؟، بل نؤمن به ونكل علمه إلى الله ". 📘 العرش للذهبي ٢/‏١٥٦.

👍42💯2

19 Dec 2024, 17:45 UTC≈1,310 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @raeq_2Voice message

من هان على الله عصاه! ومن عز عليه عصمه! اللهم ارحمنا وأعزنا واكرمنا بترك معاصيك

💔3😢3

5 Dec 2024, 12:18 UTC≈1,540 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sawia_1Video

🔖فإن أول فتنة بني إسرائيل كانت في النساء..🔖

💯42

1 Dec 2024, 20:59 UTC≈1,410 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته اللهم أصلح حال المسلمين وانصر المجاهدين في سبيلك.

👍106

8 Nov 2024, 17:45 UTC≈1,450 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

فنسيَ هؤلاء أن العدو الصفوي ومشروعه لا يقل خطورةً عن هذا المشروع الصهيوني المجرم . فانظر ما كان من بعض من لُقِّب "بالإمام والشيخ" إذ ظن المسكين ورجى الخير منهم ومن حزب اللات تحديدًا ، حتى اذا كشر الفيل المجوسي عن أنيابه وأظهر حقده على أهل السنة في سوريا أدرك هؤلاء الحمقى أن من كان يرى الناس بمرآة عقيدته هو من فاز ، وما دون ذلك هذيانٌ وحمق . حتى اذا أتت هذه الأحداث وظن الناس بالروافض خيرًا وأنهم تركوا ونبذوا "الطائ

👍5

8 Nov 2024, 17:45 UTC≈1,590 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

فلا زال هؤلاء يُربي بعضهم بعضًا على اللطميات والمظلوميات المفتعلة مغذين بذلك شرار نفوسهم وحقد قلوبهم على هذه الأمة ، مستغلين بذلك غفلتهم وجهلهم وسذاجتهم ، فمن الخذلان جهل كل هذه الحقائق التاريخية والوقائع الدامية والتغافل عن تلك العقيدة التي لم يسلم منها الله ولا رسوله ولا المؤمنون ، متناسيًا حقدهم وغِلَّهم الممنهج في دينهم والمترجم من قبل كهنتهم وولاية فقيههم . فالله الله بالمحجة البيضاء لا بغيرها ، فإنما جَمعُ ال

👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mohamedhaghbb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,209,786 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أبو سفيان” (@mohamedhaghbb), 761 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mohamedhaghbb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.